Emotion, decision-making and the brain.

Luke J Chang, Alan G Sanfey
{"title":"Emotion, decision-making and the brain.","authors":"Luke J Chang,&nbsp;Alan G Sanfey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Initial explorations in the burgeoning field of neuroeconomics have highlighted evidence supporting a potential dissociation between a fast automatic system and a slow deliberative controlled system. Growing research in the role of emotion in decision-making has attempted to draw parallels to the automatic system. This chapter will discuss a theoretical framework for understanding the role of emotion in decision-making and evidence supporting the underlying neural substrates.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This chapter applies a conceptual framework to understanding the role of emotion in decision-making, and emphasizes a distinction between expected and immediate emotions. Expected emotions refer to anticipated emotional states associated with a given decision that are never actually experienced. Immediate emotions, however, are experienced at the time of decision, and either can occur in response to a particular decision or merely as a result of a transitory fluctuation. This chapter will review research from the neuroeconomics literature that supports a neural dissociation between these two classes of emotion and also discuss a few interpretive caveats.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Several lines of research including regret, uncertainty, social decision-making, and moral decision-making have yielded evidence consistent with our formulization--expected and immediate emotions may invoke dissociable neural systems.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This chapter provides a more specific conceptualization of the mediating role of emotions in the decision-making process, which has important implications for understanding the interacting neural systems underlying the interface between emotion and cognition--a topic of immediate value to anyone investigating topics within the context of social-cognitive-affective-neuroscience.</p>","PeriodicalId":79553,"journal":{"name":"Advances in health economics and health services research","volume":"20 ","pages":"31-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in health economics and health services research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Initial explorations in the burgeoning field of neuroeconomics have highlighted evidence supporting a potential dissociation between a fast automatic system and a slow deliberative controlled system. Growing research in the role of emotion in decision-making has attempted to draw parallels to the automatic system. This chapter will discuss a theoretical framework for understanding the role of emotion in decision-making and evidence supporting the underlying neural substrates.

Design/methodology/approach: This chapter applies a conceptual framework to understanding the role of emotion in decision-making, and emphasizes a distinction between expected and immediate emotions. Expected emotions refer to anticipated emotional states associated with a given decision that are never actually experienced. Immediate emotions, however, are experienced at the time of decision, and either can occur in response to a particular decision or merely as a result of a transitory fluctuation. This chapter will review research from the neuroeconomics literature that supports a neural dissociation between these two classes of emotion and also discuss a few interpretive caveats.

Findings: Several lines of research including regret, uncertainty, social decision-making, and moral decision-making have yielded evidence consistent with our formulization--expected and immediate emotions may invoke dissociable neural systems.

Originality/value: This chapter provides a more specific conceptualization of the mediating role of emotions in the decision-making process, which has important implications for understanding the interacting neural systems underlying the interface between emotion and cognition--a topic of immediate value to anyone investigating topics within the context of social-cognitive-affective-neuroscience.

情感,决策和大脑。
目的:在新兴的神经经济学领域的初步探索已经突出了支持快速自动系统和缓慢审慎控制系统之间潜在分离的证据。越来越多关于情绪在决策中的作用的研究试图将其与自动系统相提并论。本章将讨论理解情绪在决策中的作用的理论框架和支持潜在神经基质的证据。设计/方法论/方法:本章应用概念框架来理解情绪在决策中的作用,并强调预期情绪和直接情绪之间的区别。预期情绪是指与特定决策相关的、从未实际经历过的预期情绪状态。然而,即时情绪是在做决定的时候经历的,既可以是对特定决定的反应,也可以仅仅是短暂波动的结果。本章将回顾神经经济学文献中支持这两类情绪之间神经分离的研究,并讨论一些解释性的警告。研究发现:包括后悔、不确定性、社会决策和道德决策在内的几项研究都得出了与我们的公式化相一致的证据——预期的和即时的情绪可能会调用可分离的神经系统。原创性/价值:本章对情绪在决策过程中的中介作用提供了更具体的概念化,这对于理解情绪和认知之间界面的相互作用的神经系统具有重要意义——这是一个对任何在社会认知情感神经科学背景下研究主题的人都具有直接价值的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信