Acemetacin antinociceptive mechanism is not related to NO or K+ channel pathways.

M Gil-Flores, M I Ortiz, G Castañeda-Hernández, A E Chávez-Piña
{"title":"Acemetacin antinociceptive mechanism is not related to NO or K+ channel pathways.","authors":"M Gil-Flores,&nbsp;M I Ortiz,&nbsp;G Castañeda-Hernández,&nbsp;A E Chávez-Piña","doi":"10.1358/mf.2010.32.2.1423883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Indomethacin is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used for the treatment of acute gout and inflammation. However, its use is limited due to side effects. Acemetacin is a prodrug of indomethacin that exhibits better gastric tolerability in preclinical and clinical trials. The aim of this study was to examine if the systemic administration of acemetacin involved the sequential participation of nitric oxide (NO) or K+ channel pathways to confer its antinociceptive effect, as compared to indomethacin. The antinociceptive effect of both drugs was studied with the formalin test. Equimolar doses of acemetacin or indomethacin were administered orally. The intraplantar administration of either L-NAME, glibenclamide, apamin or charybdotoxin plus indomethacin or acemetacin was studied using the formalin test and the anti-inflammatory and antihyperalgesic effects were measured. The antinociceptive effect of acemetacin or indomethacin was not significantly different when pretreatment with L-NAME, glibenclamide, apamin or charybdotoxin was done. The antihyperalgesic and antiinflammatory effects were also similar for both indomethacin and acemetacin. Our results suggest that the antinociceptive effect of indomethacin or acemetacin is not mediated by NO or K+ channel activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18443,"journal":{"name":"Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1358/mf.2010.32.2.1423883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Indomethacin is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used for the treatment of acute gout and inflammation. However, its use is limited due to side effects. Acemetacin is a prodrug of indomethacin that exhibits better gastric tolerability in preclinical and clinical trials. The aim of this study was to examine if the systemic administration of acemetacin involved the sequential participation of nitric oxide (NO) or K+ channel pathways to confer its antinociceptive effect, as compared to indomethacin. The antinociceptive effect of both drugs was studied with the formalin test. Equimolar doses of acemetacin or indomethacin were administered orally. The intraplantar administration of either L-NAME, glibenclamide, apamin or charybdotoxin plus indomethacin or acemetacin was studied using the formalin test and the anti-inflammatory and antihyperalgesic effects were measured. The antinociceptive effect of acemetacin or indomethacin was not significantly different when pretreatment with L-NAME, glibenclamide, apamin or charybdotoxin was done. The antihyperalgesic and antiinflammatory effects were also similar for both indomethacin and acemetacin. Our results suggest that the antinociceptive effect of indomethacin or acemetacin is not mediated by NO or K+ channel activation.

阿西美辛抗感知机制与NO或K+通道途径无关。
吲哚美辛是一种非甾体抗炎药(NSAID),用于治疗急性痛风和炎症。然而,由于副作用,它的使用受到限制。阿西美辛是吲哚美辛的前药,在临床前和临床试验中表现出较好的胃耐受性。本研究的目的是研究与吲哚美辛相比,阿西美辛的全身给药是否涉及一氧化氮(NO)或K+通道的顺序参与,从而赋予其抗伤感受作用。用福尔马林试验研究了两种药物的抗伤感受作用。口服等摩尔剂量的阿西美辛或吲哚美辛。采用福尔马林试验研究L-NAME、格列本脲、阿帕胺或白藜芦醇加吲哚美辛或阿西美辛足底给药,并测定其抗炎和抗过敏作用。与L-NAME、格列苯脲、维生素a和白蜡毒素预处理相比,阿西美辛和吲哚美辛的抗伤性效果无显著性差异。吲哚美辛和阿西美辛的抗过敏和抗炎作用也相似。我们的研究结果表明,吲哚美辛或阿西美辛的抗痛觉作用不是由NO或K+通道激活介导的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信