Study of interpolation method in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and comparison with midpalm antideromic sensory method.

M H Bahrami, S M Rayegani, F Nouri
{"title":"Study of interpolation method in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and comparison with midpalm antideromic sensory method.","authors":"M H Bahrami,&nbsp;S M Rayegani,&nbsp;F Nouri","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common focal compression neuropathy. There are a significant number of different methods available to evaluate a patient for median nerve compromise at the carpal tunnel. One of them is interpolation method created by Dr E.B. Bodofski. In our study Sensitivity of interpolation method was 85.5%, Specificity was 85%, Positive predictive value was 94.6% and Negative predictive value was 65.4%. These results are lower than Dr Bodofski results. Also in our study sensitivity of midpalm antidromic sensory method was 95.1%, Specificity was 95%, Positive predictive value was 98.3% and Negative predictive value was 86.4%, these results are higher than results of interpolation method. These show interpolation method is a good method (with high sensitivity & specificity) for diagnosis of mild CTS, but it's sensitivity & specificity are lower than antideromic sensory stimulation method at wrist & midpalm.</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"49 6-7","pages":"259-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common focal compression neuropathy. There are a significant number of different methods available to evaluate a patient for median nerve compromise at the carpal tunnel. One of them is interpolation method created by Dr E.B. Bodofski. In our study Sensitivity of interpolation method was 85.5%, Specificity was 85%, Positive predictive value was 94.6% and Negative predictive value was 65.4%. These results are lower than Dr Bodofski results. Also in our study sensitivity of midpalm antidromic sensory method was 95.1%, Specificity was 95%, Positive predictive value was 98.3% and Negative predictive value was 86.4%, these results are higher than results of interpolation method. These show interpolation method is a good method (with high sensitivity & specificity) for diagnosis of mild CTS, but it's sensitivity & specificity are lower than antideromic sensory stimulation method at wrist & midpalm.

内插法在腕管综合征诊断中的应用研究及与掌心抗皮感觉法的比较。
腕管综合征(CTS)是最常见的局灶性压迫神经病。有许多不同的方法可用于评估腕管处正中神经受损的患者。其中之一是由E.B. Bodofski博士发明的插值方法。在我们的研究中,插值方法的灵敏度为85.5%,特异性为85%,阳性预测值为94.6%,阴性预测值为65.4%。这些结果低于博多夫斯基博士的结果。中掌反位感觉法的敏感性为95.1%,特异性为95%,阳性预测值为98.3%,阴性预测值为86.4%,均高于插值法的结果。结果表明,内插法诊断轻度CTS具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,但其灵敏度和特异性均低于腕部和中掌部的抗皮肤刺激法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信