Multivariate analysis of infant death in England and Wales in 2005-06, with focus on socio-economic status and deprivation.

Laura Oakley, Noreen Maconochie, Pat Doyle, Nirupa Dattani, Kath Moser
{"title":"Multivariate analysis of infant death in England and Wales in 2005-06, with focus on socio-economic status and deprivation.","authors":"Laura Oakley,&nbsp;Noreen Maconochie,&nbsp;Pat Doyle,&nbsp;Nirupa Dattani,&nbsp;Kath Moser","doi":"10.1057/hsq.2009.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current health inequality targets include the goal of reducing the differential in infant mortality between social groups. This article reports on a multivariate analysis of risk factors for infant mortality, with specific focus on deprivation and socio-economic status. Data on all singleton live births in England and Wales in 2005-06 were used, and deprivation quintile (Carstairs index) was assigned to each birth using postcode at birth registration. Deprivation had a strong independent effect on infant mortality, risk of death tending to increase with increasing levels of deprivation. The strength of this relationship depended, however, on whether the babies were low birthweight, preterm or small-for-gestational-age. Trends of increasing mortality risk with increasing deprivation were strongest in the postneonatal period. Uniquely, this article reports the number and proportion of all infant deaths which would potentially be avoided if all levels of deprivation were reduced to that of the least deprived group. It estimates that one quarter of all infant deaths would potentially be avoided if deprivation levels were reduced in this way.</p>","PeriodicalId":87183,"journal":{"name":"Health statistics quarterly","volume":" 42","pages":"22-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1057/hsq.2009.15","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health statistics quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/hsq.2009.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

Current health inequality targets include the goal of reducing the differential in infant mortality between social groups. This article reports on a multivariate analysis of risk factors for infant mortality, with specific focus on deprivation and socio-economic status. Data on all singleton live births in England and Wales in 2005-06 were used, and deprivation quintile (Carstairs index) was assigned to each birth using postcode at birth registration. Deprivation had a strong independent effect on infant mortality, risk of death tending to increase with increasing levels of deprivation. The strength of this relationship depended, however, on whether the babies were low birthweight, preterm or small-for-gestational-age. Trends of increasing mortality risk with increasing deprivation were strongest in the postneonatal period. Uniquely, this article reports the number and proportion of all infant deaths which would potentially be avoided if all levels of deprivation were reduced to that of the least deprived group. It estimates that one quarter of all infant deaths would potentially be avoided if deprivation levels were reduced in this way.

2005- 2006年英格兰和威尔士婴儿死亡的多变量分析,重点是社会经济地位和贫困。
目前的卫生不平等目标包括减少社会群体之间婴儿死亡率差异的目标。本文报告了婴儿死亡风险因素的多变量分析,特别关注贫困和社会经济地位。使用了2005- 2006年英格兰和威尔士所有单胎活产的数据,并使用出生登记时的邮政编码为每个出生分配了剥夺五分位数(Carstairs指数)。贫困对婴儿死亡率有很强的独立影响,死亡风险往往随着贫困程度的增加而增加。然而,这种关系的强度取决于婴儿是低出生体重、早产还是胎龄小。随着贫困程度的增加,死亡风险增加的趋势在新生儿后期最为明显。独特的是,本文报告了如果将所有贫困程度降低到最贫困群体的水平,就有可能避免的所有婴儿死亡人数和比例。据估计,如果以这种方式降低贫困程度,就有可能避免四分之一的婴儿死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书