Social inequalities in adult female mortality by the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification, England and Wales, 2001-03.

Ann Langford, Brian Johnson
{"title":"Social inequalities in adult female mortality by the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification, England and Wales, 2001-03.","authors":"Ann Langford,&nbsp;Brian Johnson","doi":"10.1057/hsq.2009.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This analysis of mortality in women aged 25-59 in 2001-03 found that those in the least advantaged social economic class had a mortality rate around twice that of women in the most advantaged class. This article uses the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC) and examines the relative merits of classification based on a woman's 'own' occupation as opposed to a 'combined' classification which also takes into account the husband's NS-SEC class, where available. The results demonstrate a strong socio-economic gradient in mortality for adult women under both classification methods. Under the 'combined' classification, women in the least advantaged NS-SEC class had a mortality rate 2.6 times that of those in the most advantaged class. Based on the women's'own' occupation, the comparable ratio was 1.9. These results set a benchmark for the future monitoring of socio-economic mortality inequalities in women, and also provide a comparison between inequalities affecting women and men.</p>","PeriodicalId":87183,"journal":{"name":"Health statistics quarterly","volume":" 42","pages":"6-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1057/hsq.2009.14","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health statistics quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/hsq.2009.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

This analysis of mortality in women aged 25-59 in 2001-03 found that those in the least advantaged social economic class had a mortality rate around twice that of women in the most advantaged class. This article uses the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC) and examines the relative merits of classification based on a woman's 'own' occupation as opposed to a 'combined' classification which also takes into account the husband's NS-SEC class, where available. The results demonstrate a strong socio-economic gradient in mortality for adult women under both classification methods. Under the 'combined' classification, women in the least advantaged NS-SEC class had a mortality rate 2.6 times that of those in the most advantaged class. Based on the women's'own' occupation, the comparable ratio was 1.9. These results set a benchmark for the future monitoring of socio-economic mortality inequalities in women, and also provide a comparison between inequalities affecting women and men.

2001- 2003年英格兰和威尔士国家统计社会经济分类中成年女性死亡率的社会不平等现象。
这项对2001- 2003年25-59岁妇女死亡率的分析发现,处于最不利社会经济阶层的妇女死亡率大约是处于最有利社会经济阶层妇女死亡率的两倍。本文使用了国家统计社会经济分类(NS-SEC),并研究了基于女性“自己”职业的分类的相对优点,而不是考虑到丈夫的NS-SEC类别(如果有的话)的“综合”分类。结果表明,在两种分类方法下,成年妇女的死亡率具有很强的社会经济梯度。根据"综合"分类,处于最不利地位的NS-SEC阶层妇女的死亡率是处于最有利地位阶层妇女的2.6倍。以女性“自己”的职业为基础,这一可比比率为1.9。这些结果为今后监测妇女的社会经济死亡率不平等设定了基准,并提供了影响妇女和男子的不平等之间的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书