Survival from twenty adult cancers in the UK and Republic of Ireland in the late twentieth century.

Laura M Woods, Bernard Rachet, Lorraine Shack, Denise Catney, Paul M Walsh, Nicola Cooper, Ceri White, Vivian Mak, John Steward, Harry Comber, Anna Gavin, David Brewster, Mike Quinn, Michel P Coleman
{"title":"Survival from twenty adult cancers in the UK and Republic of Ireland in the late twentieth century.","authors":"Laura M Woods, Bernard Rachet, Lorraine Shack, Denise Catney, Paul M Walsh, Nicola Cooper, Ceri White, Vivian Mak, John Steward, Harry Comber, Anna Gavin, David Brewster, Mike Quinn, Michel P Coleman","doi":"10.1057/hsq.2010.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International studies have shown that cancer survival was generally low in the UK and the Republic of Ireland compared to western and northern European countries, but no systematic comparative analysis has been performed between the UK countries and the Republic of Ireland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Population-based survival for 20 adult malignancies was estimated for the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Data on adults (15-99 years) diagnosed between 1991 and 1999 in England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland (1993-99) and the Republic of Ireland (1994-99) were analysed. All cases were followed up until the end of 2001. Relative survival was estimated by sex, period of diagnosis and country, and for the nine regions of England. Predicted survival was estimated using the hybrid approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, cancer survival in UK and Republic of Ireland improved during the 1990s, but there was geographic variation in survival across the UK and Republic of Ireland. Survival was generally highest in Ireland and Northern Ireland and lowest in England and Wales. Survival tended to be higher in Scotland for cancers for which early detection methods were in place. In England, survival tended to be lower in the north and higher in the south.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The geographic variations in survival seen across the UK and Republic of Ireland are narrower than between these countries and comparable European countries. Artefact is likely to explain some, but not all of the differences across the UK and Republic of Ireland. Geographic differences in stage at diagnosis, co-morbidity and other clinical factors may also be relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":87183,"journal":{"name":"Health statistics quarterly","volume":" 46","pages":"5-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health statistics quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/hsq.2010.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: International studies have shown that cancer survival was generally low in the UK and the Republic of Ireland compared to western and northern European countries, but no systematic comparative analysis has been performed between the UK countries and the Republic of Ireland.

Methods: Population-based survival for 20 adult malignancies was estimated for the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Data on adults (15-99 years) diagnosed between 1991 and 1999 in England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland (1993-99) and the Republic of Ireland (1994-99) were analysed. All cases were followed up until the end of 2001. Relative survival was estimated by sex, period of diagnosis and country, and for the nine regions of England. Predicted survival was estimated using the hybrid approach.

Results: Overall, cancer survival in UK and Republic of Ireland improved during the 1990s, but there was geographic variation in survival across the UK and Republic of Ireland. Survival was generally highest in Ireland and Northern Ireland and lowest in England and Wales. Survival tended to be higher in Scotland for cancers for which early detection methods were in place. In England, survival tended to be lower in the north and higher in the south.

Conclusions: The geographic variations in survival seen across the UK and Republic of Ireland are narrower than between these countries and comparable European countries. Artefact is likely to explain some, but not all of the differences across the UK and Republic of Ireland. Geographic differences in stage at diagnosis, co-morbidity and other clinical factors may also be relevant.

20世纪末英国和爱尔兰共和国20例成人癌症患者的生存率。
背景:国际研究表明,与西欧和北欧国家相比,英国和爱尔兰共和国的癌症存活率普遍较低,但尚未对英国和爱尔兰共和国进行系统的比较分析。方法:估计英国和爱尔兰共和国20例成人恶性肿瘤的基于人群的生存率。研究人员分析了1991年至1999年间英格兰、苏格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰(1993-99)和爱尔兰共和国(1994-99)成年人(15-99岁)的诊断数据。所有个案均获跟进至2001年底。相对生存率是根据性别、诊断期和国家以及英格兰的九个地区来估计的。使用混合方法估计预测生存率。结果:总体而言,英国和爱尔兰共和国的癌症生存率在20世纪90年代有所改善,但英国和爱尔兰共和国的生存率存在地理差异。一般来说,爱尔兰和北爱尔兰的存活率最高,英格兰和威尔士最低。在苏格兰,早期检测方法到位的癌症存活率往往更高。在英格兰,存活率往往在北部较低而在南部较高。结论:在英国和爱尔兰共和国,生存率的地理差异比这些国家和可比的欧洲国家之间的差异要小。人工制品可能可以解释英国和爱尔兰共和国之间的一些差异,但不是所有的差异。诊断阶段的地理差异、合并症和其他临床因素也可能相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书