Ability to negotiate stairs predicts free-living physical activity in community-dwelling people with stroke: an observational study

Matar Abdullah Alzahrani, Catherine M. Dean, Louise Ada
{"title":"Ability to negotiate stairs predicts free-living physical activity in community-dwelling people with stroke: an observational study","authors":"Matar Abdullah Alzahrani,&nbsp;Catherine M. Dean,&nbsp;Louise Ada","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70008-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Which clinical measures of walking performance best predict free-living physical activity in community-dwelling people with stroke?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional observational study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>42 community-dwelling stroke survivors.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>Predictors were four clinical measures of walking performance (speed, automaticity, capacity, and stairs ability). The outcome of interest was free-living physical activity, measured as frequency (activity counts) and duration (time on feet), collected using an activity monitor called the Intelligent Device for Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Time on feet was predicted by stairs ability alone (B 166, 95% CI 55 to 278) which accounted for 48% of the variance. Activity counts were also predicted by stairs ability alone (B 6486, 95% CI 2922 to 10 050) which accounted for 58% of the variance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The best predictor of free-living physical activity in community-dwelling people with stroke was stairs ability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"55 4","pages":"Pages 277-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70008-X","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000495140970008X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

Question

Which clinical measures of walking performance best predict free-living physical activity in community-dwelling people with stroke?

Design

Cross-sectional observational study.

Participants

42 community-dwelling stroke survivors.

Outcome measures

Predictors were four clinical measures of walking performance (speed, automaticity, capacity, and stairs ability). The outcome of interest was free-living physical activity, measured as frequency (activity counts) and duration (time on feet), collected using an activity monitor called the Intelligent Device for Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity.

Results

Time on feet was predicted by stairs ability alone (B 166, 95% CI 55 to 278) which accounted for 48% of the variance. Activity counts were also predicted by stairs ability alone (B 6486, 95% CI 2922 to 10 050) which accounted for 58% of the variance.

Conclusion

The best predictor of free-living physical activity in community-dwelling people with stroke was stairs ability.

行走楼梯的能力预测社区居住的中风患者的自由生活体力活动:一项观察性研究
哪一种步行表现的临床指标能最好地预测住在社区的中风患者的自由生活体力活动?设计横断面观察性研究。参与者为42名居住在社区的中风幸存者。预后指标为四项临床步行表现指标(速度、自动性、行走能力和爬楼梯能力)。结果是自由生活的体力活动,测量频率(活动次数)和持续时间(步行时间),使用称为能量消耗和体力活动智能设备的活动监视器收集。结果:步行时间仅由爬楼梯能力预测(b166, 95% CI 55 ~ 278),占方差的48%。活动计数也仅由楼梯能力预测(b6486, 95% CI 2922至10050),占方差的58%。结论社区居住卒中患者自由生活体力活动的最佳预测指标是爬楼梯能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信