The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: course patterns established through weekly follow-ups in patients treated for low back pain.

Alice Kongsted, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
{"title":"The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: course patterns established through weekly follow-ups in patients treated for low back pain.","authors":"Alice Kongsted,&nbsp;Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde","doi":"10.1186/1746-1340-18-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is known to have a fluctuating course. In clinical studies, when deciding on duration of treatment and time for follow-up, it is important to know at what point in time a definite pattern of recovery becomes apparent and at what time a possible recurrence is likely to occur. A detailed description of the pain pattern has been difficult to establish with commonly used methods for follow-up, and we now introduce data collection by means of text messaging on mobile phones. The purpose of this study was to describe the detailed course of LBP during 18 weeks in a population treated in the primary care sector by chiropractors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population consisted of 78 patients presenting to a chiropractor with LBP, who for at least 12 weeks responded to the questions sent by text messaging concerning 1) the number of LBP-days the preceding week and 2) the intensity of present LBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A rapid improvement was observed through weeks one to four. After week seven no further improvement happened, and from the 12(th )week there seemed to be a tendency towards worsening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We suggest that follow-ups in studies concerning primary sector LBP care are conducted in week seven after treatment was initiated and at some later point which cannot be established from this study. In clinical practice we recommend that patients' LBP status is systematically followed for the first four weeks since lack of improvement during that period should cause watchfulness.</p>","PeriodicalId":87173,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-18-2","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-18-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is known to have a fluctuating course. In clinical studies, when deciding on duration of treatment and time for follow-up, it is important to know at what point in time a definite pattern of recovery becomes apparent and at what time a possible recurrence is likely to occur. A detailed description of the pain pattern has been difficult to establish with commonly used methods for follow-up, and we now introduce data collection by means of text messaging on mobile phones. The purpose of this study was to describe the detailed course of LBP during 18 weeks in a population treated in the primary care sector by chiropractors.

Methods: The study population consisted of 78 patients presenting to a chiropractor with LBP, who for at least 12 weeks responded to the questions sent by text messaging concerning 1) the number of LBP-days the preceding week and 2) the intensity of present LBP.

Results: A rapid improvement was observed through weeks one to four. After week seven no further improvement happened, and from the 12(th )week there seemed to be a tendency towards worsening.

Conclusions: We suggest that follow-ups in studies concerning primary sector LBP care are conducted in week seven after treatment was initiated and at some later point which cannot be established from this study. In clinical practice we recommend that patients' LBP status is systematically followed for the first four weeks since lack of improvement during that period should cause watchfulness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

北欧腰痛亚群项目:通过每周随访治疗腰痛的患者建立病程模式。
背景:众所周知,腰痛(LBP)有一个波动的过程。在临床研究中,当决定治疗的持续时间和随访的时间时,重要的是要知道在什么时间点有明确的恢复模式变得明显,什么时候可能发生复发。对疼痛模式的详细描述很难用常用的随访方法来建立,现在我们通过手机短信的方式来介绍数据收集。本研究的目的是描述在初级保健部门接受脊医治疗的人群18周内腰痛的详细病程。方法:研究人群由78名腰痛患者组成,这些患者在至少12周的时间里通过短信回答了以下问题:1)前一周腰痛天数和2)当前腰痛强度。结果:在第1至第4周观察到快速改善。第7周后没有进一步的改善,从第12周开始,似乎有恶化的趋势。结论:我们建议在初级部门LBP护理的研究中,在治疗开始后的第7周进行随访,并在一些不能从本研究中确定的晚些时候进行随访。在临床实践中,我们建议在头四周系统地跟踪患者的LBP状态,因为在此期间缺乏改善应该引起警惕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信