Antipsychotic polypharmacy in outpatients at Birch Hill Hospital: incidence and adherence to guidelines.

IF 2.3 4区 医学
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2010-06-01 Epub Date: 2010-01-07 DOI:10.1177/0091270009350625
Nadezda Ranceva, Wasim Ashraf, Deji Odelola
{"title":"Antipsychotic polypharmacy in outpatients at Birch Hill Hospital: incidence and adherence to guidelines.","authors":"Nadezda Ranceva,&nbsp;Wasim Ashraf,&nbsp;Deji Odelola","doi":"10.1177/0091270009350625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this article is to determine prescribing rates and adherence to guidelines with regard to antipsychotic polypharmacy, high-dose prescribing, and sedative use in an outpatient population. A prospective case-note audit involving 250 consecutive attendees of an outpatient clinic was carried out. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. Differences between the groups were estimated using t test and chi(2) where applicable. Results showed that the rate of polypharmacy was 17.4%. Reasons for polypharmacy were documented in 53% of cases. High-dose antipsychotics were used in 2.5% of the monotherapy group and in 38% of the polypharmacy group. An ECG was done in 35% of patients on high-dose antipsychotic therapy. In the monotherapy group, 6.2% versus 26.5% in the polypharmacy group of patients were on at least 1 sedative or hypnotic (odds ratio [OR], 5.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02-14.82; P < .001). Forty-two percent of patients prescribed sedatives had schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and none of the patients were diagnosed with anxiety disorders. The current study confirms that despite repeated recommendations against the practice, polypharmacy rates remain consistent at the 20% level. Thorough documentation, calculating the total antipsychotic dose, and obtaining an ECG would constitute good practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"50 6","pages":"699-704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091270009350625","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270009350625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to determine prescribing rates and adherence to guidelines with regard to antipsychotic polypharmacy, high-dose prescribing, and sedative use in an outpatient population. A prospective case-note audit involving 250 consecutive attendees of an outpatient clinic was carried out. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. Differences between the groups were estimated using t test and chi(2) where applicable. Results showed that the rate of polypharmacy was 17.4%. Reasons for polypharmacy were documented in 53% of cases. High-dose antipsychotics were used in 2.5% of the monotherapy group and in 38% of the polypharmacy group. An ECG was done in 35% of patients on high-dose antipsychotic therapy. In the monotherapy group, 6.2% versus 26.5% in the polypharmacy group of patients were on at least 1 sedative or hypnotic (odds ratio [OR], 5.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02-14.82; P < .001). Forty-two percent of patients prescribed sedatives had schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and none of the patients were diagnosed with anxiety disorders. The current study confirms that despite repeated recommendations against the practice, polypharmacy rates remain consistent at the 20% level. Thorough documentation, calculating the total antipsychotic dose, and obtaining an ECG would constitute good practice.

桦树山医院门诊患者的抗精神病药物综合用药:发生率和对指南的依从性
这篇文章的目的是确定处方率和遵守指南关于抗精神病药物,大剂量处方和镇静剂的使用门诊人群。一项前瞻性病例记录审计涉及门诊诊所的250名连续与会者进行。数据分析采用描述性统计方法。组间差异估计使用t检验和chi(2)(如适用)。结果显示,多药配药率为17.4%。53%的病例记录了多重用药的原因。2.5%的单药组和38%的复方组使用大剂量抗精神病药物。35%接受大剂量抗精神病药物治疗的患者做了心电图检查。在单药组中,6.2%的患者使用至少一种镇静剂或催眠药,而在多药组中,26.5%的患者使用至少一种镇静剂或催眠药(优势比[or], 5.47;95%置信区间[CI], 2.02-14.82;P < 0.001)。服用镇静剂的患者中有42%患有精神分裂症谱系障碍,没有一个患者被诊断患有焦虑症。目前的研究证实,尽管一再建议反对这种做法,但多种用药的比率仍然保持在20%的水平。完整的文件记录,计算总抗精神病药物剂量,并获得心电图将是良好的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书