Dental maturation in patients with unilateral posterior crossbite.

World journal of orthodontics Pub Date : 2009-01-01
Tancan Uysal, Ahmet Yagci, Sabri Ilhan Ramoglu
{"title":"Dental maturation in patients with unilateral posterior crossbite.","authors":"Tancan Uysal,&nbsp;Ahmet Yagci,&nbsp;Sabri Ilhan Ramoglu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate whether there is a difference in dental maturation between patients with a skeletal unilateral crossbite and a control sample (individuals with an Angle Class I and no crossbite) and to compare the dental maturation on the right and left posterior segments in both samples.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 101 Turkish individuals (53 boys and 48 girls, 8 to 13 years of age, mean age 10.90 ± 1.62 years). These subjects were divided into two groups: unilateral posterior crossbite (23 boys and 28 girls, mean age 10.87 ± 2.01 years) and control (25 boys and 25 girls, mean age 10.93 ± 1.14 years). Each subject's dental age (according to Demirjian's dental maturity score) was determined with an orthopantomogram. A difference of 6 months at a significance level of P<.05 was considered clinically significant, so the power of the statistical test was 85%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No sexual dimorphism was detected for the chronological or dental age in either group. In both groups, the dental ages determined from Demirjian and Goldstein's tables were more advanced than the chronological ages. Dental age did not differ significantly between sides. Subjects with a posterior crossbite had a tendency for a delayed dental maturation compared to the control individuals. A difference of about 1 month was observed between the right and left sides in the crossbite and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The difference in dental age between the crossbite and control groups was big enough to be clinically relevant. No significant side differences in either group were detected.</p>","PeriodicalId":87213,"journal":{"name":"World journal of orthodontics","volume":"10 4","pages":"383-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To investigate whether there is a difference in dental maturation between patients with a skeletal unilateral crossbite and a control sample (individuals with an Angle Class I and no crossbite) and to compare the dental maturation on the right and left posterior segments in both samples.

Materials and methods: The sample consisted of 101 Turkish individuals (53 boys and 48 girls, 8 to 13 years of age, mean age 10.90 ± 1.62 years). These subjects were divided into two groups: unilateral posterior crossbite (23 boys and 28 girls, mean age 10.87 ± 2.01 years) and control (25 boys and 25 girls, mean age 10.93 ± 1.14 years). Each subject's dental age (according to Demirjian's dental maturity score) was determined with an orthopantomogram. A difference of 6 months at a significance level of P<.05 was considered clinically significant, so the power of the statistical test was 85%.

Results: No sexual dimorphism was detected for the chronological or dental age in either group. In both groups, the dental ages determined from Demirjian and Goldstein's tables were more advanced than the chronological ages. Dental age did not differ significantly between sides. Subjects with a posterior crossbite had a tendency for a delayed dental maturation compared to the control individuals. A difference of about 1 month was observed between the right and left sides in the crossbite and control groups.

Conclusion: The difference in dental age between the crossbite and control groups was big enough to be clinically relevant. No significant side differences in either group were detected.

单侧后牙合患者的牙齿成熟。
目的:探讨单侧骨交叉咬合患者与对照样本(角1级和无交叉咬合个体)的牙成熟是否存在差异,并比较两组样本的左右后段牙成熟情况。材料与方法:本组共101例土耳其人,男53例,女48例,年龄8 ~ 13岁,平均年龄10.90±1.62岁。患者分为单侧后牙合组(男孩23例,女孩28例,平均年龄10.87±2.01岁)和对照组(男孩25例,女孩25例,平均年龄10.93±1.14岁)。每个受试者的牙齿年龄(根据Demirjian的牙齿成熟度评分)通过骨断层扫描确定。结果:两组在年龄和牙龄上均未发现性别二态性。在这两组中,从Demirjian和Goldstein的表中确定的牙齿年龄都比实际年龄要早。两侧牙龄无明显差异。与对照组相比,有后牙合的受试者有延迟牙齿成熟的趋势。与对照组相比,左、右侧牙槽磨合时间相差约1个月。结论:牙合组与对照组牙龄差异较大,具有临床意义。两组间均未发现明显的侧差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信