Comparative in vitro study of the antimicrobial activities of different commercial antibiotic products for intravenous administration.

Edelberto Silva, Jorge A Díaz, María J Arias, Angela P Hernández, Andrés de la Torre
{"title":"Comparative in vitro study of the antimicrobial activities of different commercial antibiotic products for intravenous administration.","authors":"Edelberto Silva,&nbsp;Jorge A Díaz,&nbsp;María J Arias,&nbsp;Angela P Hernández,&nbsp;Andrés de la Torre","doi":"10.1186/1472-6904-10-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The antimicrobial resistance is a global problem, probably due to the indiscriminate and irrational use of antibiotics, prescriptions for incorrect medicines or incorrect determinations of dose, route and/or duration. Another consideration is the uncertainty of patients receiving antibiotics about whether the quality of a generic medicine is equal to, greater than or less than its equivalent brand-name drug. The antibiotics behaviors must be evaluated in vitro and in vivo in order to confirm their suitability for therapeutic use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The antimicrobial activities of Meropenem and Piperacillin/Tazobactam were studied by microbiological assays to determine their potencies (content), minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), critical concentrations and capacity to produce spontaneous drug-resistant mutants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With respect to potency (content) all the products fulfill USP requirements, so they should all be considered pharmaceutical equivalents. The MIC values of the samples evaluated (trade marks and generics) were the same for each strain tested, indicating that all products behaved similarly. The critical concentration values were very similar for all samples, and the ratios between the critical concentration of the standard and those of each sample were similar to the ratios of their specific antibiotic contents. Overall, therefore, the results showed no significant differences among samples. Finally, the production of spontaneous mutants did not differ significantly among the samples evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All the samples are pharmaceutical equivalents and the products can be used in antimicrobial therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9196,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"10 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6904-10-3","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-10-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Background: The antimicrobial resistance is a global problem, probably due to the indiscriminate and irrational use of antibiotics, prescriptions for incorrect medicines or incorrect determinations of dose, route and/or duration. Another consideration is the uncertainty of patients receiving antibiotics about whether the quality of a generic medicine is equal to, greater than or less than its equivalent brand-name drug. The antibiotics behaviors must be evaluated in vitro and in vivo in order to confirm their suitability for therapeutic use.

Methods: The antimicrobial activities of Meropenem and Piperacillin/Tazobactam were studied by microbiological assays to determine their potencies (content), minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), critical concentrations and capacity to produce spontaneous drug-resistant mutants.

Results: With respect to potency (content) all the products fulfill USP requirements, so they should all be considered pharmaceutical equivalents. The MIC values of the samples evaluated (trade marks and generics) were the same for each strain tested, indicating that all products behaved similarly. The critical concentration values were very similar for all samples, and the ratios between the critical concentration of the standard and those of each sample were similar to the ratios of their specific antibiotic contents. Overall, therefore, the results showed no significant differences among samples. Finally, the production of spontaneous mutants did not differ significantly among the samples evaluated.

Conclusions: All the samples are pharmaceutical equivalents and the products can be used in antimicrobial therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同商业静脉给药抗生素产品抑菌活性的体外比较研究。
背景:抗菌素耐药性是一个全球性问题,可能是由于滥用和不合理使用抗生素,处方不正确或剂量、途径和/或持续时间的确定不正确所致。另一个需要考虑的问题是,接受抗生素治疗的患者对于仿制药的质量是否等于、大于或小于同等品牌药的不确定性。必须对抗生素在体内和体外的行为进行评估,以确定其是否适合用于治疗。方法:采用微生物学方法研究美罗培南和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的抑菌活性,测定其效价(含量)、最低抑菌浓度(mic)、临界浓度和自发产生耐药突变体的能力。结果:就效价(含量)而言,所有产品都符合USP要求,因此它们都应该被认为是等效药物。评估样品(商标和仿制药)的MIC值对于每个测试菌株都是相同的,表明所有产品的行为相似。各样品的临界浓度值非常相似,各样品的标准临界浓度与各样品的标准临界浓度之比与其特异性抗生素含量之比相似。因此,总体而言,结果显示样本之间没有显着差异。最后,在评估的样品中,自发突变体的产生没有显着差异。结论:所有样品均具有药物等效性,产品可用于抗菌治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信