Real-world car-to-pedestrian-crash data from an urban centre.

Uli Schmucker, Melissa Beirau, Matthias Frank, Dirk Stengel, Gerrit Matthes, Axel Ekkernkamp, Julia Seifert
{"title":"Real-world car-to-pedestrian-crash data from an urban centre.","authors":"Uli Schmucker,&nbsp;Melissa Beirau,&nbsp;Matthias Frank,&nbsp;Dirk Stengel,&nbsp;Gerrit Matthes,&nbsp;Axel Ekkernkamp,&nbsp;Julia Seifert","doi":"10.1186/1752-2897-4-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pedestrians are at a high risk for crash and injury. This study aims at comparing data from real world crashes with data gathered from experimental settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IMPAIR (In-Depth Medical Pedestrian Accident Investigation and Reconstruction) was a prospective, observational study performed in a metropolitan area. Data was collected on-scene, from clinical records, and interviews. Data comprise crash data, details on injury pattern and injury severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven pedestrians (of which 19 males) with a mean 37.1 years of age were included in the study. The mean collision speed was 49.5 km/h (SD 13.7, range, 28 - 93). The mean ISS (31.0, SD 25.4) and the 24% fatality rate indicate a substantial trauma load. The most common AIS 4+ injuries were to the head (23 subjects), followed by chest (8), pelvis (4), and abdomen (2). An association of impact side and injury side (right/left) was found for abdominal, chest, pelvic, and upper limb injuries. Primary head impacts were documented on the windscreen (19 subjects), hood (10), A-pillar (2), and edge of the car roof (2). With bivariate analysis, a significant increase of MAIS 4+ head injury risk was found for collision speeds of >40 km/h (OR 9.00, 95% CI 1.96-41.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The real-world data from this study is in agreement with previous findings from biomechanical models and other simulations. This data suggest that there may be reason to include further pedestrian regulations in EuroNCAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":87652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","volume":"4 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1752-2897-4-2","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-4-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: Pedestrians are at a high risk for crash and injury. This study aims at comparing data from real world crashes with data gathered from experimental settings.

Methods: IMPAIR (In-Depth Medical Pedestrian Accident Investigation and Reconstruction) was a prospective, observational study performed in a metropolitan area. Data was collected on-scene, from clinical records, and interviews. Data comprise crash data, details on injury pattern and injury severity.

Results: Thirty-seven pedestrians (of which 19 males) with a mean 37.1 years of age were included in the study. The mean collision speed was 49.5 km/h (SD 13.7, range, 28 - 93). The mean ISS (31.0, SD 25.4) and the 24% fatality rate indicate a substantial trauma load. The most common AIS 4+ injuries were to the head (23 subjects), followed by chest (8), pelvis (4), and abdomen (2). An association of impact side and injury side (right/left) was found for abdominal, chest, pelvic, and upper limb injuries. Primary head impacts were documented on the windscreen (19 subjects), hood (10), A-pillar (2), and edge of the car roof (2). With bivariate analysis, a significant increase of MAIS 4+ head injury risk was found for collision speeds of >40 km/h (OR 9.00, 95% CI 1.96-41.36).

Conclusion: The real-world data from this study is in agreement with previous findings from biomechanical models and other simulations. This data suggest that there may be reason to include further pedestrian regulations in EuroNCAP.

Abstract Image

来自城市中心的真实世界汽车与行人碰撞数据。
背景:行人发生碰撞和受伤的风险很高。这项研究的目的是比较真实世界的崩溃数据和从实验环境中收集的数据。方法:损伤(深度医疗行人事故调查与重建)是一项在大都市地区进行的前瞻性观察研究。数据从现场、临床记录和访谈中收集。数据包括碰撞数据,损伤模式和损伤严重程度的详细信息。结果:共纳入37名行人,其中男性19名,平均年龄37.1岁。平均碰撞速度为49.5 km/h(标准差13.7,范围28 ~ 93)。平均ISS (31.0, SD 25.4)和24%的死亡率表明创伤负荷很大。最常见的AIS 4+损伤是头部(23例),其次是胸部(8例)、骨盆(4例)和腹部(2例)。腹部、胸部、骨盆和上肢损伤与撞击侧和损伤侧(右/左)有关。主要的头部碰撞记录在挡风玻璃(19名受试者)、引擎盖(10名受试者)、a柱(2名受试者)和车顶边缘(2名受试者)。通过双变量分析,发现碰撞速度>40 km/h时MAIS 4+头部损伤风险显著增加(OR 9.00, 95% CI 1.96-41.36)。结论:本研究的真实数据与之前的生物力学模型和其他模拟结果一致。这一数据表明,可能有理由在EuroNCAP中纳入进一步的行人法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书