A triad of evidence for care of women with genital piercings.

Cathy Young, Myrna L Armstrong, Alden E Roberts, Inola Mello, Elayne Angel
{"title":"A triad of evidence for care of women with genital piercings.","authors":"Cathy Young,&nbsp;Myrna L Armstrong,&nbsp;Alden E Roberts,&nbsp;Inola Mello,&nbsp;Elayne Angel","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00479.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To add three further dimensions of evidence for the care of women with genital piercings (GPs).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Following a literature review, a cross-sectional study replicated previous work, using a web-based survey. This triad of evidence provides (a) descriptive quantitative data (N = 240) about women with GPs, (b) qualitative data about women with GPs, as well as (c) clinical observations from 60 healthcare providers (HCPs) who have cared for women with GPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three important findings about women with GPs were validated: (a) GPs were deliberate actions, sought for personal and sexual expression; (b) women with GPs treat piercings as a normal, meaningful part of their lives which produce sexual enhancement and expression; and (c) they continue to seek information about GP care from nonhealth providers. New data indicate that they have experienced depression (47%), abuse (physical 18%; emotional, 27%; sexual, 14%), and forced sexual activity (35%) in their lives. Several unsubstantiated assumptions about women with GPs are challenged with these data.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>GPs should not delay important health care. Health-protective, as well as health promotion, behaviors are important to reduce risks. Nurse practitioners (NPs) can become effective and resourceful advocates in three specific areas of care: (a) responsiveness to women with GPs, (b) collaborative decision making for the removal of jewelry, and (c) promotion of applicable patient education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","volume":"22 2","pages":"70-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00479.x","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00479.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Purpose: To add three further dimensions of evidence for the care of women with genital piercings (GPs).

Data sources: Following a literature review, a cross-sectional study replicated previous work, using a web-based survey. This triad of evidence provides (a) descriptive quantitative data (N = 240) about women with GPs, (b) qualitative data about women with GPs, as well as (c) clinical observations from 60 healthcare providers (HCPs) who have cared for women with GPs.

Conclusions: Three important findings about women with GPs were validated: (a) GPs were deliberate actions, sought for personal and sexual expression; (b) women with GPs treat piercings as a normal, meaningful part of their lives which produce sexual enhancement and expression; and (c) they continue to seek information about GP care from nonhealth providers. New data indicate that they have experienced depression (47%), abuse (physical 18%; emotional, 27%; sexual, 14%), and forced sexual activity (35%) in their lives. Several unsubstantiated assumptions about women with GPs are challenged with these data.

Implications for practice: GPs should not delay important health care. Health-protective, as well as health promotion, behaviors are important to reduce risks. Nurse practitioners (NPs) can become effective and resourceful advocates in three specific areas of care: (a) responsiveness to women with GPs, (b) collaborative decision making for the removal of jewelry, and (c) promotion of applicable patient education.

照顾有生殖器穿孔的妇女的三个证据。
目的:为女性生殖器穿孔(GPs)的护理增加三个进一步的证据维度。数据来源:在文献回顾之后,横断面研究使用基于网络的调查重复了先前的工作。这三个证据提供了(a)关于全科医生妇女的描述性定量数据(N = 240), (b)关于全科医生妇女的定性数据,以及(c)来自60名照顾过全科医生妇女的卫生保健提供者(HCPs)的临床观察。结论:对妇女全科医生的三个重要发现进行了验证:(a)全科医生是故意的行为,寻求个人和性表达;(b)接受全科医生治疗的妇女视穿孔为生活中正常而有意义的一部分,以增强和表达性;(c)他们继续从非健康提供者那里寻求关于全科医生护理的信息。新的数据表明,他们经历过抑郁(47%)、虐待(身体虐待18%;情感、27%;性行为(14%)和强迫性行为(35%)。这些数据挑战了一些关于女性全科医生的未经证实的假设。对实践的启示:全科医生不应延误重要的卫生保健。保护健康和促进健康的行为对减少风险很重要。护士从业人员(NPs)可以在三个特定的护理领域成为有效和足智多才的倡导者:(a)对有全科医生的妇女的响应,(b)对摘掉珠宝的协作决策,以及(c)促进适用的患者教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信