Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report.

Gert Bronfort, Mitch Haas, Roni Evans, Brent Leininger, Jay Triano
{"title":"Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report.","authors":"Gert Bronfort,&nbsp;Mitch Haas,&nbsp;Roni Evans,&nbsp;Brent Leininger,&nbsp;Jay Triano","doi":"10.1186/1746-1340-18-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this report is to provide a succinct but comprehensive summary of the scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of manual treatment for the management of a variety of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The conclusions are based on the results of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), widely accepted and primarily UK and United States evidence-based clinical guidelines, plus the results of all RCTs not yet included in the first three categories. The strength/quality of the evidence regarding effectiveness was based on an adapted version of the grading system developed by the US Preventive Services Task Force and a study risk of bias assessment tool for the recent RCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By September 2009, 26 categories of conditions were located containing RCT evidence for the use of manual therapy: 13 musculoskeletal conditions, four types of chronic headache and nine non-musculoskeletal conditions. We identified 49 recent relevant systematic reviews and 16 evidence-based clinical guidelines plus an additional 46 RCTs not yet included in systematic reviews and guidelines.Additionally, brief references are made to other effective non-pharmacological, non-invasive physical treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spinal manipulation/mobilization is effective in adults for: acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain; migraine and cervicogenic headache; cervicogenic dizziness; manipulation/mobilization is effective for several extremity joint conditions; and thoracic manipulation/mobilization is effective for acute/subacute neck pain. The evidence is inconclusive for cervical manipulation/mobilization alone for neck pain of any duration, and for manipulation/mobilization for mid back pain, sciatica, tension-type headache, coccydynia, temporomandibular joint disorders, fibromyalgia, premenstrual syndrome, and pneumonia in older adults. Spinal manipulation is not effective for asthma and dysmenorrhea when compared to sham manipulation, or for Stage 1 hypertension when added to an antihypertensive diet. In children, the evidence is inconclusive regarding the effectiveness for otitis media and enuresis, and it is not effective for infantile colic and asthma when compared to sham manipulation.Massage is effective in adults for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain. The evidence is inconclusive for knee osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, myofascial pain syndrome, migraine headache, and premenstrual syndrome. In children, the evidence is inconclusive for asthma and infantile colic.</p>","PeriodicalId":87173,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","volume":"18 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-18-3","citationCount":"427","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-18-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 427

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this report is to provide a succinct but comprehensive summary of the scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of manual treatment for the management of a variety of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions.

Methods: The conclusions are based on the results of systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), widely accepted and primarily UK and United States evidence-based clinical guidelines, plus the results of all RCTs not yet included in the first three categories. The strength/quality of the evidence regarding effectiveness was based on an adapted version of the grading system developed by the US Preventive Services Task Force and a study risk of bias assessment tool for the recent RCTs.

Results: By September 2009, 26 categories of conditions were located containing RCT evidence for the use of manual therapy: 13 musculoskeletal conditions, four types of chronic headache and nine non-musculoskeletal conditions. We identified 49 recent relevant systematic reviews and 16 evidence-based clinical guidelines plus an additional 46 RCTs not yet included in systematic reviews and guidelines.Additionally, brief references are made to other effective non-pharmacological, non-invasive physical treatments.

Conclusions: Spinal manipulation/mobilization is effective in adults for: acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain; migraine and cervicogenic headache; cervicogenic dizziness; manipulation/mobilization is effective for several extremity joint conditions; and thoracic manipulation/mobilization is effective for acute/subacute neck pain. The evidence is inconclusive for cervical manipulation/mobilization alone for neck pain of any duration, and for manipulation/mobilization for mid back pain, sciatica, tension-type headache, coccydynia, temporomandibular joint disorders, fibromyalgia, premenstrual syndrome, and pneumonia in older adults. Spinal manipulation is not effective for asthma and dysmenorrhea when compared to sham manipulation, or for Stage 1 hypertension when added to an antihypertensive diet. In children, the evidence is inconclusive regarding the effectiveness for otitis media and enuresis, and it is not effective for infantile colic and asthma when compared to sham manipulation.Massage is effective in adults for chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain. The evidence is inconclusive for knee osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, myofascial pain syndrome, migraine headache, and premenstrual syndrome. In children, the evidence is inconclusive for asthma and infantile colic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

手工疗法的有效性:英国证据报告。
背景:本报告的目的是提供一个简洁而全面的科学证据的总结,关于手工治疗各种肌肉骨骼和非肌肉骨骼疾病管理的有效性。方法:结论基于随机临床试验(rct)的系统评价结果,这些随机临床试验(rct)被广泛接受,主要是英国和美国的循证临床指南,以及尚未纳入前三类的所有rct的结果。关于有效性的证据的强度/质量是基于美国预防服务工作组开发的分级系统的改编版本和近期随机对照试验的研究偏倚风险评估工具。结果:到2009年9月,26类疾病被定位为包含使用手工疗法的RCT证据:13种肌肉骨骼疾病,4种慢性头痛和9种非肌肉骨骼疾病。我们确定了49项近期相关的系统评价和16项循证临床指南,以及另外46项尚未纳入系统评价和指南的随机对照试验。此外,简要参考了其他有效的非药物,非侵入性物理治疗。结论:脊柱操作/活动对成人急性、亚急性和慢性腰痛有效;偏头痛和颈源性头痛;cervicogenic头晕;手法/活动是有效的几种四肢关节条件;胸部操作/活动对急性/亚急性颈部疼痛有效。对于任何持续时间的颈部疼痛,以及对于老年人中背部疼痛、坐骨神经痛、紧张性头痛、尾骨痛、颞下颌关节紊乱、纤维肌痛、经前综合征和肺炎,单独使用颈椎手法/活动的证据尚无定论。与假手法相比,脊柱手法对哮喘和痛经无效,或与降压饮食结合治疗1期高血压无效。在儿童中,关于中耳炎和遗尿的有效性的证据尚无定论,与假手法相比,它对婴儿绞痛和哮喘无效。按摩是有效的成人慢性腰痛和慢性颈部疼痛。对于膝关节骨关节炎、纤维肌痛、肌筋膜疼痛综合征、偏头痛和经前综合征的证据尚无定论。在儿童中,哮喘和婴儿绞痛的证据尚无定论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信