How and when the fMRI BOLD signal relates to underlying neural activity: The danger in dissociation

Arne Ekstrom
{"title":"How and when the fMRI BOLD signal relates to underlying neural activity: The danger in dissociation","authors":"Arne Ekstrom","doi":"10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become the dominant means of measuring behavior-related neural activity in the human brain. Yet the relation between the blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal and underlying neural activity remains an open and actively researched question. A widely accepted model, established for sensory neo-cortex, suggests that the BOLD signal reflects peri-synaptic activity in the form of the local field potential rather than the spiking rate of individual neurons. Several recent experimental results, however, suggest situations in which BOLD, spiking, and the local field potential dissociate. Two different models are discussed, based on the literature reviewed to account for this dissociation, a circuitry-based and vascular-based explanation. Both models are found to account for existing data under some testing situations and in certain brain regions. Because both the vascular and local circuitry-based explanations challenge the BOLD-LFP coupling model, these models provide guidance in predicting when BOLD can be expected to reflect neural processing and when the underlying relation with BOLD may be more complex than a direct correspondence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9291,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research Reviews","volume":"62 2","pages":"Pages 233-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.12.004","citationCount":"312","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165017309001325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 312

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become the dominant means of measuring behavior-related neural activity in the human brain. Yet the relation between the blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal and underlying neural activity remains an open and actively researched question. A widely accepted model, established for sensory neo-cortex, suggests that the BOLD signal reflects peri-synaptic activity in the form of the local field potential rather than the spiking rate of individual neurons. Several recent experimental results, however, suggest situations in which BOLD, spiking, and the local field potential dissociate. Two different models are discussed, based on the literature reviewed to account for this dissociation, a circuitry-based and vascular-based explanation. Both models are found to account for existing data under some testing situations and in certain brain regions. Because both the vascular and local circuitry-based explanations challenge the BOLD-LFP coupling model, these models provide guidance in predicting when BOLD can be expected to reflect neural processing and when the underlying relation with BOLD may be more complex than a direct correspondence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

fMRI BOLD信号如何以及何时与潜在的神经活动相关:分离的危险
功能磁共振成像(fMRI)已成为测量人脑中与行为相关的神经活动的主要手段。然而,血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号与潜在的神经活动之间的关系仍然是一个开放和积极研究的问题。一个为感觉新皮层建立的被广泛接受的模型表明,BOLD信号以局部场电位的形式反映突触周围的活动,而不是单个神经元的峰值速率。然而,最近的几个实验结果表明,在BOLD、尖峰和局部场电位分离的情况下。根据文献综述,讨论了两种不同的模型,以解释这种分离,基于电路和基于血管的解释。研究发现,这两种模型都能解释某些测试情况下和某些大脑区域的现有数据。由于基于血管和局部电路的解释都挑战了BOLD- lfp耦合模型,这些模型为预测BOLD何时可以反映神经处理以及何时与BOLD的潜在关系可能比直接对应更复杂提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Research Reviews
Brain Research Reviews 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信