Matar Abdullah Alzahrani, Catherine M. Dean, Louise Ada
{"title":"Ability to negotiate stairs predicts free-living physical activity in community-dwelling people with stroke: an observational study","authors":"Matar Abdullah Alzahrani, Catherine M. Dean, Louise Ada","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70008-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Which clinical measures of walking performance best predict free-living physical activity in community-dwelling people with stroke?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional observational study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>42 community-dwelling stroke survivors.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>Predictors were four clinical measures of walking performance (speed, automaticity, capacity, and stairs ability). The outcome of interest was free-living physical activity, measured as frequency (activity counts) and duration (time on feet), collected using an activity monitor called the Intelligent Device for Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Time on feet was predicted by stairs ability alone (B 166, 95% CI 55 to 278) which accounted for 48% of the variance. Activity counts were also predicted by stairs ability alone (B 6486, 95% CI 2922 to 10 050) which accounted for 58% of the variance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The best predictor of free-living physical activity in community-dwelling people with stroke was stairs ability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"55 4","pages":"Pages 277-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70008-X","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000495140970008X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71
Abstract
Question
Which clinical measures of walking performance best predict free-living physical activity in community-dwelling people with stroke?
Design
Cross-sectional observational study.
Participants
42 community-dwelling stroke survivors.
Outcome measures
Predictors were four clinical measures of walking performance (speed, automaticity, capacity, and stairs ability). The outcome of interest was free-living physical activity, measured as frequency (activity counts) and duration (time on feet), collected using an activity monitor called the Intelligent Device for Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity.
Results
Time on feet was predicted by stairs ability alone (B 166, 95% CI 55 to 278) which accounted for 48% of the variance. Activity counts were also predicted by stairs ability alone (B 6486, 95% CI 2922 to 10 050) which accounted for 58% of the variance.
Conclusion
The best predictor of free-living physical activity in community-dwelling people with stroke was stairs ability.
哪一种步行表现的临床指标能最好地预测住在社区的中风患者的自由生活体力活动?设计横断面观察性研究。参与者为42名居住在社区的中风幸存者。预后指标为四项临床步行表现指标(速度、自动性、行走能力和爬楼梯能力)。结果是自由生活的体力活动,测量频率(活动次数)和持续时间(步行时间),使用称为能量消耗和体力活动智能设备的活动监视器收集。结果:步行时间仅由爬楼梯能力预测(b166, 95% CI 55 ~ 278),占方差的48%。活动计数也仅由楼梯能力预测(b6486, 95% CI 2922至10050),占方差的58%。结论社区居住卒中患者自由生活体力活动的最佳预测指标是爬楼梯能力。