Cervical spondylosis with spinal cord encroachment: should preventive surgery be recommended?

Donald R Murphy, Christopher M Coulis, Jonathan K Gerrard
{"title":"Cervical spondylosis with spinal cord encroachment: should preventive surgery be recommended?","authors":"Donald R Murphy,&nbsp;Christopher M Coulis,&nbsp;Jonathan K Gerrard","doi":"10.1186/1746-1340-17-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been stated that individuals who have spondylotic encroachment on the cervical spinal cord without myelopathy are at increased risk of spinal cord injury if they experience minor trauma. Preventive decompression surgery has been recommended for these individuals. The purpose of this paper is to provide the non-surgical spine specialist with information upon which to base advice to patients. The evidence behind claims of increased risk is investigated as well as the evidence regarding the risk of decompression surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted on the risk of spinal cord injury in individuals with asymptomatic cord encroachment and the risk and benefit of preventive decompression surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three studies on the risk of spinal cord injury in this population met the inclusion criteria. All reported increased risk. However, none were prospective cohort studies or case-control studies, so the designs did not allow firm conclusions to be drawn. A number of studies and reviews of the risks and benefits of decompression surgery in patients with cervical myelopathy were found, but no studies were found that addressed surgery in asymptomatic individuals thought to be at risk. The complications of decompression surgery range from transient hoarseness to spinal cord injury, with rates ranging from 0.3% to 60%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is insufficient evidence that individuals with spondylotic spinal cord encroachment are at increased risk of spinal cord injury from minor trauma. Prospective cohort or case-control studies are needed to assess this risk. There is no evidence that prophylactic decompression surgery is helpful in this patient population. Decompression surgery appears to be helpful in patients with cervical myelopathy, but the significant risks may outweigh the unknown benefit in asymptomatic individuals. Thus, broad recommendations for decompression surgery in suspected at-risk individuals cannot be made. Recommendations to individual patients must consider possible unique circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":87173,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","volume":"17 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-17-8","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-17-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: It has been stated that individuals who have spondylotic encroachment on the cervical spinal cord without myelopathy are at increased risk of spinal cord injury if they experience minor trauma. Preventive decompression surgery has been recommended for these individuals. The purpose of this paper is to provide the non-surgical spine specialist with information upon which to base advice to patients. The evidence behind claims of increased risk is investigated as well as the evidence regarding the risk of decompression surgery.

Methods: A literature search was conducted on the risk of spinal cord injury in individuals with asymptomatic cord encroachment and the risk and benefit of preventive decompression surgery.

Results: Three studies on the risk of spinal cord injury in this population met the inclusion criteria. All reported increased risk. However, none were prospective cohort studies or case-control studies, so the designs did not allow firm conclusions to be drawn. A number of studies and reviews of the risks and benefits of decompression surgery in patients with cervical myelopathy were found, but no studies were found that addressed surgery in asymptomatic individuals thought to be at risk. The complications of decompression surgery range from transient hoarseness to spinal cord injury, with rates ranging from 0.3% to 60%.

Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence that individuals with spondylotic spinal cord encroachment are at increased risk of spinal cord injury from minor trauma. Prospective cohort or case-control studies are needed to assess this risk. There is no evidence that prophylactic decompression surgery is helpful in this patient population. Decompression surgery appears to be helpful in patients with cervical myelopathy, but the significant risks may outweigh the unknown benefit in asymptomatic individuals. Thus, broad recommendations for decompression surgery in suspected at-risk individuals cannot be made. Recommendations to individual patients must consider possible unique circumstances.

颈椎病伴脊髓侵犯:是否应推荐预防性手术?
背景:已有研究表明,没有脊髓病的颈椎病侵犯颈脊髓的个体,如果经历轻微创伤,脊髓损伤的风险增加。预防性减压手术已被推荐用于这些个体。本文的目的是为非手术脊柱专科医生提供信息,根据这些信息向患者提供建议。对风险增加的证据以及减压手术风险的证据进行了调查。方法:对无症状脊髓侵犯患者发生脊髓损伤的风险及预防性减压手术的风险和获益进行文献检索。结果:有3项关于该人群脊髓损伤风险的研究符合纳入标准。所有报告的风险都增加了。然而,没有前瞻性队列研究或病例对照研究,因此设计不允许得出确定的结论。对颈椎病患者进行减压手术的风险和益处进行了大量的研究和回顾,但没有研究发现对被认为有风险的无症状个体进行手术。减压手术的并发症从短暂性声音嘶哑到脊髓损伤,发生率从0.3%到60%不等。结论:没有足够的证据表明脊椎型颈椎病患者在轻微创伤中脊髓损伤的风险增加。需要前瞻性队列研究或病例对照研究来评估这种风险。没有证据表明预防性减压手术对这类患者有帮助。减压手术似乎对颈椎病患者有帮助,但在无症状个体中,明显的风险可能超过未知的益处。因此,不能对疑似高危人群进行减压手术的广泛建议。对个别患者的建议必须考虑可能的独特情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信