Has the influence of managed care waned? Evidence from the market for physician services.

Hai Fang, John A Rizzo
{"title":"Has the influence of managed care waned? Evidence from the market for physician services.","authors":"Hai Fang,&nbsp;John A Rizzo","doi":"10.1007/s10754-009-9073-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Managed care has been the dominant organization of health care coverage in the United States, and seeks to achieve cost control by constraining services. The restrictive practices of managed care organizations have been widely criticized and the role of managed care in constraining health care services may be declining. Physician behavior is also believed to be influenced by the practices of managed care organization. This study examines the evolving nature of managed care and its restrictive effects on the provision of physician services. Physicians can choose whether and to what extent they are involved in managed care, so it is an endogenous decision. We employ instrumental variables method to correct for this endogeneity. Using data from the Community Tracking Study physician surveys from 2000-2001 and 2004-2005, we find that managed care organizations have became relatively less restrictive over time in terms of limiting the provision of physician services, compared to non-managed care organizations. These results suggest that managed care and non-managed care are converging in their effects on the provision of physician services.</p>","PeriodicalId":73453,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health care finance and economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10754-009-9073-3","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health care finance and economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-009-9073-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Managed care has been the dominant organization of health care coverage in the United States, and seeks to achieve cost control by constraining services. The restrictive practices of managed care organizations have been widely criticized and the role of managed care in constraining health care services may be declining. Physician behavior is also believed to be influenced by the practices of managed care organization. This study examines the evolving nature of managed care and its restrictive effects on the provision of physician services. Physicians can choose whether and to what extent they are involved in managed care, so it is an endogenous decision. We employ instrumental variables method to correct for this endogeneity. Using data from the Community Tracking Study physician surveys from 2000-2001 and 2004-2005, we find that managed care organizations have became relatively less restrictive over time in terms of limiting the provision of physician services, compared to non-managed care organizations. These results suggest that managed care and non-managed care are converging in their effects on the provision of physician services.

管理式医疗的影响减弱了吗?来自医生服务市场的证据。
管理式医疗一直是美国医疗保健覆盖的主要组织,并试图通过限制服务来实现成本控制。管理式护理组织的限制性做法受到了广泛的批评,管理式护理在限制卫生保健服务方面的作用可能正在下降。医生的行为也被认为受到管理式医疗组织的影响。本研究考察了管理式护理的演变性质及其对医生服务提供的限制作用。医生可以选择是否以及在多大程度上参与管理式医疗,所以这是一个内生的决定。我们采用工具变量法来纠正这种内生性。利用2000-2001年和2004-2005年社区跟踪研究医生调查的数据,我们发现,与非管理式医疗机构相比,管理式医疗机构在限制医生服务提供方面的限制相对较少。这些结果表明,管理式护理和非管理式护理在提供医生服务方面的影响正在趋同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信