Endovascular coiling in 131 patients with low complication rate justifies treating most unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

V Benes, P Mitchell, A J Molyneux, S A Renowden
{"title":"Endovascular coiling in 131 patients with low complication rate justifies treating most unruptured intracranial aneurysms.","authors":"V Benes,&nbsp;P Mitchell,&nbsp;A J Molyneux,&nbsp;S A Renowden","doi":"10.1055/s-0029-1220938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) remains controversial. The International Study of UIAs (ISUIA) found low rates of rupture and appreciable treatment risks. This finding could be interpreted as suggesting that many UIAs should not be treated. Coiling technology has continuously improved over the years and, since the publication of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial results, increasing numbers of aneurysms have been coiled, and neurointerventional skills have significantly improved. We present the results of endovascular coiling of 131 patients with UIAs from a high volume unit and a risk-benefit analysis based on patient and aneurysm characteristics.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From December 1996 to September 2005, 131 patients (93 women and 38 men, mean age 51 years) with 151 UIAs were treated using detachable coil embolisation. Data on procedural complications, patient and aneurysm characteristics, clinical and radiological follow up were entered into a prospectively collected database. A risk-benefit analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Endovascular treatment was successful in 145 (96 %) aneurysms. One aneurysm ruptured intraoperatively with a fatal outcome. Ten thromboembolic events occurred, leaving one patient moderately disabled. The combined morbidity and mortality rate per patient at 6 months is 1.5 % (95 % confidence interval: 0.07 - 5.7 %). A risk-benefit analysis comparing these data with the published natural history suggests that treatment with low complication rates can be offered to most patients with UIAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UIAs can be coiled with low morbidity and mortality. The risk-benefit analysis suggests that it is reasonable to off er treatment to patients with the exception of patients over 60 years of age with incidentally found aneurysms less than 7 mm in diameter of the anterior circulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51241,"journal":{"name":"Central European Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0029-1220938","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1220938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Background: The management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) remains controversial. The International Study of UIAs (ISUIA) found low rates of rupture and appreciable treatment risks. This finding could be interpreted as suggesting that many UIAs should not be treated. Coiling technology has continuously improved over the years and, since the publication of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial results, increasing numbers of aneurysms have been coiled, and neurointerventional skills have significantly improved. We present the results of endovascular coiling of 131 patients with UIAs from a high volume unit and a risk-benefit analysis based on patient and aneurysm characteristics.

Patients and methods: From December 1996 to September 2005, 131 patients (93 women and 38 men, mean age 51 years) with 151 UIAs were treated using detachable coil embolisation. Data on procedural complications, patient and aneurysm characteristics, clinical and radiological follow up were entered into a prospectively collected database. A risk-benefit analysis was performed.

Findings: Endovascular treatment was successful in 145 (96 %) aneurysms. One aneurysm ruptured intraoperatively with a fatal outcome. Ten thromboembolic events occurred, leaving one patient moderately disabled. The combined morbidity and mortality rate per patient at 6 months is 1.5 % (95 % confidence interval: 0.07 - 5.7 %). A risk-benefit analysis comparing these data with the published natural history suggests that treatment with low complication rates can be offered to most patients with UIAs.

Conclusion: UIAs can be coiled with low morbidity and mortality. The risk-benefit analysis suggests that it is reasonable to off er treatment to patients with the exception of patients over 60 years of age with incidentally found aneurysms less than 7 mm in diameter of the anterior circulation.

在131例并发症发生率低的患者中,血管内栓塞是治疗大多数未破裂颅内动脉瘤的理由。
背景:未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIAs)的治疗仍有争议。国际uia研究(ISUIA)发现低破裂率和明显的治疗风险。这一发现可以解释为许多尿路感染不应该治疗。近年来,盘绕技术不断进步,自国际蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤试验结果发表以来,越来越多的动脉瘤被盘绕,神经介入技术也有了显著提高。我们报告了131例高容量UIAs患者的血管内盘绕的结果,以及基于患者和动脉瘤特征的风险-收益分析。患者和方法:自1996年12月至2005年9月,131例患者(93例女性,38例男性,平均年龄51岁)采用可拆卸线圈栓塞治疗151例uia。手术并发症、患者和动脉瘤特征、临床和放射学随访的数据被输入前瞻性收集的数据库。进行了风险-收益分析。结果:血管内治疗成功145例(96%)动脉瘤。一例动脉瘤术中破裂,结果致命。10例血栓栓塞事件发生,1例患者中度残疾。6个月时每名患者的总发病率和死亡率为1.5%(95%可信区间:0.07 - 5.7%)。一项将这些数据与已发表的自然史进行比较的风险-收益分析表明,大多数uia患者可以接受低并发症率的治疗。结论:尿路感染可卷曲,病死率低。风险-收益分析表明,除了60岁以上偶然发现前循环动脉瘤直径小于7毫米的患者外,对患者停止治疗是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Neurosurgery
Central European Neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信