Approval of novel biomarkers: FDA's perspective and major requests.

Uwe Scherf, Robert Becker, Maria Chan, Sally Hojvat
{"title":"Approval of novel biomarkers: FDA's perspective and major requests.","authors":"Uwe Scherf,&nbsp;Robert Becker,&nbsp;Maria Chan,&nbsp;Sally Hojvat","doi":"10.3109/00365513.2010.493415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>FDA has been regulating diagnostic tests (including biomarkers) since passage of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. Although always of interest as diagnostic tools, biomarkers (particularly genetic/genomic) have become of increased interest because of their potential impact on the development and personalized use of drugs. Unfortunately, there seem to be uncertainties among translational researchers as to the specific analytical and clinical measurement criteria needed for the approval of these novel biomarkers. This meeting presentation describes the current FDA perspective and major requirements and data for the validation/approval of an in vitro diagnostic device (IVD) based on a biomarker. The approval process for an IVD based on a biomarker used in the identification of a disease or condition (diagnosing, screening, monitoring) is well established, and is essentially identical to the process to generate sufficient analytical and clinical data for the approval of regular diagnostic devices. On the contrary, approvals for IVDs based on biomarker which may be designed to evaluate the efficacy or answer safety questions for new drug entities are less streamlined. The clinical studies are more complex, resulting in higher ethical standards, increased costs and requiring complex statistical evaluation. There is a small but growing literature on new models for co-development of drugs and diagnostics which will be discussed. Regulators like the FDA develop and bring a flexible regulatory toolbox to the table and are committed to assuring that scientific and regulatory thresholds are tempered to assure rapid access to new technologies while protecting public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":76518,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum","volume":"242 ","pages":"96-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365513.2010.493415","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2010.493415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

FDA has been regulating diagnostic tests (including biomarkers) since passage of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. Although always of interest as diagnostic tools, biomarkers (particularly genetic/genomic) have become of increased interest because of their potential impact on the development and personalized use of drugs. Unfortunately, there seem to be uncertainties among translational researchers as to the specific analytical and clinical measurement criteria needed for the approval of these novel biomarkers. This meeting presentation describes the current FDA perspective and major requirements and data for the validation/approval of an in vitro diagnostic device (IVD) based on a biomarker. The approval process for an IVD based on a biomarker used in the identification of a disease or condition (diagnosing, screening, monitoring) is well established, and is essentially identical to the process to generate sufficient analytical and clinical data for the approval of regular diagnostic devices. On the contrary, approvals for IVDs based on biomarker which may be designed to evaluate the efficacy or answer safety questions for new drug entities are less streamlined. The clinical studies are more complex, resulting in higher ethical standards, increased costs and requiring complex statistical evaluation. There is a small but growing literature on new models for co-development of drugs and diagnostics which will be discussed. Regulators like the FDA develop and bring a flexible regulatory toolbox to the table and are committed to assuring that scientific and regulatory thresholds are tempered to assure rapid access to new technologies while protecting public health.

新型生物标志物的批准:FDA的观点和主要要求。
自1976年医疗器械修正案通过以来,FDA一直在规范诊断测试(包括生物标志物)。生物标记物(尤其是遗传/基因组)作为诊断工具一直备受关注,但由于其对药物开发和个性化使用的潜在影响,生物标记物(尤其是遗传/基因组)也越来越受到关注。不幸的是,对于批准这些新型生物标志物所需的具体分析和临床测量标准,转化研究人员似乎存在不确定性。本次会议介绍了目前FDA对基于生物标志物的体外诊断设备(IVD)验证/批准的观点、主要要求和数据。基于用于识别疾病或病症(诊断、筛查、监测)的生物标志物的IVD的批准程序已经建立良好,并且基本上与生成用于批准常规诊断设备的充分分析和临床数据的过程相同。相反,基于生物标志物的ivd的批准可能被设计用于评估新药的疗效或回答新药实体的安全性问题。临床研究更加复杂,导致更高的道德标准,增加的成本和需要复杂的统计评估。关于联合开发药物和诊断方法的新模式的文献不多,但正在不断增加,我们将对此进行讨论。像FDA这样的监管机构开发并带来了一个灵活的监管工具箱,并致力于确保科学和监管门槛的缓和,以确保在保护公众健康的同时快速获得新技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信