Radiation therapy for early stage (I/II) non-small cell lung cancer.

Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2010-01-01 Epub Date: 2009-11-24 DOI:10.1159/000262464
Branislav Jeremic, Francesc Casas, Luhua Wang, Branislav Perin
{"title":"Radiation therapy for early stage (I/II) non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Branislav Jeremic,&nbsp;Francesc Casas,&nbsp;Luhua Wang,&nbsp;Branislav Perin","doi":"10.1159/000262464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For patients with early (stage I/II) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery is considered as the standard treatment of choice, although recent data on additional chemotherapy (CHT) showed that it may be beneficial in this setting. There is, however, a subset of patients that never undergo surgery. These patients are considered technically operable, but medically inoperable, due to existing comorbidities. In addition, frequently elderly patients with early NSCLC are denied surgery due to expected peri- and/or postoperative complications. Finally, in recent years there has been an increase in the incidence of patients refusing surgery. For all these patients, radiation therapy (RT) was traditionally considered as the standard treatment option. Data accumulated over the last 5 decades showed that RT alone can produce median survival times of up to > 30 months and 5-year survival of up to 30%. When cancer-unrelated deaths were taken into account, cause-specific survival rates were usually higher for some 10-15%. Accumulated experience seems to suggest that doses of at least 65 Gy with standard fractionation or its equivalent when altered fractionation is used are necessary for control of the disease. Smaller tumors seem to have favorable prognosis, while the issue of elective nodal RT continues to be controversial. Patterns of failure have clearly identified local failure as the predominant one. Although a number of potential pretreatment patient- and tumor-related prognostic factors have been examined, none has been shown to clearly influenced survival. Toxicity was usually low.</p>","PeriodicalId":55140,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology","volume":"42 ","pages":"87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000262464","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000262464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

For patients with early (stage I/II) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery is considered as the standard treatment of choice, although recent data on additional chemotherapy (CHT) showed that it may be beneficial in this setting. There is, however, a subset of patients that never undergo surgery. These patients are considered technically operable, but medically inoperable, due to existing comorbidities. In addition, frequently elderly patients with early NSCLC are denied surgery due to expected peri- and/or postoperative complications. Finally, in recent years there has been an increase in the incidence of patients refusing surgery. For all these patients, radiation therapy (RT) was traditionally considered as the standard treatment option. Data accumulated over the last 5 decades showed that RT alone can produce median survival times of up to > 30 months and 5-year survival of up to 30%. When cancer-unrelated deaths were taken into account, cause-specific survival rates were usually higher for some 10-15%. Accumulated experience seems to suggest that doses of at least 65 Gy with standard fractionation or its equivalent when altered fractionation is used are necessary for control of the disease. Smaller tumors seem to have favorable prognosis, while the issue of elective nodal RT continues to be controversial. Patterns of failure have clearly identified local failure as the predominant one. Although a number of potential pretreatment patient- and tumor-related prognostic factors have been examined, none has been shown to clearly influenced survival. Toxicity was usually low.

放射治疗早期(I/II)非小细胞肺癌。
对于早期(I/II期)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,手术被认为是标准的治疗选择,尽管最近关于附加化疗(CHT)的数据显示,在这种情况下,手术可能是有益的。然而,有一小部分患者从未接受过手术。这些患者在技术上是可手术的,但由于存在合并症,在医学上是不可手术的。此外,由于预期的围手术期和/或术后并发症,早期非小细胞肺癌的老年患者经常被拒绝手术。最后,近年来,患者拒绝手术的发生率有所增加。对于所有这些患者,放射治疗(RT)传统上被认为是标准的治疗选择。过去50年积累的数据表明,单独放疗可使中位生存时间长达> 30个月,5年生存率高达30%。如果考虑到与癌症无关的死亡,特定原因的存活率通常会高出10-15%。积累的经验似乎表明,采用标准分馏或采用改变分馏时至少65戈瑞的当量剂量对于控制该疾病是必要的。较小的肿瘤似乎有良好的预后,而选择性淋巴结RT的问题仍然存在争议。失效模式已清楚地确定局部失效为主要失效。虽然已经研究了许多潜在的预处理患者和肿瘤相关的预后因素,但没有一个显示出明显影响生存。毒性通常很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信