Implementation of a critical incident reporting system in a neurosurgical department.

Central European Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2011-02-01 Epub Date: 2009-12-18 DOI:10.1055/s-0029-1243199
P Kantelhardt, M Müller, A Giese, V Rohde, S R Kantelhardt
{"title":"Implementation of a critical incident reporting system in a neurosurgical department.","authors":"P Kantelhardt,&nbsp;M Müller,&nbsp;A Giese,&nbsp;V Rohde,&nbsp;S R Kantelhardt","doi":"10.1055/s-0029-1243199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critical incident monitoring is an important tool for quality improvement and the maintenance of high safety standards. It was developed for aviation safety and is now widely accepted as a useful tool to reduce medical care-related morbidity and mortality. Despite this widespread acceptance, the literature has no reports on any neurosurgical applications of critical incident monitoring. We describe the introduction of a mono-institutional critical incident reporting system in a neurosurgical department. Furthermore, we have developed a formula to assess possible counterstrategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All staff members of a neurosurgical department were advised to report critical incidents. The anonymous reporting form contained a box for the description of the incident, several multiple-choice questions on specific risk factors, place and reason for occurrence of the incident, severity of the consequences and suggested counterstrategies. The incident data was entered into an online documentation system (ADKA DokuPik) and evaluated by an external specialist. For data analysis we applied a modified assessment scheme initially designed for flight safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data collection was started in September 2008. The average number of reported incidents was 18 per month (currently 216 in total). Most incidents occurred on the neurosurgical ward (64%). Human error was involved in 86% of the reported incidents. The largest group of incidents consisted of medication-related problems. Accordingly, counterstrategies were developed, resulting in a decrease in the relative number of reported medication-related incidents from 42% (March 09) to 30% (September 09).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of the critical incident reporting system presented no technical problems. The reporting rate was high compared to that reported in the current literature. The formulation, evaluation and introduction of specific counterstrategies to guard against selected groups of incidents may improve patient safety in neurosurgical departments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51241,"journal":{"name":"Central European Neurosurgery","volume":"72 1","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0029-1243199","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1243199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Background: Critical incident monitoring is an important tool for quality improvement and the maintenance of high safety standards. It was developed for aviation safety and is now widely accepted as a useful tool to reduce medical care-related morbidity and mortality. Despite this widespread acceptance, the literature has no reports on any neurosurgical applications of critical incident monitoring. We describe the introduction of a mono-institutional critical incident reporting system in a neurosurgical department. Furthermore, we have developed a formula to assess possible counterstrategies.

Methods: All staff members of a neurosurgical department were advised to report critical incidents. The anonymous reporting form contained a box for the description of the incident, several multiple-choice questions on specific risk factors, place and reason for occurrence of the incident, severity of the consequences and suggested counterstrategies. The incident data was entered into an online documentation system (ADKA DokuPik) and evaluated by an external specialist. For data analysis we applied a modified assessment scheme initially designed for flight safety.

Results: Data collection was started in September 2008. The average number of reported incidents was 18 per month (currently 216 in total). Most incidents occurred on the neurosurgical ward (64%). Human error was involved in 86% of the reported incidents. The largest group of incidents consisted of medication-related problems. Accordingly, counterstrategies were developed, resulting in a decrease in the relative number of reported medication-related incidents from 42% (March 09) to 30% (September 09).

Conclusions: Implementation of the critical incident reporting system presented no technical problems. The reporting rate was high compared to that reported in the current literature. The formulation, evaluation and introduction of specific counterstrategies to guard against selected groups of incidents may improve patient safety in neurosurgical departments.

神经外科危重事件报告系统的实施。
背景:关键事件监测是提高质量和维持高安全标准的重要工具。它是为了航空安全而开发的,现在已被广泛接受为减少与医疗有关的发病率和死亡率的有用工具。尽管这被广泛接受,但文献中没有任何关于关键事件监测的神经外科应用的报道。我们描述了在神经外科引入单一机构的关键事件报告系统。此外,我们还制定了一个公式来评估可能的对策。方法:建议所有神经外科工作人员报告危重事件。匿名报告表包括一栏,内容包括事件描述、若干多项选择题,内容涉及具体风险因素、事件发生的地点和原因、后果的严重程度以及建议的应对策略。事件数据被输入在线文档系统(ADKA DokuPik),并由外部专家进行评估。对于数据分析,我们采用了最初为飞行安全设计的改进评估方案。结果:2008年9月开始数据收集。报告的事件平均每月18起(目前总共216起)。大多数事故发生在神经外科病房(64%)。86%的报告事故涉及人为失误。最大的一组事件是与药物有关的问题。因此,制定了对策,导致报告的药物相关事件的相对数量从42%(2009年3月)减少到30%(2009年9月)。结论:关键事件报告系统的实施没有出现技术问题。与现有文献报道相比,报告率较高。制定、评估和引入特定的对策来防范特定的事件群,可以提高神经外科的患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Neurosurgery
Central European Neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信