Hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation improves secretion clearance and respiratory mechanics in ventilated patients with pulmonary infection: a randomised crossover trial

Daniela Aires Lemes, Walter Araújo Zin, Fernando Silva Guimarães
{"title":"Hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation improves secretion clearance and respiratory mechanics in ventilated patients with pulmonary infection: a randomised crossover trial","authors":"Daniela Aires Lemes,&nbsp;Walter Araújo Zin,&nbsp;Fernando Silva Guimarães","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70004-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Is ventilator-induced hyperinflation in sidelying more effective than sidelying alone in removing secretions and improving respiratory mechanics in ventilated patients with pulmonary infection?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised crossover trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>30 mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection in an adult intensive care unit.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The experimental intervention was 30 minutes of ventilator-induced hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation in sidelying; the control intervention was 30 minutes of sidelying. Participants received both interventions on the same day, with a five-hour washout period between them.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>Secretion clearance was measured as sputum volume retrieved during the intervention. Respiratory mechanics were measured as static compliance and total resistance of the respiratory system before and after the intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The experimental intervention cleared 1.3 ml (95% CI 0.5 to 2.2) more secretions than the control. After ventilator-induced hyperinflation in sidelying, respiratory compliance had increased 4.7 ml/cmH<sub>2</sub>O (95% CI 2.6 to 6.8) more than in sidelying alone. There was no difference in total resistance of the respiratory system between the interventions (mean difference 0.3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O/l/s, 95% CI –0.8 to 1.3).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The application of hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection improves secretion clearance and increases static compliance of the respiratory system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"55 4","pages":"Pages 249-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70004-2","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

Question

Is ventilator-induced hyperinflation in sidelying more effective than sidelying alone in removing secretions and improving respiratory mechanics in ventilated patients with pulmonary infection?

Design

Randomised crossover trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis.

Participants

30 mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection in an adult intensive care unit.

Intervention

The experimental intervention was 30 minutes of ventilator-induced hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation in sidelying; the control intervention was 30 minutes of sidelying. Participants received both interventions on the same day, with a five-hour washout period between them.

Outcome measures

Secretion clearance was measured as sputum volume retrieved during the intervention. Respiratory mechanics were measured as static compliance and total resistance of the respiratory system before and after the intervention.

Results

The experimental intervention cleared 1.3 ml (95% CI 0.5 to 2.2) more secretions than the control. After ventilator-induced hyperinflation in sidelying, respiratory compliance had increased 4.7 ml/cmH2O (95% CI 2.6 to 6.8) more than in sidelying alone. There was no difference in total resistance of the respiratory system between the interventions (mean difference 0.3 cmH2O/l/s, 95% CI –0.8 to 1.3).

Conclusion

The application of hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation in mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection improves secretion clearance and increases static compliance of the respiratory system.

一项随机交叉试验:使用压力支持通气的过度充气可改善肺部感染通气患者的分泌物清除率和呼吸力学
对肺部感染的通气患者,在清除分泌物和改善呼吸力学方面,呼吸机诱导的恶性充气辅助通气是否比单独辅助通气更有效?设计随机交叉试验,采用隐蔽分配和意向治疗分析。研究对象为30例在成人重症监护病房接受机械通气的肺部感染患者。干预:实验干预为30分钟的呼吸机诱导恶性充气,采用压力支持通气辅助通气;对照组干预为30分钟的旁听。参与者在同一天接受了两种干预,中间有5个小时的洗脱期。结果测量:在干预期间以痰量来测量分泌物清除率。呼吸力学测量为干预前后呼吸系统的静态顺应性和总阻力。结果实验组比对照组多清除1.3 ml (95% CI 0.5 ~ 2.2)分泌物。在呼吸机诱导的侧化过度充气后,呼吸顺应性比单独侧化组增加4.7 ml/cmH2O (95% CI 2.6 - 6.8)。两种干预措施之间呼吸系统总阻力无差异(平均差异0.3 cmH2O/l/s, 95% CI -0.8 ~ 1.3)。结论在机械通气的肺部感染患者中应用高压通气可改善分泌物清除率,增加呼吸系统的静态顺应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信