Composite functional genetic and comedication CYP2D6 activity score in predicting tamoxifen drug exposure among breast cancer patients.

IF 2.3 4区 医学
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2010-04-01 Epub Date: 2010-01-15 DOI:10.1177/0091270009359182
Silvana Borges, Zeruesenay Desta, Yan Jin, Azzouz Faouzi, Jason D Robarge, Sanosh Philips, Santosh Philip, Anne Nguyen, Vered Stearns, Daniel Hayes, James M Rae, Todd C Skaar, David A Flockhart, Lang Li
{"title":"Composite functional genetic and comedication CYP2D6 activity score in predicting tamoxifen drug exposure among breast cancer patients.","authors":"Silvana Borges, Zeruesenay Desta, Yan Jin, Azzouz Faouzi, Jason D Robarge, Sanosh Philips, Santosh Philip, Anne Nguyen, Vered Stearns, Daniel Hayes, James M Rae, Todd C Skaar, David A Flockhart, Lang Li","doi":"10.1177/0091270009359182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate assessment of CYP2D6 phenotypes from genotype is inadequate in patients taking CYP2D6 substrate together with CYP2D6 inhibitors. A novel CYP2D6 scoring system is proposed that incorporates the impact of concomitant medications with the genotype in calculating the CYP2D6 activity score. Training (n = 159) and validation (n = 81) data sets were obtained from a prospective cohort tamoxifen pharmacogenetics registry. Two inhibitor factors were defined: 1 genotype independent and 1 genotype based. Three CYP2D6 gene scoring systems, and their combination with the inhibitor factors, were compared. These 3 scores were based on Zineh, Zanger, and Gaedigk's approaches. Endoxifen/NDM-Tam plasma ratio was used as the phenotype. The overall performance of the 3 gene scoring systems without consideration of CYP2D6-inhibiting medications in predicting CYP2D6 phenotype was poor in both the training set (R(2) = 0.24, 0.22, and 0.18) and the validation set (R(2) = 0.30, 0.24, and 0.15). Once the CYP2D6 genotype-independent inhibitor factor was integrated into the score calculation, the R(2) values in the training and validation data sets were nearly twice as high as the genotype-only scoring model: (0.44, 0.43, 0.38) and (0.53, 0.50, 0.41), respectively. The integration of the inhibitory effect of concomitant medications with the CYP2D6 genotype into the composite CYP2D6 activity score doubled the ability to predict the CYP2D6 phenotype. However, endoxifen phenotypes still varied substantially, even with incorporation of CYD2D6 genotype and inhibiting factors, suggesting that other, as yet unidentified factors must be involved in tamoxifen activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"50 4","pages":"450-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3816977/pdf/nihms220544.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270009359182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate assessment of CYP2D6 phenotypes from genotype is inadequate in patients taking CYP2D6 substrate together with CYP2D6 inhibitors. A novel CYP2D6 scoring system is proposed that incorporates the impact of concomitant medications with the genotype in calculating the CYP2D6 activity score. Training (n = 159) and validation (n = 81) data sets were obtained from a prospective cohort tamoxifen pharmacogenetics registry. Two inhibitor factors were defined: 1 genotype independent and 1 genotype based. Three CYP2D6 gene scoring systems, and their combination with the inhibitor factors, were compared. These 3 scores were based on Zineh, Zanger, and Gaedigk's approaches. Endoxifen/NDM-Tam plasma ratio was used as the phenotype. The overall performance of the 3 gene scoring systems without consideration of CYP2D6-inhibiting medications in predicting CYP2D6 phenotype was poor in both the training set (R(2) = 0.24, 0.22, and 0.18) and the validation set (R(2) = 0.30, 0.24, and 0.15). Once the CYP2D6 genotype-independent inhibitor factor was integrated into the score calculation, the R(2) values in the training and validation data sets were nearly twice as high as the genotype-only scoring model: (0.44, 0.43, 0.38) and (0.53, 0.50, 0.41), respectively. The integration of the inhibitory effect of concomitant medications with the CYP2D6 genotype into the composite CYP2D6 activity score doubled the ability to predict the CYP2D6 phenotype. However, endoxifen phenotypes still varied substantially, even with incorporation of CYD2D6 genotype and inhibiting factors, suggesting that other, as yet unidentified factors must be involved in tamoxifen activation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

综合功能遗传和药物CYP2D6活性评分预测乳腺癌患者他莫昔芬药物暴露
在同时服用CYP2D6底物和CYP2D6抑制剂的患者中,从基因型中准确评估CYP2D6表型是不够的。提出了一种新的CYP2D6评分系统,该系统在计算CYP2D6活性评分时结合了伴随药物和基因型的影响。训练(n = 159)和验证(n = 81)数据集来自前瞻性队列他莫昔芬药物遗传学登记处。定义了两种抑制因子:1种与基因型无关,1种与基因型相关。比较了三种CYP2D6基因评分系统及其与抑制因子的结合。这三个分数是基于Zineh, Zanger和Gaedigk的方法。Endoxifen/NDM-Tam血浆比值作为表型。不考虑CYP2D6抑制药物的3种基因评分系统在预测CYP2D6表型方面的总体表现在训练集(R(2) = 0.24, 0.22和0.18)和验证集(R(2) = 0.30, 0.24和0.15)中都很差。将与CYP2D6基因型无关的抑制剂因子纳入评分计算后,训练和验证数据集中的R(2)值几乎是仅基因型评分模型的两倍:分别为(0.44,0.43,0.38)和(0.53,0.50,0.41)。将伴随药物的抑制作用与CYP2D6基因型整合到CYP2D6活性综合评分中,使预测CYP2D6表型的能力增加了一倍。然而,即使合并了CYD2D6基因型和抑制因子,内氧昔芬的表型仍然存在很大差异,这表明其他尚未确定的因素一定参与了他莫昔芬的激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书