Novel markers, a payer's perspective: commissioning a new service.

Christopher P Price, Les Martin
{"title":"Novel markers, a payer's perspective: commissioning a new service.","authors":"Christopher P Price,&nbsp;Les Martin","doi":"10.3109/00365513.2010.493420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnostic technologies assist clinicians and care givers in making decisions about the care of individual patients. The demands for an evidence-based approach to practice, is proving to be challenging in the field of laboratory medicine as: (i) there has been little formal requirement to demonstrate evidence of effectiveness prior to the introduction of new tests, (ii) generating evidence of effectiveness of tests depends, in most cases, on complementary actions being accomplished e.g. making the correct decision on receipt of the result, and taking the right action, (iii) the principles of evidence-based laboratory medicine highlight the fact that diagnostic tests have the potential to solve a wide range of problems, in a number of clinical settings, with the potential to generate a varied range of benefits (outcomes), and (iv) outcomes invariably accrue to parts of the health economy outside of the laboratory, which can prove challenging for health service managers. Commissioning a new service involves (a) assessing the local health care needs - and the expected outcomes, (b) specifying the services required-including the resources, and transformational change required, (c) securing the services required - and the implementation strategy to be employed, and (d) monitoring against the contract issued, as well as evaluating the outcomes against the expectations. In this way the purchaser can ensure that diagnostic services are meeting clinical needs, and are being used appropriately to generate the best outcome for the patient and the exchequer, thereby meeting clinical and fiscal governance requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":76518,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum","volume":"242 ","pages":"103-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365513.2010.493420","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2010.493420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Diagnostic technologies assist clinicians and care givers in making decisions about the care of individual patients. The demands for an evidence-based approach to practice, is proving to be challenging in the field of laboratory medicine as: (i) there has been little formal requirement to demonstrate evidence of effectiveness prior to the introduction of new tests, (ii) generating evidence of effectiveness of tests depends, in most cases, on complementary actions being accomplished e.g. making the correct decision on receipt of the result, and taking the right action, (iii) the principles of evidence-based laboratory medicine highlight the fact that diagnostic tests have the potential to solve a wide range of problems, in a number of clinical settings, with the potential to generate a varied range of benefits (outcomes), and (iv) outcomes invariably accrue to parts of the health economy outside of the laboratory, which can prove challenging for health service managers. Commissioning a new service involves (a) assessing the local health care needs - and the expected outcomes, (b) specifying the services required-including the resources, and transformational change required, (c) securing the services required - and the implementation strategy to be employed, and (d) monitoring against the contract issued, as well as evaluating the outcomes against the expectations. In this way the purchaser can ensure that diagnostic services are meeting clinical needs, and are being used appropriately to generate the best outcome for the patient and the exchequer, thereby meeting clinical and fiscal governance requirements.

新颖的标记,付款人的视角:委托一项新服务。
诊断技术帮助临床医生和护理人员对个别患者的护理作出决定。对循证实践方法的需求在检验医学领域被证明是具有挑战性的,因为:(一)几乎没有正式要求在采用新的检测方法之前证明有效性证据;(二)在大多数情况下,证明检测方法有效性的证据取决于所采取的补充行动,例如在收到检测结果后作出正确的决定并采取正确的行动;(三)循证检验医学原则强调诊断检测方法具有解决广泛问题的潜力;在许多临床环境中,有可能产生各种各样的效益(结果),并且(iv)结果总是在实验室之外的卫生经济部分产生,这对卫生服务管理人员来说可能是具有挑战性的。试运行一项新服务涉及(a)评估当地的卫生保健需求——以及预期结果;(b)明确规定所需的服务——包括资源和所需的转型变革;(c)确保所需的服务——以及将采用的实施战略;(d)根据签订的合同进行监测,并根据预期评估结果。通过这种方式,购买者可以确保诊断服务满足临床需求,并被适当地使用,为患者和财政产生最佳结果,从而满足临床和财政治理要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信