The Nordic maintenance care program: case management of chiropractic patients with low back pain--defining the patients suitable for various management strategies.

Stefan Malmqvist, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
{"title":"The Nordic maintenance care program: case management of chiropractic patients with low back pain--defining the patients suitable for various management strategies.","authors":"Stefan Malmqvist,&nbsp;Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde","doi":"10.1186/1746-1340-17-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maintenance care is a well known concept among chiropractors, although there is little knowledge about its exact definition, its indications and usefulness. As an initial step in a research program on this phenomenon, it was necessary to identify chiropractors' rationale for their use of maintenance care. Previous studies have identified chiropractors' choices of case management strategies in response to different case scenarios. However, the rationale for these management strategies is not known. In other words, when presented with both the case, and different management strategies, there was consensus on how to match these, but if only the management strategies were provided, would chiropractors be able to define the cases to fit these strategies? The objective with this study was to investigate if there is a common pattern in Finnish chiropractors' case management of patients with low back pain (LBP), with special emphasis on long-term treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Information was obtained in a structured workshop. Fifteen chiropractors, members of the Finnish Chiropractors' Union, and present at the general assembly, participated throughout the entire workshop session. These were divided into five teams each consisting of 3 people. A basic case of a patient with low back pain was presented together with six different management strategies undertaken after one month of treatment. Each team was then asked to describe one (or several) suitable case(s) for each of the six strategies, based on the aspects of 1) symptoms/findings, 2) the low back pain history in the past year, and 3) other observations. After each session the people in the groups were changed. Responses were collected as key words on flip-over boards. These responses were grouped and counted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There appeared to be consensus among the participants in relation to the rationale for at least four of the management strategies and partial consensus on the rationale for the remaining two. In relation to maintenance care, the patient's past history was important but also the doctor-patient relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results confirm that there is a pattern among Nordic chiropractors in how they manage patients with LBP. More information is needed to define the \"cut-point\" for the indication of prolonged care.</p>","PeriodicalId":87173,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","volume":"17 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1746-1340-17-7","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & osteopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-17-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background: Maintenance care is a well known concept among chiropractors, although there is little knowledge about its exact definition, its indications and usefulness. As an initial step in a research program on this phenomenon, it was necessary to identify chiropractors' rationale for their use of maintenance care. Previous studies have identified chiropractors' choices of case management strategies in response to different case scenarios. However, the rationale for these management strategies is not known. In other words, when presented with both the case, and different management strategies, there was consensus on how to match these, but if only the management strategies were provided, would chiropractors be able to define the cases to fit these strategies? The objective with this study was to investigate if there is a common pattern in Finnish chiropractors' case management of patients with low back pain (LBP), with special emphasis on long-term treatment.

Methods: Information was obtained in a structured workshop. Fifteen chiropractors, members of the Finnish Chiropractors' Union, and present at the general assembly, participated throughout the entire workshop session. These were divided into five teams each consisting of 3 people. A basic case of a patient with low back pain was presented together with six different management strategies undertaken after one month of treatment. Each team was then asked to describe one (or several) suitable case(s) for each of the six strategies, based on the aspects of 1) symptoms/findings, 2) the low back pain history in the past year, and 3) other observations. After each session the people in the groups were changed. Responses were collected as key words on flip-over boards. These responses were grouped and counted.

Results: There appeared to be consensus among the participants in relation to the rationale for at least four of the management strategies and partial consensus on the rationale for the remaining two. In relation to maintenance care, the patient's past history was important but also the doctor-patient relationship.

Conclusion: These results confirm that there is a pattern among Nordic chiropractors in how they manage patients with LBP. More information is needed to define the "cut-point" for the indication of prolonged care.

北欧维持护理项目:腰痛整脊患者的病例管理——确定适合各种管理策略的患者。
背景:保养护理是一个众所周知的概念,尽管对其确切定义,适应症和用途知之甚少。作为研究这一现象的第一步,有必要确定脊医使用保养护理的理由。以前的研究已经确定了脊医在不同情况下对病例管理策略的选择。然而,这些管理策略的基本原理尚不清楚。换句话说,当我们同时看到病例和不同的管理策略时,人们对如何匹配这些策略达成了共识,但如果只提供管理策略,脊医是否能够定义适合这些策略的病例?本研究的目的是调查芬兰脊医对腰痛(LBP)患者的病例管理是否有一个共同的模式,特别强调长期治疗。方法:在一个结构化的车间中获取信息。15名按摩师,芬兰按摩师联盟的成员,出席了大会,参加了整个研讨会。他们被分成5个小组,每组3人。一个基本的情况下,病人腰痛提出了六个不同的管理策略后,一个月的治疗。然后,每个小组被要求根据1)症状/发现,2)过去一年的腰痛病史,以及3)其他观察结果,为六种策略中的每一种描述一个(或几个)合适的病例。每次会议结束后,小组中的人都被换了。在翻转板上收集反馈作为关键词。对这些回答进行分组和统计。结果:参与者似乎对至少四种管理策略的基本原理达成了共识,对其余两种策略的基本原理达成了部分共识。在维持护理方面,病人的病史很重要,但医患关系也很重要。结论:这些结果证实北欧脊医在治疗腰痛患者方面存在一种模式。需要更多的信息来定义长期护理指征的“临界点”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信