Medication safety in acute care in Australia: where are we now? Part 2: a review of strategies and activities for improving medication safety 2002-2008.

Susan J Semple, Elizabeth E Roughead
{"title":"Medication safety in acute care in Australia: where are we now? Part 2: a review of strategies and activities for improving medication safety 2002-2008.","authors":"Susan J Semple,&nbsp;Elizabeth E Roughead","doi":"10.1186/1743-8462-6-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper presents Part 2 of a literature review examining medication safety in the Australian acute care setting. This review was undertaken for the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, updating the 2002 national report on medication safety. Part 2 of the review examined the Australian evidence base for approaches to build safer medication systems in acute care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted to identify Australian studies and programs published from 2002 to 2008 which examined strategies and activities for improving medication safety in acute care.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>Since 2002 there has been significant progress in strategies to improve prescription writing in hospitals with the introduction of a National Inpatient Medication Chart. There are also systems in place to ensure a nationally coordinated approach to the ongoing optimisation of the chart. Progress has been made with Australian research examining the implementation of computerised prescribing systems with clinical decision support. These studies have highlighted barriers and facilitators to the introduction of such systems that can inform wider implementation. However, Australian studies assessing outcomes of this strategy on medication incidents or patient outcomes are still lacking. In studies assessing education for reducing medication errors, academic detailing has been demonstrated to reduce errors in prescriptions for Schedule 8 medicines and a program was shown to be effective in reducing error prone prescribing abbreviations. Published studies continue to support the role of clinical pharmacist services in improving medication safety. Studies on strategies to improve communication between different care settings, such as liaison pharmacist services, have focussed on implementation issues now that funding is available for community-based services. Double checking versus single-checking by nurses and patient self-administration in hospital has been assessed in small studies. No new studies were located assessing the impact of individual patient medication supply, adverse drug event alerts or bar coding. There is still limited research assessing the impact of an integrated systems approach on medication safety in Australian acute care.</p>","PeriodicalId":87170,"journal":{"name":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","volume":"6 ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-6-24","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-6-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This paper presents Part 2 of a literature review examining medication safety in the Australian acute care setting. This review was undertaken for the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, updating the 2002 national report on medication safety. Part 2 of the review examined the Australian evidence base for approaches to build safer medication systems in acute care.

Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify Australian studies and programs published from 2002 to 2008 which examined strategies and activities for improving medication safety in acute care.

Results and conclusion: Since 2002 there has been significant progress in strategies to improve prescription writing in hospitals with the introduction of a National Inpatient Medication Chart. There are also systems in place to ensure a nationally coordinated approach to the ongoing optimisation of the chart. Progress has been made with Australian research examining the implementation of computerised prescribing systems with clinical decision support. These studies have highlighted barriers and facilitators to the introduction of such systems that can inform wider implementation. However, Australian studies assessing outcomes of this strategy on medication incidents or patient outcomes are still lacking. In studies assessing education for reducing medication errors, academic detailing has been demonstrated to reduce errors in prescriptions for Schedule 8 medicines and a program was shown to be effective in reducing error prone prescribing abbreviations. Published studies continue to support the role of clinical pharmacist services in improving medication safety. Studies on strategies to improve communication between different care settings, such as liaison pharmacist services, have focussed on implementation issues now that funding is available for community-based services. Double checking versus single-checking by nurses and patient self-administration in hospital has been assessed in small studies. No new studies were located assessing the impact of individual patient medication supply, adverse drug event alerts or bar coding. There is still limited research assessing the impact of an integrated systems approach on medication safety in Australian acute care.

澳大利亚急症护理中的用药安全:我们现在在哪里?第2部分:2002-2008年改善药物安全的策略和活动回顾。
背景:本文介绍了在澳大利亚急性护理环境中检查药物安全的文献综述的第2部分。这项审查是为澳大利亚卫生保健安全和质量委员会进行的,更新了2002年关于药品安全的国家报告。本综述的第2部分审查了澳大利亚在急症护理中建立更安全用药系统的方法的证据基础。方法:进行文献检索,以确定2002年至2008年发表的澳大利亚研究和项目,这些研究和项目检查了改善急性护理用药安全的策略和活动。结果和结论:自2002年以来,在引进全国住院病人用药图表后,改善医院处方书写的战略取得了重大进展。此外,还建立了一些制度,以确保采取国家协调的办法,不断优化该图表。澳大利亚的研究检查了计算机处方系统与临床决策支持的实施,取得了进展。这些研究突出了采用这种制度的障碍和促进因素,这些制度可以为更广泛的实施提供信息。然而,澳大利亚评估该策略对药物事件或患者结果的结果的研究仍然缺乏。在评估教育减少用药错误的研究中,学术细节已被证明可以减少附表8药品的处方错误,一个项目被证明可以有效减少容易出错的处方缩写。已发表的研究继续支持临床药师服务在改善用药安全方面的作用。关于改善不同护理环境之间沟通的战略的研究,如联络药剂师服务,集中在实施问题上,因为社区服务有资金可用。在一些小型研究中,已经对护士的双重检查与单一检查以及医院患者的自我管理进行了评估。没有新的研究评估个体患者药物供应、不良药物事件警报或条形码的影响。评估综合系统方法对澳大利亚急性护理药物安全的影响的研究仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信