Measurement and modeling of exposure to selected air toxics for health effects studies and verification by biomarkers.

Roy M Harrison, Juana Maria Delgado-Saborit, Stephen J Baker, Noel Aquilina, Claire Meddings, Stuart Harrad, Ian Matthews, Sotiris Vardoulakis, H Ross Anderson
{"title":"Measurement and modeling of exposure to selected air toxics for health effects studies and verification by biomarkers.","authors":"Roy M Harrison, Juana Maria Delgado-Saborit, Stephen J Baker, Noel Aquilina, Claire Meddings, Stuart Harrad, Ian Matthews, Sotiris Vardoulakis, H Ross Anderson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The overall aim of our investigation was to quantify the magnitude and range of individual personal exposures to a variety of air toxics and to develop models for exposure prediction on the basis of time-activity diaries. The specific research goals were (1) to use personal monitoring of non-smokers at a range of residential locations and exposures to non-traffic sources to assess daily exposures to a range of air toxics, especially volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including 1,3-butadiene and particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); (2) to determine microenvironmental concentrations of the same air toxics, taking account of spatial and temporal variations and hot spots; (3) to optimize a model of personal exposure using microenvironmental concentration data and time-activity diaries and to compare modeled exposures with exposures independently estimated from personal monitoring data; (4) to determine the relationships of urinary biomarkers with the environmental exposures to the corresponding air toxic. Personal exposure measurements were made using an actively pumped personal sampler enclosed in a briefcase. Five 24-hour integrated personal samples were collected from 100 volunteers with a range of exposure patterns for analysis of VOCs and 1,3-butadiene concentrations of ambient air. One 24-hour integrated PAH personal exposure sample was collected by each subject concurrently with 24 hours of the personal sampling for VOCs. During the period when personal exposures were being measured, workplace and home concentrations of the same air toxics were being measured simultaneously, as were seasonal levels in other microenvironments that the subjects visit during their daily activities, including street microenvironments, transport microenvironments, indoor environments, and other home environments. Information about subjects' lifestyles and daily activities were recorded by means of questionnaires and activity diaries. VOCs were collected in tubes packed with the adsorbent resins Tenax GR and Carbotrap, and separate tubes for the collection of 1,3-butadiene were packed with Carbopack B and Carbosieve S-III. After sampling, the tubes were analyzed by means of a thermal desorber interfaced with a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC-MS). Particle-phase PAHs collected onto a quartz-fiber filter were extracted with solvent, purified, and concentrated before being analyzed with a GC-MS. Urinary biomarkers were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). Both the environmental concentrations and personal exposure concentrations measured in this study are lower than those in the majority of earlier published work, which is consistent with the reported application of abatement measures to the control of air toxics emissions. The environmental concentration data clearly demonstrate the influence of traffic sources and meteorologic conditions leading to higher air toxics concentrations in the winter and during peak-traffic hours. The seasonal effect was also observed in indoor environments, where indoor sources add to the effects of the previously identified outdoor sources. The variability of personal exposure concentrations of VOCs and PAHs mainly reflects the range of activities the subjects engaged in during the five-day period of sampling. A number of generic factors have been identified to influence personal exposure concentrations to VOCs, such as the presence of an integral garage (attached to the home), exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), use of solvents, and commuting. In the case of the medium- and high-molecular-weight PAHs, traffic and ETS are important contributions to personal exposure. Personal exposure concentrations generally exceed home indoor concentrations, which in turn exceed outdoor concentrations. The home microenvironment is the dominant individual contributor to personal exposure. However, for those subjects with particularly high personal exposures, activities within the home and exposure to ETS play a major role in determining exposure. Correlation analysis and principal components analysis (PCA) have been performed to identify groups of compounds that share common sources, common chemistry, or common transport or meteorologic patterns. We used these methods to identify four main factors determining the makeup of personal exposures: fossil fuel combustion, use of solvents, ETS exposure, and use of consumer products. Concurrent with sampling of the selected air toxics, a total of 500 urine samples were collected, one for each of the 100 subjects on the day after each of the five days on which the briefcases were carried for personal exposure data collection. From the 500 samples, 100 were selected to be analyzed for PAHs and ETS-related urinary biomarkers. Results showed that urinary biomarkers of ETS exposure correlated strongly with the gas-phase markers of ETS and 1,3-butadiene. The urinary ETS biomarkers also correlated strongly with high-molecular-weight PAHs in the personal exposure samples. Five different approaches have been taken to model personal exposure to VOCs and PAHs, using 75% of the measured personal exposure data set to develop the models and 25% as an independent check on the model performance. The best personal exposure model, based on measured microenvironmental concentrations and lifestyle factors, is able to account for about 50% of the variance in measured personal exposure to benzene and a higher proportion of the variance for some other compounds (e.g., 75% of the variance in 3-ethenylpyridine exposure). In the case of the PAHs, the best model for benzo[a]pyrene is able to account for about 35% of the variance among exposures, with a similar result for the rest of the PAH compounds. The models developed were validated by the independent data set for almost all the VOC compounds. The models developed for PAHs explain some of the variance in the independent data set and are good indicators of the sources affecting PAH concentrations but could not be validated statistically, with the exception of the model for pyrene. A proposal for categorizing personal exposures as low or high is also presented, according to exposure thresholds. For both VOCs and PAHs, low exposures are correctly classified for the concentrations predicted by the proposed models, but higher exposures were less successfully classified.</p>","PeriodicalId":74687,"journal":{"name":"Research report (Health Effects Institute)","volume":" 143","pages":"3-96; discussion 97-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research report (Health Effects Institute)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overall aim of our investigation was to quantify the magnitude and range of individual personal exposures to a variety of air toxics and to develop models for exposure prediction on the basis of time-activity diaries. The specific research goals were (1) to use personal monitoring of non-smokers at a range of residential locations and exposures to non-traffic sources to assess daily exposures to a range of air toxics, especially volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including 1,3-butadiene and particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); (2) to determine microenvironmental concentrations of the same air toxics, taking account of spatial and temporal variations and hot spots; (3) to optimize a model of personal exposure using microenvironmental concentration data and time-activity diaries and to compare modeled exposures with exposures independently estimated from personal monitoring data; (4) to determine the relationships of urinary biomarkers with the environmental exposures to the corresponding air toxic. Personal exposure measurements were made using an actively pumped personal sampler enclosed in a briefcase. Five 24-hour integrated personal samples were collected from 100 volunteers with a range of exposure patterns for analysis of VOCs and 1,3-butadiene concentrations of ambient air. One 24-hour integrated PAH personal exposure sample was collected by each subject concurrently with 24 hours of the personal sampling for VOCs. During the period when personal exposures were being measured, workplace and home concentrations of the same air toxics were being measured simultaneously, as were seasonal levels in other microenvironments that the subjects visit during their daily activities, including street microenvironments, transport microenvironments, indoor environments, and other home environments. Information about subjects' lifestyles and daily activities were recorded by means of questionnaires and activity diaries. VOCs were collected in tubes packed with the adsorbent resins Tenax GR and Carbotrap, and separate tubes for the collection of 1,3-butadiene were packed with Carbopack B and Carbosieve S-III. After sampling, the tubes were analyzed by means of a thermal desorber interfaced with a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC-MS). Particle-phase PAHs collected onto a quartz-fiber filter were extracted with solvent, purified, and concentrated before being analyzed with a GC-MS. Urinary biomarkers were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). Both the environmental concentrations and personal exposure concentrations measured in this study are lower than those in the majority of earlier published work, which is consistent with the reported application of abatement measures to the control of air toxics emissions. The environmental concentration data clearly demonstrate the influence of traffic sources and meteorologic conditions leading to higher air toxics concentrations in the winter and during peak-traffic hours. The seasonal effect was also observed in indoor environments, where indoor sources add to the effects of the previously identified outdoor sources. The variability of personal exposure concentrations of VOCs and PAHs mainly reflects the range of activities the subjects engaged in during the five-day period of sampling. A number of generic factors have been identified to influence personal exposure concentrations to VOCs, such as the presence of an integral garage (attached to the home), exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), use of solvents, and commuting. In the case of the medium- and high-molecular-weight PAHs, traffic and ETS are important contributions to personal exposure. Personal exposure concentrations generally exceed home indoor concentrations, which in turn exceed outdoor concentrations. The home microenvironment is the dominant individual contributor to personal exposure. However, for those subjects with particularly high personal exposures, activities within the home and exposure to ETS play a major role in determining exposure. Correlation analysis and principal components analysis (PCA) have been performed to identify groups of compounds that share common sources, common chemistry, or common transport or meteorologic patterns. We used these methods to identify four main factors determining the makeup of personal exposures: fossil fuel combustion, use of solvents, ETS exposure, and use of consumer products. Concurrent with sampling of the selected air toxics, a total of 500 urine samples were collected, one for each of the 100 subjects on the day after each of the five days on which the briefcases were carried for personal exposure data collection. From the 500 samples, 100 were selected to be analyzed for PAHs and ETS-related urinary biomarkers. Results showed that urinary biomarkers of ETS exposure correlated strongly with the gas-phase markers of ETS and 1,3-butadiene. The urinary ETS biomarkers also correlated strongly with high-molecular-weight PAHs in the personal exposure samples. Five different approaches have been taken to model personal exposure to VOCs and PAHs, using 75% of the measured personal exposure data set to develop the models and 25% as an independent check on the model performance. The best personal exposure model, based on measured microenvironmental concentrations and lifestyle factors, is able to account for about 50% of the variance in measured personal exposure to benzene and a higher proportion of the variance for some other compounds (e.g., 75% of the variance in 3-ethenylpyridine exposure). In the case of the PAHs, the best model for benzo[a]pyrene is able to account for about 35% of the variance among exposures, with a similar result for the rest of the PAH compounds. The models developed were validated by the independent data set for almost all the VOC compounds. The models developed for PAHs explain some of the variance in the independent data set and are good indicators of the sources affecting PAH concentrations but could not be validated statistically, with the exception of the model for pyrene. A proposal for categorizing personal exposures as low or high is also presented, according to exposure thresholds. For both VOCs and PAHs, low exposures are correctly classified for the concentrations predicted by the proposed models, but higher exposures were less successfully classified.

测量和模拟暴露于选定空气毒物的健康影响研究和生物标志物验证。
我们调查的总体目的是量化个人暴露于各种空气毒物的程度和范围,并建立基于时间活动日记的暴露预测模型。具体的研究目标是:(1)对一系列居住地点和非交通源的非吸烟者进行个人监测,以评估日常暴露于一系列空气毒物,特别是挥发性有机化合物(VOCs),包括1,3-丁二烯和颗粒物多环芳烃(PAHs);(2)确定同一空气毒物的微环境浓度,同时考虑时空变化和热点;(3)利用微环境浓度数据和时间活动日记优化个人暴露模型,并将模型暴露与从个人监测数据独立估计的暴露进行比较;(4)确定尿液生物标志物与相应空气毒性环境暴露的关系。个人暴露量测量是用一个装在公文包里的主动抽吸个人采样器进行的。从100名志愿者中收集了5个24小时综合个人样本,这些样本具有一系列暴露模式,用于分析环境空气中的挥发性有机化合物和1,3-丁二烯浓度。每个受试者采集24小时多环芳烃综合个人暴露样本,同时采集24小时VOCs个人暴露样本。在测量个人暴露期间,同时测量了工作场所和家庭中相同空气毒物的浓度,以及受试者在日常活动中访问的其他微环境中的季节性水平,包括街道微环境、交通微环境、室内环境和其他家庭环境。通过问卷调查和活动日记记录受试者的生活方式和日常活动情况。VOCs收集管分别用吸附树脂Tenax GR和Carbotrap填充,1,3-丁二烯收集管分别用Carbopack B和Carbosieve S-III填充。取样后,用热解吸器和气相色谱-质谱联用仪(GC-MS)分析。收集到石英纤维过滤器上的颗粒相多环芳烃,用溶剂提取,纯化,浓缩,然后用GC-MS分析。采用液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS-MS)分析尿液生物标志物。本研究中测量的环境浓度和个人暴露浓度都低于大多数早期发表的工作,这与报道的采用减排措施控制空气有毒物质排放的情况一致。环境浓度数据清楚地表明,交通来源和气象条件的影响导致冬季和高峰交通时段空气毒物浓度较高。在室内环境中也观察到季节性影响,其中室内源增加了先前确定的室外源的影响。挥发性有机化合物和多环芳烃个人暴露浓度的变异性主要反映了受试者在5天采样期内的活动范围。已经确定了一些影响个人接触挥发性有机化合物浓度的一般因素,例如存在一个完整的车库(与家庭相连),接触环境烟草烟雾(ETS),使用溶剂和通勤。在中等和高分子量多环芳烃的情况下,交通和排放排放是个人暴露的重要贡献。个人接触浓度通常超过家庭室内浓度,而家庭室内浓度又超过室外浓度。家庭微环境是个人暴露的主要个体贡献者。然而,对于那些个人暴露程度特别高的受试者,家庭活动和暴露于ETS在决定暴露程度方面发挥了主要作用。相关分析和主成分分析(PCA)已被用于识别具有共同来源、共同化学性质或共同运输或气象模式的化合物组。我们使用这些方法确定了决定个人暴露构成的四个主要因素:化石燃料燃烧、溶剂的使用、ETS暴露和消费产品的使用。在对选定的空气毒物取样的同时,共收集了500份尿液样本,在携带公文包以收集个人暴露数据的五天中的每一天的第二天,为100名受试者每人收集了一份尿液样本。从500个样本中,选择100个样本进行多环芳烃和ets相关尿液生物标志物的分析。结果表明,ETS暴露的尿液生物标志物与ETS和1,3-丁二烯的气相标志物密切相关。 尿液ETS生物标志物也与个人暴露样本中的高分子量多环芳烃密切相关。采用了五种不同的方法来模拟个人对挥发性有机化合物和多环芳烃的暴露,使用75%的测量个人暴露数据集来开发模型,25%作为对模型性能的独立检查。基于测量到的微环境浓度和生活方式因素的最佳个人暴露模型能够解释所测量到的个人暴露于苯的差异的约50%,而其他一些化合物的差异比例更高(例如,3-乙基吡啶暴露的差异的75%)。就多环芳烃而言,苯并[a]芘的最佳模型能够解释约35%的暴露差异,对其余多环芳烃化合物也有类似的结果。建立的模型得到了几乎所有VOC化合物的独立数据集的验证。为多环芳烃开发的模型解释了独立数据集中的一些差异,是影响多环芳烃浓度的来源的良好指标,但无法在统计上得到验证,芘的模型除外。还提出了根据暴露阈值将个人暴露程度分为低暴露程度和高暴露程度的建议。对于挥发性有机化合物和多环芳烃,根据所提出的模型预测的浓度,对低暴露量进行了正确的分类,而对高暴露量进行了不太成功的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信