Postmarketing cohort study to assess the safety profile of oral dexketoprofen trometamol for mild to moderate acute pain treatment in primary care.

Xavier Carne, Jose Rios, Ferran Torres
{"title":"Postmarketing cohort study to assess the safety profile of oral dexketoprofen trometamol for mild to moderate acute pain treatment in primary care.","authors":"Xavier Carne,&nbsp;Jose Rios,&nbsp;Ferran Torres","doi":"10.1358/mf.2009.31.8.1419070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, new concerns on the safety profile of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been raised by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and other regulatory authorities. The safety profile of oral dexketoprofen trometamol for the treatment of acute mild to moderate pain of different causes in actual conditions of use in the primary care setting was assessed. A prospective cohort study was designed to evaluate the tolerability of dexketoprofen compared with other commonly prescribed analgesics. Medications were given according to specifications in the summary of product characteristics. The intensity of pain was assessed at baseline and at days 1 and 7 of drug treatment using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. A total of 7,337 patients (median age [IQR] = 46 [33-61] years) were included in the study comparing dexketoprofen (n = 5,429), diclofenac (n = 485), ibuprofen (n = 479), paracetamol (n = 459), metamizole (n = 207), aceclofenac (n = 103), naproxen (n = 74), piroxicam (n = 69) and dexibuprofen (n = 32). The reasons for use were: musculoskeletal disorders, headache, dysmenorrhea and odontalgia. Treatment compliance was very high. Metamizole-paracetamol and dexketoprofen showed the lowest prevalence of AEs (2.7% and 3.6%, respectively), while aceclofenac-diclofenac showed the highest prevalence (8.2%) (P < 0.0001). AEs most frequently observed during NSAID treatment were those related to the gastrointestinal tract (3.5% of subjects, 84% of all AEs), followed by AEs related to the nervous system (0.4%) and skin (0.1%). Most of the reported AEs (91.3%) were of mild to moderate intensity (303 of 332) and only 3.3% of them were considered severe (11 of 332). Risks for gastrointestinal AEs were adjusted for age, gender, history of previous NSAID intake, gastroprotective drugs and reason for prescription. Taking metamizole-paracetamol as the reference group, the odds ratios (OR, 95%) were: 1.30 (0.77-2.19) for dexketoprofen, 1.57 (0.79-3.13) for ibuprofen and dexibuprofen, 2.31 (0.64-8.27) for naproxen, 2.63 (0.85-8.15) for piroxicam and 3.37 (1.87-6.06) for aceclofenac-diclofenac. These results confirm the safety of oral treatment with dexketoprofen in patients with acute pain of various etiologies observed in previous studies and support the use of dexketoprofen as a first-line drug for the approved therapeutic indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":18443,"journal":{"name":"Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1358/mf.2009.31.8.1419070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Recently, new concerns on the safety profile of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been raised by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and other regulatory authorities. The safety profile of oral dexketoprofen trometamol for the treatment of acute mild to moderate pain of different causes in actual conditions of use in the primary care setting was assessed. A prospective cohort study was designed to evaluate the tolerability of dexketoprofen compared with other commonly prescribed analgesics. Medications were given according to specifications in the summary of product characteristics. The intensity of pain was assessed at baseline and at days 1 and 7 of drug treatment using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. A total of 7,337 patients (median age [IQR] = 46 [33-61] years) were included in the study comparing dexketoprofen (n = 5,429), diclofenac (n = 485), ibuprofen (n = 479), paracetamol (n = 459), metamizole (n = 207), aceclofenac (n = 103), naproxen (n = 74), piroxicam (n = 69) and dexibuprofen (n = 32). The reasons for use were: musculoskeletal disorders, headache, dysmenorrhea and odontalgia. Treatment compliance was very high. Metamizole-paracetamol and dexketoprofen showed the lowest prevalence of AEs (2.7% and 3.6%, respectively), while aceclofenac-diclofenac showed the highest prevalence (8.2%) (P < 0.0001). AEs most frequently observed during NSAID treatment were those related to the gastrointestinal tract (3.5% of subjects, 84% of all AEs), followed by AEs related to the nervous system (0.4%) and skin (0.1%). Most of the reported AEs (91.3%) were of mild to moderate intensity (303 of 332) and only 3.3% of them were considered severe (11 of 332). Risks for gastrointestinal AEs were adjusted for age, gender, history of previous NSAID intake, gastroprotective drugs and reason for prescription. Taking metamizole-paracetamol as the reference group, the odds ratios (OR, 95%) were: 1.30 (0.77-2.19) for dexketoprofen, 1.57 (0.79-3.13) for ibuprofen and dexibuprofen, 2.31 (0.64-8.27) for naproxen, 2.63 (0.85-8.15) for piroxicam and 3.37 (1.87-6.06) for aceclofenac-diclofenac. These results confirm the safety of oral treatment with dexketoprofen in patients with acute pain of various etiologies observed in previous studies and support the use of dexketoprofen as a first-line drug for the approved therapeutic indications.

上市后队列研究评估口服dexketoprofen trometamol用于初级保健中轻中度急性疼痛治疗的安全性。
最近,欧洲药品管理局(EMEA)和其他监管机构对非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的安全性提出了新的担忧。评估了口服右酮洛芬曲美他醇在基层医疗机构实际使用条件下治疗不同原因的急性轻中度疼痛的安全性。一项前瞻性队列研究旨在评估右酮洛芬与其他常用镇痛药的耐受性。根据产品特性摘要中的规格给予药物。在基线和药物治疗第1天和第7天使用100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度。记录不良事件(ae)。研究共纳入7337例患者(中位年龄[IQR] = 46[33-61]岁),比较右酮洛芬(n = 5429)、双氯芬酸(n = 485)、布洛芬(n = 479)、扑热息痛(n = 459)、metamizole (n = 207)、aceclofenac (n = 103)、萘普生(n = 74)、吡罗昔康(n = 69)和德西布洛芬(n = 32)。使用的原因是:肌肉骨骼疾病,头痛,痛经和牙痛。治疗依从性非常高。氨苄唑-扑热息痛和右酮洛芬的ae发生率最低(分别为2.7%和3.6%),而乙酰氯芬酸-双氯芬酸的ae发生率最高(8.2%)(P < 0.0001)。在非甾体抗炎药治疗期间最常见的不良反应是胃肠道相关的不良反应(占受试者的3.5%,占所有不良反应的84%),其次是神经系统相关的不良反应(0.4%)和皮肤相关的不良反应(0.1%)。大多数报告的ae(91.3%)为轻至中等强度(332例中有303例),仅3.3%的ae被认为是严重的(332例中有11例)。胃肠不良事件的风险根据年龄、性别、既往非甾体抗炎药摄入史、胃保护药物和处方原因进行调整。以metamizol -paracetamol为参照组,比值比(OR, 95%)分别为:右酮洛芬1.30(0.77 ~ 2.19)、布洛芬与地西布洛芬1.57(0.79 ~ 3.13)、萘普生2.31(0.64 ~ 8.27)、吡罗昔康2.63(0.85 ~ 8.15)、阿氯芬酸-双氯芬酸3.37(1.87 ~ 6.06)。这些结果证实了口服右酮洛芬治疗先前研究中观察到的各种病因急性疼痛患者的安全性,并支持将右酮洛芬作为一线药物用于已批准的治疗适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信