Evaluation of effectiveness of local insulin injection in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patient with carpal tunnel syndrome.

A Ashraf, A R Moghtaderi, A H Yazdani, S Mirshams
{"title":"Evaluation of effectiveness of local insulin injection in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patient with carpal tunnel syndrome.","authors":"A Ashraf,&nbsp;A R Moghtaderi,&nbsp;A H Yazdani,&nbsp;S Mirshams","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common type of peripheral nerve entrapment and is a significant cause of morbidity. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) has more incidences in diabetic patients. It has been suggested that insulin has an effect on nerve regeneration similar to that of nerve growth factor (NGF). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of local insulin injection on the median nerve in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) who have mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We carried out a prospective, randomized, single-blind, case-controlled study in these patients. We randomly selected 50 patients, 20 of whom had bilateral mild-moderate CTS. Therefore we had 70 hands and categorized them into two groups. At the baseline we injected NPH insulin (10U) directly into the carpal tunnel in group 1, and performed physiotherapy for the other group (group 2). Two weeks later, NPH insulin (10U) was injected into the carpal tunnel again and we continued physiotherapy for group 2. Electrodiagnostic study was performed for these two groups before treatment and 4 weeks after the last injection and physiotherapy. The patients were followed up for 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups decrement of distal motor latency (DML) of the median nerves statistically was significant. In both groups, the increment of the sensory nerve conduction velocity was statistically significant. Also the decrement of pain, paresthesia, numbness, weakness/clumsiness and nocturnal awaking was statistically significant in both groups. But there was no significant difference between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Local insulin injection is an effective and safe treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome in NIDDM patients as physiotherapy</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"49 4","pages":"161-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common type of peripheral nerve entrapment and is a significant cause of morbidity. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) has more incidences in diabetic patients. It has been suggested that insulin has an effect on nerve regeneration similar to that of nerve growth factor (NGF). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of local insulin injection on the median nerve in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) who have mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Materials and methods: We carried out a prospective, randomized, single-blind, case-controlled study in these patients. We randomly selected 50 patients, 20 of whom had bilateral mild-moderate CTS. Therefore we had 70 hands and categorized them into two groups. At the baseline we injected NPH insulin (10U) directly into the carpal tunnel in group 1, and performed physiotherapy for the other group (group 2). Two weeks later, NPH insulin (10U) was injected into the carpal tunnel again and we continued physiotherapy for group 2. Electrodiagnostic study was performed for these two groups before treatment and 4 weeks after the last injection and physiotherapy. The patients were followed up for 6 weeks.

Results: In both groups decrement of distal motor latency (DML) of the median nerves statistically was significant. In both groups, the increment of the sensory nerve conduction velocity was statistically significant. Also the decrement of pain, paresthesia, numbness, weakness/clumsiness and nocturnal awaking was statistically significant in both groups. But there was no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusion: Local insulin injection is an effective and safe treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome in NIDDM patients as physiotherapy

非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病腕管综合征患者局部注射胰岛素的疗效评价。
背景:腕管综合征(Carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS)是周围神经卡压最常见的类型,也是发病率的重要原因。腕管综合征(Carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS)在糖尿病患者中发病率较高。有研究表明,胰岛素对神经再生的作用类似于神经生长因子(NGF)。因此,我们旨在评估非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)合并轻度至中度腕管综合征(CTS)患者正中神经局部注射胰岛素的有效性。材料和方法:我们对这些患者进行了前瞻性、随机、单盲、病例对照研究。我们随机选择50例患者,其中20例为双侧轻中度CTS。因此,我们有70只手,并将它们分为两组。组1在基线时直接向腕管内注射NPH胰岛素(10U),另一组(2组)进行物理治疗。2周后再次向腕管内注射NPH胰岛素(10U),组2继续物理治疗。两组分别于治疗前和末次注射及物理治疗后4周进行电诊断研究。随访6周。结果:两组正中神经远端运动潜伏期(DML)下降均有统计学意义。两组感觉神经传导速度的增加均有统计学意义。两组患者疼痛、感觉异常、麻木、虚弱/笨拙和夜间觉醒的减少也有统计学意义。但两组之间没有显著差异。结论:与物理治疗相比,局部注射胰岛素治疗NIDDM患者腕管综合征是一种安全有效的治疗方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信