Autologous blood injection in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

S M Jazayeri, S Azizi, A R Moghtaderi
{"title":"Autologous blood injection in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).","authors":"S M Jazayeri,&nbsp;S Azizi,&nbsp;A R Moghtaderi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most medical treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) have focused on suppressing the inflammatory process. An injection of autologous blood might provide the necessary cellular and humoral mediators to induce a healing cascade. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively autologous blood injection in CTS.</p><p><strong>Method & materials: </strong>Twenty patients with CTS were recruited using strict inclusion and exclusion criterias. All patients were injected with 1 ml of autologous blood and 0.5 ml lidocaeine 1% under the carpal tunnel. Pain intensity (based on VAS) and electrophysiologic parameters of median nerve (transcarpal SNCV, DML and DSL) were recorded before and 3 weeks after autologous blood injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average pain scores before and 3 weeks after autologous blood injection was 8.70 +/- 0.92 and 4.30 +/- 0.76 respectively (P < 0.005). Also transcarpal SNCV of median nerve was 33.7 +/- 6.3 m/s and 24.5 +/- 6.8 m/s (P = 0.001); DML of medin nerve was 5.16 +/- 1.04 ms and 4.70 +/- 0.53 ms (P = 0.001) and DSL of median nerve was 4.84 +/- 0.77 ms and 4.2 +/- 0.6 ms (P = 0.001), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After autologous blood injection, pain intensity and electerophysiologic parameters were significantly improved. This study offers encouraging results for an alternative minimally invasive treatment for CTS. This study cannot prove conclusively whether the blood itself induced an inflammatory cascade or the injury created by the injection was responsible.</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"49 8","pages":"369-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Most medical treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) have focused on suppressing the inflammatory process. An injection of autologous blood might provide the necessary cellular and humoral mediators to induce a healing cascade. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively autologous blood injection in CTS.

Method & materials: Twenty patients with CTS were recruited using strict inclusion and exclusion criterias. All patients were injected with 1 ml of autologous blood and 0.5 ml lidocaeine 1% under the carpal tunnel. Pain intensity (based on VAS) and electrophysiologic parameters of median nerve (transcarpal SNCV, DML and DSL) were recorded before and 3 weeks after autologous blood injection.

Results: The average pain scores before and 3 weeks after autologous blood injection was 8.70 +/- 0.92 and 4.30 +/- 0.76 respectively (P < 0.005). Also transcarpal SNCV of median nerve was 33.7 +/- 6.3 m/s and 24.5 +/- 6.8 m/s (P = 0.001); DML of medin nerve was 5.16 +/- 1.04 ms and 4.70 +/- 0.53 ms (P = 0.001) and DSL of median nerve was 4.84 +/- 0.77 ms and 4.2 +/- 0.6 ms (P = 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions: After autologous blood injection, pain intensity and electerophysiologic parameters were significantly improved. This study offers encouraging results for an alternative minimally invasive treatment for CTS. This study cannot prove conclusively whether the blood itself induced an inflammatory cascade or the injury created by the injection was responsible.

自体血液注射治疗腕管综合征。
简介:大多数腕管综合征(CTS)的医学治疗都集中在抑制炎症过程上。注射自体血液可能提供必要的细胞和体液介质来诱导愈合级联反应。本研究的目的是评估自体血液注射治疗CTS的前瞻性。方法与材料:采用严格的纳入和排除标准,纳入20例CTS患者。所有患者均在腕管下注射1 ml自体血和0.5 ml 1%利多卡因。记录自体血液注射前和注射后3周正中神经(经头皮SNCV、DML和DSL)的疼痛强度(基于VAS)和电生理参数。结果:自体血注射前和注射后3周的平均疼痛评分分别为8.70 +/- 0.92和4.30 +/- 0.76 (P < 0.005)。正中神经经腕膜SNCV分别为33.7 +/- 6.3 m/s和24.5 +/- 6.8 m/s (P = 0.001);正中神经DML分别为5.16 +/- 1.04 ms和4.70 +/- 0.53 ms (P = 0.001),正中神经DML分别为4.84 +/- 0.77 ms和4.2 +/- 0.6 ms (P = 0.001)。结论:自体血注射后疼痛强度和电生理参数均有明显改善。本研究为CTS的替代微创治疗提供了令人鼓舞的结果。这项研究不能最终证明是血液本身引起了炎症级联,还是注射造成的损伤起了作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信