National Cancer Institute–Sponsored Cooperative Groups: Changing Process to Speed Progress

Mike Montello PharmD, Margaret Mooney MD, Andrea Denicoff MS, Jeanne Adler MPH, Jacquelyn Goldberg JD, Jeffrey Abrams MD
{"title":"National Cancer Institute–Sponsored Cooperative Groups: Changing Process to Speed Progress","authors":"Mike Montello PharmD, Margaret Mooney MD, Andrea Denicoff MS, Jeanne Adler MPH, Jacquelyn Goldberg JD, Jeffrey Abrams MD","doi":"10.3816/CLM.2009.n.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent independent analyses of the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) clinical trials systems have indicated an urgent need to re-evaluate ingrained processes and to find novel solutions if investigators are to take full advantage of the scientific opportunities available today for clinical research.1-3 The NCI-sponsored Cooperative Groups remain NCI’s primary outlet for phase III definitive trials in cancer prevention, control, and treatment.4 Cooperative Groups have the significant advantage of maintaining a regulatory and operational foundation that is readily available and fully experienced in the conduct and coordination of large, multicenter trials. This infrastructure has undergone a series of changes since 2000 that have positively affected Group operations. Some of the most important ones include the pivotal role of the Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU), the NCI’s Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB), and the recently introduced Disease-Specific Steering Committees (DSSC). In order for these projects to achieve their aims, however, increased attention must be devoted to the numerous processes underlying clinical trial development.","PeriodicalId":100272,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CLM.2009.n.040","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557919011701925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent independent analyses of the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) clinical trials systems have indicated an urgent need to re-evaluate ingrained processes and to find novel solutions if investigators are to take full advantage of the scientific opportunities available today for clinical research.1-3 The NCI-sponsored Cooperative Groups remain NCI’s primary outlet for phase III definitive trials in cancer prevention, control, and treatment.4 Cooperative Groups have the significant advantage of maintaining a regulatory and operational foundation that is readily available and fully experienced in the conduct and coordination of large, multicenter trials. This infrastructure has undergone a series of changes since 2000 that have positively affected Group operations. Some of the most important ones include the pivotal role of the Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU), the NCI’s Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB), and the recently introduced Disease-Specific Steering Committees (DSSC). In order for these projects to achieve their aims, however, increased attention must be devoted to the numerous processes underlying clinical trial development.
国家癌症研究所赞助的合作小组:改变进程以加快进展
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信