The formation of cerebrospinal fluid: Nearly a hundred years of interpretations and misinterpretations

D. Orešković , M. Klarica
{"title":"The formation of cerebrospinal fluid: Nearly a hundred years of interpretations and misinterpretations","authors":"D. Orešković ,&nbsp;M. Klarica","doi":"10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The first scientific and experimental approaches to the study of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) formation began almost a hundred years ago. Despite researchers being interested for so long, some aspects of CSF formation are still insufficiently understood. Today it is generally believed that CSF formation is an active energy consuming metabolic process which occurs mainly in brain ventricles<span>, in choroid plexuses. CSF formation, together with CSF absorption and circulation, represents the so-called classic hypothesis of CSF hydrodynamics. In spite of the general acceptance of this hypothesis, there is a considerable series of experimental results that do not support the idea of the active nature of CSF formation and the idea that choroid plexuses inside the brain ventricles are the main places of formation. The main goal of this review is to summarize the present understanding of CSF formation and compare this understanding to contradictory experimental results that have been obtained so far. And finally, to try to offer a physiological explanation by which these contradictions could be avoided. We therefore analyzed the main methods that study CSF formation, which enabled such an understanding, and presented their shortcomings, which could also be a reason for the erroneous interpretation of the obtained results. A recent method of direct aqueductal determination of CSF formation is shown in more detail. On the one hand, it provides the possibility of direct insight into CSF formation, and on the other, it clearly indicates that there is no net CSF formation inside the brain ventricles. These results are contradictory to the classic hypothesis and, together with other mentioned contradictory results, strongly support a recently proposed new working hypothesis on the hydrodynamics of CSF. According to this new working hypothesis, CSF is permanently produced and absorbed in the whole CSF system as a consequence of filtration and reabsorption of water volume through the capillary walls into the surrounding brain tissue. The CSF exchange between the entire CSF system and the surrounding tissue depends on (patho)physiological conditions that predominate within those compartments.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":9291,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research Reviews","volume":"64 2","pages":"Pages 241-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.04.006","citationCount":"287","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165017310000494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 287

Abstract

The first scientific and experimental approaches to the study of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) formation began almost a hundred years ago. Despite researchers being interested for so long, some aspects of CSF formation are still insufficiently understood. Today it is generally believed that CSF formation is an active energy consuming metabolic process which occurs mainly in brain ventricles, in choroid plexuses. CSF formation, together with CSF absorption and circulation, represents the so-called classic hypothesis of CSF hydrodynamics. In spite of the general acceptance of this hypothesis, there is a considerable series of experimental results that do not support the idea of the active nature of CSF formation and the idea that choroid plexuses inside the brain ventricles are the main places of formation. The main goal of this review is to summarize the present understanding of CSF formation and compare this understanding to contradictory experimental results that have been obtained so far. And finally, to try to offer a physiological explanation by which these contradictions could be avoided. We therefore analyzed the main methods that study CSF formation, which enabled such an understanding, and presented their shortcomings, which could also be a reason for the erroneous interpretation of the obtained results. A recent method of direct aqueductal determination of CSF formation is shown in more detail. On the one hand, it provides the possibility of direct insight into CSF formation, and on the other, it clearly indicates that there is no net CSF formation inside the brain ventricles. These results are contradictory to the classic hypothesis and, together with other mentioned contradictory results, strongly support a recently proposed new working hypothesis on the hydrodynamics of CSF. According to this new working hypothesis, CSF is permanently produced and absorbed in the whole CSF system as a consequence of filtration and reabsorption of water volume through the capillary walls into the surrounding brain tissue. The CSF exchange between the entire CSF system and the surrounding tissue depends on (patho)physiological conditions that predominate within those compartments.

脑脊液的形成:近百年的解读与误读
研究脑脊液(CSF)形成的第一个科学和实验方法始于近100年前。尽管研究人员对脑脊液的形成感兴趣已久,但对脑脊液形成的某些方面仍然了解不足。目前普遍认为脑脊液的形成是一个主动的能量消耗代谢过程,主要发生在脑室、脉络膜丛。脑脊液的形成,以及脑脊液的吸收和循环,代表了所谓的脑脊液流体动力学的经典假设。尽管这一假设被普遍接受,但有相当多的一系列实验结果并不支持脑脊液形成的活动性以及脑室内脉络膜丛是主要形成部位的观点。本综述的主要目的是总结目前对脑脊液形成的理解,并将这种理解与迄今为止获得的相互矛盾的实验结果进行比较。最后,试图提供一种生理学解释,从而避免这些矛盾。因此,我们分析了研究脑脊液形成的主要方法,并提出了它们的缺点,这也可能是对所获得结果错误解释的原因。一种最近的方法直接确定脑脊液形成的导水管显示更详细。一方面,它提供了直接了解脑脊液形成的可能性,另一方面,它清楚地表明脑室内没有净脑脊液形成。这些结果与经典假设相矛盾,与其他提到的矛盾结果一起,有力地支持了最近提出的关于脑脊液流体动力学的新工作假设。根据这一新的工作假说,脑脊液在整个脑脊液系统中是永久产生和吸收的,这是通过毛细血管壁将水量过滤和重吸收到周围脑组织中的结果。整个脑脊液系统与周围组织之间的脑脊液交换取决于在这些隔室中占主导地位的(病理)生理条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Research Reviews
Brain Research Reviews 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信