Synthetic graft use in vaginal prolapse surgery: objective and subjective outcomes.

International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction Pub Date : 2009-11-01 DOI:10.1007/s00192-009-0953-3

Luisa A Wetta, Kimberly A Gerten, Thomas L Wheeler, Robert L Holley, R Edward Varner, Holly E Richter

{"title":"Synthetic graft use in vaginal prolapse surgery: objective and subjective outcomes.","authors":"Luisa A Wetta, Kimberly A Gerten, Thomas L Wheeler, Robert L Holley, R Edward Varner, Holly E Richter","doi":"10.1007/s00192-009-0953-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and hypothesis: This study reports 1-year outcomes in women who underwent transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery with Prolift transvaginal mesh.Methods: Pre- and postoperative objective vaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) and subjective symptom and impact assessments (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ)-7, respectively) were performed. Postoperative vaginal tenderness, stricture, and patient satisfaction were also obtained. Paired t tests were utilized for analysis.Results: Mean age was 61.8 +/- 9.8 years; mean follow-up interval was 425.0 +/- 80.0 days (range, 237-717). POP-Q measurements of Ba, Bp, and C were significantly improved (all p values <or= 0.001). PFDI and PFIQ subscale scores significantly improved (all p values <or= 0.004). Thirty-five of 48 (73%) were completely satisfied, and two (4%) were not satisfied. Complications (n (percent)) included graft exposure (1 (2%)), dyspareunia (2 (4%)), and granulation tissue (3 (6%)).Conclusions: Women undergoing transvaginal repair of POP with the Prolift mesh system showed significant improvement in 1-year anatomic and subjective measures.","PeriodicalId":73495,"journal":{"name":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":"20 11","pages":"1307-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0953-3","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0953-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 28

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: This study reports 1-year outcomes in women who underwent transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery with Prolift transvaginal mesh.

Methods: Pre- and postoperative objective vaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) and subjective symptom and impact assessments (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ)-7, respectively) were performed. Postoperative vaginal tenderness, stricture, and patient satisfaction were also obtained. Paired t tests were utilized for analysis.

Results: Mean age was 61.8 +/- 9.8 years; mean follow-up interval was 425.0 +/- 80.0 days (range, 237-717). POP-Q measurements of Ba, Bp, and C were significantly improved (all p values

Conclusions: Women undergoing transvaginal repair of POP with the Prolift mesh system showed significant improvement in 1-year anatomic and subjective measures.

查看原文本刊更多论文

合成移植物在阴道脱垂手术中的应用:客观和主观结果。

前言和假设:本研究报告了使用proflift经阴道补片接受阴道盆腔器官脱垂(POP)手术的女性1年的预后。方法:进行术前、术后客观阴道盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)和主观症状及影响评估(盆底困扰量表(PFDI)-20和盆底影响问卷(PFIQ)-7)。术后阴道压痛、狭窄和患者满意度也得到了改善。采用配对t检验进行分析。结果:平均年龄61.8±9.8岁;平均随访时间为425.0±80.0天(范围237 ~ 717天)。结论:使用proflift网片系统经阴道修复POP的女性在1年的解剖和主观测量中均有显著改善。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction

自引率

0.00%

发文量