The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: can low back pain patterns be predicted from the first consultation with a chiropractor? A longitudinal pilot study.

Alice Kongsted, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
{"title":"The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: can low back pain patterns be predicted from the first consultation with a chiropractor? A longitudinal pilot study.","authors":"Alice Kongsted,&nbsp;Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde","doi":"10.1186/1746-1340-18-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is widely believed that non-specific low back pain (LBP) consists of a number of subgroups which should be identified in order to improve treatment effects. In order to identify subgroups, patient characteristics that relate to different outcomes are searched for. However, LBP is often fluctuating or recurring rather than clearly limited in time. Therefore it would be relevant to consider outcome after completed treatment from a longitudinal perspective (describing \"course patterns\") instead of defining it from an arbitrarily selected end-point.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The objectives of this pilot study were to investigate the interobserver reliability of a diagnostic classification system and to evaluate whether diagnostic classes or other baseline characteristics are associated with the LBP course pattern over a period of 18 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients visiting one of 7 chiropractors because of LBP were classified according to a diagnostic classification system, which includes end-range loading, SI-joint pain provocation tests, neurological examination and tests for muscle tenderness and abnormal nerve tension. In addition, age, gender, duration of pain and presence of leg pain were registered in the patient's file. By weekly SMS-messages on their mobile phones, patients were asked how many days they had LBP the preceding week, and these answers were transformed into pain course patterns and the total number of LBP days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 110 patients were included and 76 (69%) completed follow-up. Thirty-five patients were examined by two chiropractors. The agreement regarding diagnostic classes was 83% (95% CI: 70 - 96). The diagnostic classes were associated with the pain course patterns and number of LBP days. Patients with disc pain had the highest number of LBP days and patients with muscular pain reported the fewest (35 vs. 12 days, p < 0.01). Men had better outcome than women (17 vs. 29 days, p < 0.01) and patients without leg pain tended to have fewer LBP days than those with leg pain (21 vs.31 days, p = 0.06). Duration of LBP at the first visit was not associated with outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study indicated that there is a clinically meaningful relationship between diagnostic classes and the course of LBP. This should be evaluated in more depth.</p>","PeriodicalId":87173,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","volume":"18 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-18-8","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-18-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: It is widely believed that non-specific low back pain (LBP) consists of a number of subgroups which should be identified in order to improve treatment effects. In order to identify subgroups, patient characteristics that relate to different outcomes are searched for. However, LBP is often fluctuating or recurring rather than clearly limited in time. Therefore it would be relevant to consider outcome after completed treatment from a longitudinal perspective (describing "course patterns") instead of defining it from an arbitrarily selected end-point.

Aims: The objectives of this pilot study were to investigate the interobserver reliability of a diagnostic classification system and to evaluate whether diagnostic classes or other baseline characteristics are associated with the LBP course pattern over a period of 18 weeks.

Methods: Patients visiting one of 7 chiropractors because of LBP were classified according to a diagnostic classification system, which includes end-range loading, SI-joint pain provocation tests, neurological examination and tests for muscle tenderness and abnormal nerve tension. In addition, age, gender, duration of pain and presence of leg pain were registered in the patient's file. By weekly SMS-messages on their mobile phones, patients were asked how many days they had LBP the preceding week, and these answers were transformed into pain course patterns and the total number of LBP days.

Results: A total of 110 patients were included and 76 (69%) completed follow-up. Thirty-five patients were examined by two chiropractors. The agreement regarding diagnostic classes was 83% (95% CI: 70 - 96). The diagnostic classes were associated with the pain course patterns and number of LBP days. Patients with disc pain had the highest number of LBP days and patients with muscular pain reported the fewest (35 vs. 12 days, p < 0.01). Men had better outcome than women (17 vs. 29 days, p < 0.01) and patients without leg pain tended to have fewer LBP days than those with leg pain (21 vs.31 days, p = 0.06). Duration of LBP at the first visit was not associated with outcome.

Conclusions: The study indicated that there is a clinically meaningful relationship between diagnostic classes and the course of LBP. This should be evaluated in more depth.

Abstract Image

北欧腰痛亚群项目:能否从脊椎指压治疗师的第一次咨询中预测腰痛模式?纵向试点研究。
背景:人们普遍认为,非特异性腰痛(LBP)由许多亚群组成,为了提高治疗效果,应该对这些亚群进行识别。为了确定亚组,搜索与不同结果相关的患者特征。然而,腰痛通常是波动的或反复出现的,而不是在时间上有明确的限制。因此,从纵向角度(描述“过程模式”)考虑完成治疗后的结果,而不是从任意选择的终点来定义它,将是相关的。目的:本初步研究的目的是调查诊断分类系统的观察者间可靠性,并评估诊断分类或其他基线特征是否与18周内的腰痛病程模式相关。方法:对7名脊医中1名因腰痛就诊的患者进行诊断分类,包括末端负荷、si关节疼痛激发试验、神经学检查以及肌肉压痛和异常神经张力试验。此外,年龄、性别、疼痛持续时间和腿部疼痛的存在也被记录在患者的档案中。通过每周向患者发送手机短信,研究人员询问他们在前一周有多少天腰痛,这些答案被转化为疼痛过程模式和腰痛天数。结果:共纳入110例患者,76例(69%)完成随访。两名脊医对35名患者进行了检查。诊断分类的一致性为83% (95% CI: 70 - 96)。诊断等级与疼痛过程模式和腰痛天数相关。椎间盘疼痛患者腰痛天数最多,肌肉疼痛患者最少(35天比12天,p < 0.01)。男性的预后优于女性(17天vs. 29天,p < 0.01),无腿痛患者的腰痛天数往往少于有腿痛患者(21天vs.31天,p = 0.06)。首次就诊时腰痛的持续时间与结果无关。结论:本研究提示腰痛的诊断分类与病程有临床意义。这应该进行更深入的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信