{"title":"Study of interpolation method in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and comparison with midpalm antideromic sensory method.","authors":"M H Bahrami, S M Rayegani, F Nouri","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common focal compression neuropathy. There are a significant number of different methods available to evaluate a patient for median nerve compromise at the carpal tunnel. One of them is interpolation method created by Dr E.B. Bodofski. In our study Sensitivity of interpolation method was 85.5%, Specificity was 85%, Positive predictive value was 94.6% and Negative predictive value was 65.4%. These results are lower than Dr Bodofski results. Also in our study sensitivity of midpalm antidromic sensory method was 95.1%, Specificity was 95%, Positive predictive value was 98.3% and Negative predictive value was 86.4%, these results are higher than results of interpolation method. These show interpolation method is a good method (with high sensitivity & specificity) for diagnosis of mild CTS, but it's sensitivity & specificity are lower than antideromic sensory stimulation method at wrist & midpalm.</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"49 6-7","pages":"259-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common focal compression neuropathy. There are a significant number of different methods available to evaluate a patient for median nerve compromise at the carpal tunnel. One of them is interpolation method created by Dr E.B. Bodofski. In our study Sensitivity of interpolation method was 85.5%, Specificity was 85%, Positive predictive value was 94.6% and Negative predictive value was 65.4%. These results are lower than Dr Bodofski results. Also in our study sensitivity of midpalm antidromic sensory method was 95.1%, Specificity was 95%, Positive predictive value was 98.3% and Negative predictive value was 86.4%, these results are higher than results of interpolation method. These show interpolation method is a good method (with high sensitivity & specificity) for diagnosis of mild CTS, but it's sensitivity & specificity are lower than antideromic sensory stimulation method at wrist & midpalm.