International collaborative study to establish reference preparations to standardise haemagglutination testing for anti-A and anti-B in normal intravenous immunoglobulins by the direct method.

Q4 Medicine
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes Pub Date : 2010-04-01
S J Thorpe, B Fox, G Sharp, A B Heath, M-E Behr-Gross, E Terao, M L Virata-Theimer, M W Yu
{"title":"International collaborative study to establish reference preparations to standardise haemagglutination testing for anti-A and anti-B in normal intravenous immunoglobulins by the direct method.","authors":"S J Thorpe,&nbsp;B Fox,&nbsp;G Sharp,&nbsp;A B Heath,&nbsp;M-E Behr-Gross,&nbsp;E Terao,&nbsp;M L Virata-Theimer,&nbsp;M W Yu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A joint project (coded BSP089) was run by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) of the Council of Europe, the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) on behalf of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to evaluate, in an international collaborative study, 3 lyophilised intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) preparations for their suitability to serve as Reference Preparations to standardise and control the highly variable haemagglutination testing for anti-A and anti-B in IVIG products. 23 laboratories tested candidate IVIG reference preparations consisting of a Positive control, a Negative control and a specifically formulated Limit test reference preparation to define the maximum (e.g., pharmacopoeial) limits of anti-A and anti-B haemagglutinins in IVIG products, where limits are applicable. Laboratories performed direct haemagglutination using papain-treated erythrocytes and/or indirect anti-globulin tests. For both methods, there was up to 16-fold variation in anti-A and anti-B titres, although there was good agreement over a 2-fold titre range for anti-A and anti-B between laboratories using the direct method for both the Positive control and Limit reference preparations. Comparative titration data for the Positive control and Limit reference preparations indicated that the use of a 'Limit' test reference preparation would facilitate identification of higher titre batches when the direct haemagglutination method is used. The Positive control, Negative control and Limit test preparations were adopted in November 2008 by the Commission of the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) as Biological Reference Preparations. The same preparations have been established as reference reagents by the WHO and the U.S FDA, including the maximal specifications defined by the Limit test preparation. This will facilitate global standardisation of haemagglutination tests for anti-A and anti-B, ensure that such tests are sufficiently sensitive and specific, and facilitate identification of batches that exceed maximum recommended levels of anti-A and anti-B antibodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2010 1","pages":"39-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A joint project (coded BSP089) was run by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) of the Council of Europe, the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) on behalf of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to evaluate, in an international collaborative study, 3 lyophilised intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) preparations for their suitability to serve as Reference Preparations to standardise and control the highly variable haemagglutination testing for anti-A and anti-B in IVIG products. 23 laboratories tested candidate IVIG reference preparations consisting of a Positive control, a Negative control and a specifically formulated Limit test reference preparation to define the maximum (e.g., pharmacopoeial) limits of anti-A and anti-B haemagglutinins in IVIG products, where limits are applicable. Laboratories performed direct haemagglutination using papain-treated erythrocytes and/or indirect anti-globulin tests. For both methods, there was up to 16-fold variation in anti-A and anti-B titres, although there was good agreement over a 2-fold titre range for anti-A and anti-B between laboratories using the direct method for both the Positive control and Limit reference preparations. Comparative titration data for the Positive control and Limit reference preparations indicated that the use of a 'Limit' test reference preparation would facilitate identification of higher titre batches when the direct haemagglutination method is used. The Positive control, Negative control and Limit test preparations were adopted in November 2008 by the Commission of the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) as Biological Reference Preparations. The same preparations have been established as reference reagents by the WHO and the U.S FDA, including the maximal specifications defined by the Limit test preparation. This will facilitate global standardisation of haemagglutination tests for anti-A and anti-B, ensure that such tests are sufficiently sensitive and specific, and facilitate identification of batches that exceed maximum recommended levels of anti-A and anti-B antibodies.

建立标准制剂以规范静脉注射正常免疫球蛋白抗a和抗b血凝试验的国际合作研究。
欧洲委员会欧洲药品和保健质量理事会(EDQM)、代表世界卫生组织(WHO)的国家生物标准和控制研究所(NIBSC)和美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的生物制品评价和研究中心(CBER)共同开展了一个联合项目(编号BSP089),以在一项国际合作研究中评估:冻干静脉注射免疫球蛋白制剂(IVIG)适合作为标准制剂,用于标准化和控制IVIG产品中抗a和抗b的高度可变血凝试验。23个实验室测试了候选IVIG参比制剂,包括阳性对照、阴性对照和专门制定的限量试验参比制剂,以确定IVIG产品中抗a和抗b血凝素的最高限量(如药典)。实验室使用木瓜蛋白酶处理的红细胞和/或间接抗球蛋白试验进行直接血凝。对于这两种方法,抗a和抗b滴度的差异高达16倍,尽管在阳性对照和极限参比制剂中使用直接法的实验室之间,抗a和抗b滴度的差异在2倍范围内有很好的一致性。阳性对照和限量参比制剂的比较滴定数据表明,当使用直接血凝法时,使用“限量”试验参比制剂将有助于鉴定高滴度批次。阳性对照、阴性对照和限量试验制剂于2008年11月被欧洲药典委员会(Ph. Eur.)作为生物参比制剂采用。世界卫生组织和美国食品和药物管理局已将相同的制剂确定为参考试剂,包括限量试验制剂定义的最大规格。这将促进抗a和抗b血凝试验的全球标准化,确保此类试验具有足够的敏感性和特异性,并有助于识别超过抗a和抗b抗体最大推荐水平的批次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信