Is one eye better than two in strabismus? Or does the misaligned amblyopic eye interfere with binocular vision? A preliminary functional MRI study.

Felisa Shokida, Martin Eleta, Mariano Sidelnik, Jose Gabriel
{"title":"Is one eye better than two in strabismus? Or does the misaligned amblyopic eye interfere with binocular vision? A preliminary functional MRI study.","authors":"Felisa Shokida,&nbsp;Martin Eleta,&nbsp;Mariano Sidelnik,&nbsp;Jose Gabriel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine if patients with strabismic amblyopia could have increased occipital visual cortex activation with monocular stimulation of the sound fixing eye, rather than with simultaneous stimulation of both eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was performed including 12 patients with strabismus and amblyopia, who were evaluated using functional MRI with visual stimulation paradigms. The measurements were made in the occipital visual cortex, assessing the response to the binocular and monocular stimulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 out of 12 patients showed an increased cortical response of the healthy eye in comparison to the amblyopic one. Nine of the 12 patients showed larger cortical activation with visual stimulation of the healthy eye compared to the binocular condition analysis. Three out of the 12 cases had a greater activation area when the stimulation was binocular rather than monocular, 2 of whom had a relatively small angle of strabismus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with amblyopia and strabismus could see better with only one eye instead of both eyes. This could be related to inhibition of the binocular function of the brain by the misaligned amblyopic eye.</p>","PeriodicalId":79564,"journal":{"name":"Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly","volume":"24 4","pages":"222-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine if patients with strabismic amblyopia could have increased occipital visual cortex activation with monocular stimulation of the sound fixing eye, rather than with simultaneous stimulation of both eyes.

Methods: A prospective study was performed including 12 patients with strabismus and amblyopia, who were evaluated using functional MRI with visual stimulation paradigms. The measurements were made in the occipital visual cortex, assessing the response to the binocular and monocular stimulation.

Results: 12 out of 12 patients showed an increased cortical response of the healthy eye in comparison to the amblyopic one. Nine of the 12 patients showed larger cortical activation with visual stimulation of the healthy eye compared to the binocular condition analysis. Three out of the 12 cases had a greater activation area when the stimulation was binocular rather than monocular, 2 of whom had a relatively small angle of strabismus.

Conclusions: Patients with amblyopia and strabismus could see better with only one eye instead of both eyes. This could be related to inhibition of the binocular function of the brain by the misaligned amblyopic eye.

斜视一只眼睛比两只眼睛好吗?或者是错位的弱视干扰了双眼视觉?初步功能性MRI研究。
目的:本研究的目的是确定斜视弱视患者是否可以通过单眼刺激固定音眼而不是同时刺激双眼来增加枕部视觉皮层的激活。方法:对12例斜视和弱视患者进行前瞻性研究,采用视觉刺激模式的功能MRI对其进行评估。在枕部视觉皮层进行测量,评估对双眼和单眼刺激的反应。结果:12例患者中有12例显示健康眼的皮质反应比弱视眼增加。12名患者中有9名在健康眼睛的视觉刺激下表现出比双眼状况分析更大的皮质激活。12例患者中有3例双眼刺激比单眼刺激激活区大,其中2例斜视角度较小。结论:弱视、斜视患者单眼视力优于双眼视力。这可能与不对准的弱视眼对大脑双眼功能的抑制有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信