{"title":"[Laparoscopic lymph node dissection: technique and results].","authors":"Markus C Fleisch, Daniel T Rein","doi":"10.1159/000213060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For 20 years laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortal lymph node dissection has become increasingly popular as part of minimally invasive surgical treatment concepts for women suffering from gynaecological malignancies. Especially patients suffering from early-stage cervical or endometrial cancers can benefit from the general advantages of a minimally invasive procedure if a comparable degree of radical surgery is achieved. The feasibility and case-control studies published so far suggest comparable indicators of radicality, such as the number of dissected lymph nodes, but also demonstrate potential advantages like a lower intra-operative blood loss, shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative complication rate in comparison with the conventional approach. Regarding long-term survival, reliable data from prospective randomized studies are still lacking but can be expected to be available in the near future.</p>","PeriodicalId":12827,"journal":{"name":"Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau","volume":"49 3","pages":"117-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000213060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000213060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For 20 years laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortal lymph node dissection has become increasingly popular as part of minimally invasive surgical treatment concepts for women suffering from gynaecological malignancies. Especially patients suffering from early-stage cervical or endometrial cancers can benefit from the general advantages of a minimally invasive procedure if a comparable degree of radical surgery is achieved. The feasibility and case-control studies published so far suggest comparable indicators of radicality, such as the number of dissected lymph nodes, but also demonstrate potential advantages like a lower intra-operative blood loss, shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative complication rate in comparison with the conventional approach. Regarding long-term survival, reliable data from prospective randomized studies are still lacking but can be expected to be available in the near future.