Free abdominal fluid without obvious solid organ injury upon CT imaging: an actual problem or simply over-diagnosing?

Vanessa M Banz, Muhammad U Butt, Heinz Zimmermann, Victor Jeger, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos
{"title":"Free abdominal fluid without obvious solid organ injury upon CT imaging: an actual problem or simply over-diagnosing?","authors":"Vanessa M Banz,&nbsp;Muhammad U Butt,&nbsp;Heinz Zimmermann,&nbsp;Victor Jeger,&nbsp;Aristomenis K Exadaktylos","doi":"10.1186/1752-2897-3-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whereas a non-operative approach for hemodynamically stable patients with free intraabdominal fluid in the presence of solid organ injury is generally accepted, the presence of free fluid in the abdomen without evidence of solid organ injury not only presents a challenge for the treating emergency physician but also for the surgeon in charge. Despite recent advances in imaging modalities, with multi-detector computed tomography (CT) (with or without contrast agent) usually the imaging method of choice, diagnosis and interpretation of the results remains difficult. While some studies conclude that CT is highly accurate and relatively specific at diagnosing mesenteric and hollow viscus injury, others studies deem CT to be unreliable. These differences may in part be due to the experience and the interpretation of the radiologist and/or the treating physician or surgeon.A search of the literature has made it apparent that there is no straightforward answer to the question what to do with patients with free intraabdominal fluid on CT scanning but without signs of solid organ injury. In hemodynamically unstable patients, free intraabdominal fluid in the absence of solid organ injury usually mandates immediate surgical intervention. For patients with blunt abdominal trauma and more than just a trace of free intraabdominal fluid or for patients with signs of peritonitis, the threshold for a surgical exploration - preferably by a laparoscopic approach - should be low. Based on the available information, we aim to provide the reader with an overview of the current literature with specific emphasis on diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to this problem and suggest a possible algorithm, which might help with the adequate treatment of such patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":87652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","volume":"3 ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1752-2897-3-10","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-3-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Whereas a non-operative approach for hemodynamically stable patients with free intraabdominal fluid in the presence of solid organ injury is generally accepted, the presence of free fluid in the abdomen without evidence of solid organ injury not only presents a challenge for the treating emergency physician but also for the surgeon in charge. Despite recent advances in imaging modalities, with multi-detector computed tomography (CT) (with or without contrast agent) usually the imaging method of choice, diagnosis and interpretation of the results remains difficult. While some studies conclude that CT is highly accurate and relatively specific at diagnosing mesenteric and hollow viscus injury, others studies deem CT to be unreliable. These differences may in part be due to the experience and the interpretation of the radiologist and/or the treating physician or surgeon.A search of the literature has made it apparent that there is no straightforward answer to the question what to do with patients with free intraabdominal fluid on CT scanning but without signs of solid organ injury. In hemodynamically unstable patients, free intraabdominal fluid in the absence of solid organ injury usually mandates immediate surgical intervention. For patients with blunt abdominal trauma and more than just a trace of free intraabdominal fluid or for patients with signs of peritonitis, the threshold for a surgical exploration - preferably by a laparoscopic approach - should be low. Based on the available information, we aim to provide the reader with an overview of the current literature with specific emphasis on diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to this problem and suggest a possible algorithm, which might help with the adequate treatment of such patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腹腔积液CT无明显实性脏器损伤:是实际问题还是过度诊断?
尽管对于血流动力学稳定且存在实体器官损伤的游离腹内液体的患者,一般接受非手术方法,但腹部存在无实体器官损伤证据的游离液体不仅对急诊医生提出了挑战,而且对负责的外科医生也提出了挑战。尽管最近在成像方式方面取得了进展,但多探测器计算机断层扫描(CT)(带或不带造影剂)通常选择的成像方法,诊断和解释结果仍然困难。虽然一些研究认为CT在诊断肠系膜和空心内脏损伤方面具有很高的准确性和相对特异性,但也有研究认为CT不可靠。这些差异可能部分是由于放射科医生和/或治疗内科医生或外科医生的经验和解释。对文献的搜索表明,对于CT扫描显示腹腔内积液但没有实体器官损伤迹象的患者该如何处理,显然没有直截了当的答案。在血流动力学不稳定的患者中,在没有实体器官损伤的情况下,腹腔内游离积液通常需要立即手术干预。对于有钝性腹部创伤的患者,而且不止是有少量腹内积液或有腹膜炎迹象的患者,手术探查的门槛应该较低——最好是通过腹腔镜方法。基于现有的信息,我们旨在为读者提供当前文献的概述,特别强调对这一问题的诊断和治疗方法,并提出一种可能的算法,这可能有助于对这类患者进行适当的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书