The geographic distribution of private health insurance in Australia in 2001.

John Glover, Sarah Tennant, Stephen Duckett
{"title":"The geographic distribution of private health insurance in Australia in 2001.","authors":"John Glover,&nbsp;Sarah Tennant,&nbsp;Stephen Duckett","doi":"10.1186/1743-8462-6-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Private health insurance has been a major focus of Commonwealth Government health policy for the last decade. Over this period, the Howard government introduced a number of policy changes which impacted on the take up of private health insurance. The most expensive of these was the introduction of the private health insurance rebate in 1997, which had an estimated cost of $3 billion per annum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article uses information on the geographic distribution of the population with private health insurance cover to identify associations between rates of private health insurance cover and socioeconomic status. The geographic analysis is repeated with survey data on expenditure on private health insurance, to provide an estimate of the rebate flowing to different socioeconomic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis highlights the strong association between high rates of private health insurance cover and high socioeconomic status and shows the substantial transfer of funds, under the private health insurance rebate, to those living in areas of highest socioeconomic status, compared with those in areas of lower socioeconomic status, and in particular those in the most disadvantaged areas. The article also provides estimates of private health insurance cover by federal electorate, emphasising the substantial gaps in cover between Liberal Party and Australian Labor Party seats.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The article concludes by discussing implications of the uneven distribution of private health insurance cover across Australia for policy formation. In particular, the study shows that the prevalence of private health insurance is unevenly distributed across Australia, with marked differences in prevalence in rural and urban areas, and substantial differences by socioeconomic status. Policy formation needs to take this into account. Evaluating the potential impact of changes in private health insurance requires more nuanced consideration than has been implied in the rhetoric about private health insurance over the last decade.</p>","PeriodicalId":87170,"journal":{"name":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","volume":"6 ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-6-19","citationCount":"172","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-6-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 172

Abstract

Background: Private health insurance has been a major focus of Commonwealth Government health policy for the last decade. Over this period, the Howard government introduced a number of policy changes which impacted on the take up of private health insurance. The most expensive of these was the introduction of the private health insurance rebate in 1997, which had an estimated cost of $3 billion per annum.

Methods: This article uses information on the geographic distribution of the population with private health insurance cover to identify associations between rates of private health insurance cover and socioeconomic status. The geographic analysis is repeated with survey data on expenditure on private health insurance, to provide an estimate of the rebate flowing to different socioeconomic groups.

Results: The analysis highlights the strong association between high rates of private health insurance cover and high socioeconomic status and shows the substantial transfer of funds, under the private health insurance rebate, to those living in areas of highest socioeconomic status, compared with those in areas of lower socioeconomic status, and in particular those in the most disadvantaged areas. The article also provides estimates of private health insurance cover by federal electorate, emphasising the substantial gaps in cover between Liberal Party and Australian Labor Party seats.

Conclusion: The article concludes by discussing implications of the uneven distribution of private health insurance cover across Australia for policy formation. In particular, the study shows that the prevalence of private health insurance is unevenly distributed across Australia, with marked differences in prevalence in rural and urban areas, and substantial differences by socioeconomic status. Policy formation needs to take this into account. Evaluating the potential impact of changes in private health insurance requires more nuanced consideration than has been implied in the rhetoric about private health insurance over the last decade.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2001年澳大利亚私人医疗保险的地理分布情况。
背景:过去十年来,私人健康保险一直是联邦政府卫生政策的一个主要重点。在此期间,霍华德政府引入了一些政策变化,这些变化对私人健康保险的采用产生了影响。其中最昂贵的是1997年引入的私人医疗保险回扣,估计每年的费用为30亿美元。方法:本文利用私人健康保险人口的地理分布信息来确定私人健康保险覆盖率与社会经济地位之间的关系。利用关于私人医疗保险支出的调查数据重复进行地理分析,以估计流向不同社会经济群体的回扣。结果:分析强调了高私人医疗保险覆盖率与高社会经济地位之间的密切联系,并表明,与社会经济地位较低的地区相比,在私人医疗保险回扣下,生活在社会经济地位最高地区的人,特别是生活在最贫困地区的人,获得了大量资金。文章还提供了联邦选民对私人医疗保险覆盖范围的估计,强调了自由党和澳大利亚工党席位之间覆盖范围的巨大差距。结论:文章最后讨论了私人健康保险覆盖在澳大利亚政策形成的不平衡分布的影响。特别是,该研究表明,私人医疗保险的普及在澳大利亚各地分布不均,农村和城市地区的普及程度存在显著差异,社会经济地位也存在巨大差异。政策制定需要考虑到这一点。评估私人医疗保险变化的潜在影响,需要比过去十年关于私人医疗保险的言论所暗示的更细致入微的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信