Electronic medical records and communication with patients and other clinicians: are we talking less?

Ann S O'Malley, Genna R Cohen, Joy M Grossman
{"title":"Electronic medical records and communication with patients and other clinicians: are we talking less?","authors":"Ann S O'Malley,&nbsp;Genna R Cohen,&nbsp;Joy M Grossman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Commercial electronic medical records (EMRs) both help and hinder physician interpersonal communication--real-time, face-to-face or phone conversations--with patients and other clinicians, according to a new Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) study based on in-depth interviews with clinicians in 26 physician practices. EMRs assist real-time communication with patients during office visits, primarily through immediate access to patient information, allowing clinicians to talk with patients rather than search for information from paper records. For some clinicians, however, aspects of EMRs pose a distraction during visits. Moreover, some indicated that clinicians may rely on EMRs for information gathering and transfer at the expense of real-time communication with patients and other clinicians. Given time pressures already present in many physician practices, EMR and office-work flow modifications could help ensure that EMRs advance care without compromising interpersonal communication. In particular, policies promoting EMR adoption should consider incorporating communication-skills training for medical trainees and clinicians using EMRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":80012,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (Center for Studying Health System Change)","volume":" 131","pages":"1--4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue brief (Center for Studying Health System Change)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commercial electronic medical records (EMRs) both help and hinder physician interpersonal communication--real-time, face-to-face or phone conversations--with patients and other clinicians, according to a new Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) study based on in-depth interviews with clinicians in 26 physician practices. EMRs assist real-time communication with patients during office visits, primarily through immediate access to patient information, allowing clinicians to talk with patients rather than search for information from paper records. For some clinicians, however, aspects of EMRs pose a distraction during visits. Moreover, some indicated that clinicians may rely on EMRs for information gathering and transfer at the expense of real-time communication with patients and other clinicians. Given time pressures already present in many physician practices, EMR and office-work flow modifications could help ensure that EMRs advance care without compromising interpersonal communication. In particular, policies promoting EMR adoption should consider incorporating communication-skills training for medical trainees and clinicians using EMRs.

电子病历和与病人和其他临床医生的交流:我们说话少了吗?
商业电子医疗记录(emr)既有助于也阻碍了医生与患者和其他临床医生的人际沟通——实时、面对面或电话交谈——根据研究卫生系统变化中心(HSC)的一项新研究,该研究基于对26名医生实践的临床医生的深入访谈。电子病历主要通过即时访问患者信息,协助在门诊期间与患者进行实时沟通,使临床医生能够与患者交谈,而不是从纸质记录中搜索信息。然而,对于一些临床医生来说,电子病历的某些方面会在就诊期间分散注意力。此外,一些人指出,临床医生可能依赖电子病历进行信息收集和传递,而牺牲了与患者和其他临床医生的实时沟通。鉴于许多医生实践中已经存在的时间压力,电子病历和办公室工作流程的修改可以帮助确保电子病历在不影响人际沟通的情况下推进护理。特别是,促进电子病历采用的政策应考虑纳入对使用电子病历的医疗实习生和临床医生的沟通技巧培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信