Association between the electromyographic fatigue threshold and ventilatory threshold.

T V Camata, T R Lacerda, L R Altimari, H Bortolloti, E B Fontes, J L Dantas, F Y Nakamura, T Abrão, M P T Chacon-Mikahil, A C Moraes
{"title":"Association between the electromyographic fatigue threshold and ventilatory threshold.","authors":"T V Camata,&nbsp;T R Lacerda,&nbsp;L R Altimari,&nbsp;H Bortolloti,&nbsp;E B Fontes,&nbsp;J L Dantas,&nbsp;F Y Nakamura,&nbsp;T Abrão,&nbsp;M P T Chacon-Mikahil,&nbsp;A C Moraes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study is to verify the coincidence between the occurrence of the electromyographic fatigue threshold (EMGth) and the ventilatory threshold (Vth) in an incremental test in the cyclosimulator, as well as to compare the calculation of the RMS from the EMG signal using different time windows. Thirteen male cyclists (73.7 +/- 12.4 kg and 174.3 +/- 6.2 cm) performed a ramp incremental test (TI) in a cyclosimulator until voluntary exhaustion. Before the start of each TI subjects had the active bipolar electrodes placed over the superficial muscles of the quadriceps femoris (QF) of the right leg: rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL). The paired student's t test, pearson's correlation coefficient and the analysis method described by Bland and Altman for the determination of the concordance level were used for statistical analysis. The significance level adopted was P < 0.05. Although no significant differences were found between Vth and the EMGth calculated from windows of 2, 5, 10, 30 and 60 seconds in the studied muscles, it is suggested that the EMGth values determined from the calculation of the RMS curve with windows of 5 and 10 seconds seem to be more appropriate for the calculation of the RMS curve and determination of EMGth from visual inspection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"49 6-7","pages":"305-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to verify the coincidence between the occurrence of the electromyographic fatigue threshold (EMGth) and the ventilatory threshold (Vth) in an incremental test in the cyclosimulator, as well as to compare the calculation of the RMS from the EMG signal using different time windows. Thirteen male cyclists (73.7 +/- 12.4 kg and 174.3 +/- 6.2 cm) performed a ramp incremental test (TI) in a cyclosimulator until voluntary exhaustion. Before the start of each TI subjects had the active bipolar electrodes placed over the superficial muscles of the quadriceps femoris (QF) of the right leg: rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM) and vastus lateralis (VL). The paired student's t test, pearson's correlation coefficient and the analysis method described by Bland and Altman for the determination of the concordance level were used for statistical analysis. The significance level adopted was P < 0.05. Although no significant differences were found between Vth and the EMGth calculated from windows of 2, 5, 10, 30 and 60 seconds in the studied muscles, it is suggested that the EMGth values determined from the calculation of the RMS curve with windows of 5 and 10 seconds seem to be more appropriate for the calculation of the RMS curve and determination of EMGth from visual inspection.

肌电图疲劳阈值与通气阈值的关系。
本研究的目的是验证在循环模拟器的增量测试中肌电图疲劳阈值(EMGth)和通气阈值(Vth)的出现之间的一致性,并比较使用不同时间窗的肌电图信号计算的均数。13名男性自行车手(73.7 +/- 12.4 kg和174.3 +/- 6.2 cm)在自行车模拟器中进行斜坡增量测试(TI),直到自愿精疲力竭。在每个TI受试者开始之前,将活动双极电极置于右腿股四头肌(QF)的浅表肌肉上:股直肌(RF),股内侧肌(VM)和股外侧肌(VL)。采用配对学生t检验、pearson相关系数和Bland和Altman确定一致性水平的分析方法进行统计分析。采用的显著性水平为P < 0.05。虽然所研究肌肉的Vth与从2、5、10、30和60秒窗口计算的EMGth之间没有显著差异,但这表明,从5和10秒窗口的RMS曲线计算得到的EMGth值似乎更适合于RMS曲线的计算和目测EMGth的确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信