Bioinformatic analysis of xenobiotic reactive metabolite target proteins and their interacting partners.

Jianwen Fang, Yakov M Koen, Robert P Hanzlik
{"title":"Bioinformatic analysis of xenobiotic reactive metabolite target proteins and their interacting partners.","authors":"Jianwen Fang,&nbsp;Yakov M Koen,&nbsp;Robert P Hanzlik","doi":"10.1186/1472-6769-9-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Protein covalent binding by reactive metabolites of drugs, chemicals and natural products can lead to acute cytotoxicity. Recent rapid progress in reactive metabolite target protein identification has shown that adduction is surprisingly selective and inspired the hope that analysis of target proteins might reveal protein factors that differentiate target- vs. non-target proteins and illuminate mechanisms connecting covalent binding to cytotoxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sorting 171 known reactive metabolite target proteins revealed a number of GO categories and KEGG pathways to be significantly enriched in targets, but in most cases the classes were too large, and the \"percent coverage\" too small, to allow meaningful conclusions about mechanisms of toxicity. However, a similar analysis of the directlyinteracting partners of 28 common targets of multiple reactive metabolites revealed highly significant enrichments in terms likely to be highly relevant to cytotoxicity (e.g., MAP kinase pathways, apoptosis, response to unfolded protein). Machine learning was used to rank the contribution of 211 computed protein features to determining protein susceptibility to adduction. Protein lysine (but not cysteine) content and protein instability index (i.e., rate of turnover in vivo) were among the features most important to determining susceptibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As yet there is no good explanation for why some low-abundance proteins become heavily adducted while some abundant proteins become only lightly adducted in vivo. Analyzing the directly interacting partners of target proteins appears to yield greater insight into mechanisms of toxicity than analyzing target proteins per se. The insights provided can readily be formulated as hypotheses to test in future experimental studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":80682,"journal":{"name":"BMC chemical biology","volume":"9 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6769-9-5","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC chemical biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6769-9-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Background: Protein covalent binding by reactive metabolites of drugs, chemicals and natural products can lead to acute cytotoxicity. Recent rapid progress in reactive metabolite target protein identification has shown that adduction is surprisingly selective and inspired the hope that analysis of target proteins might reveal protein factors that differentiate target- vs. non-target proteins and illuminate mechanisms connecting covalent binding to cytotoxicity.

Results: Sorting 171 known reactive metabolite target proteins revealed a number of GO categories and KEGG pathways to be significantly enriched in targets, but in most cases the classes were too large, and the "percent coverage" too small, to allow meaningful conclusions about mechanisms of toxicity. However, a similar analysis of the directlyinteracting partners of 28 common targets of multiple reactive metabolites revealed highly significant enrichments in terms likely to be highly relevant to cytotoxicity (e.g., MAP kinase pathways, apoptosis, response to unfolded protein). Machine learning was used to rank the contribution of 211 computed protein features to determining protein susceptibility to adduction. Protein lysine (but not cysteine) content and protein instability index (i.e., rate of turnover in vivo) were among the features most important to determining susceptibility.

Conclusion: As yet there is no good explanation for why some low-abundance proteins become heavily adducted while some abundant proteins become only lightly adducted in vivo. Analyzing the directly interacting partners of target proteins appears to yield greater insight into mechanisms of toxicity than analyzing target proteins per se. The insights provided can readily be formulated as hypotheses to test in future experimental studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

外源反应代谢产物靶蛋白及其相互作用伙伴的生物信息学分析。
背景:药物、化学物质和天然产物的反应性代谢产物与蛋白质共价结合可导致急性细胞毒性。反应性代谢产物靶蛋白鉴定的最新快速进展表明,加合物具有令人惊讶的选择性,并激发了对靶蛋白的分析可能揭示区分靶蛋白与非靶蛋白的蛋白质因子的希望,并阐明共价结合与细胞毒性之间的机制。结果:对171种已知的反应性代谢产物靶蛋白进行分类,发现许多GO类别和KEGG途径在靶蛋白中显著富集,但在大多数情况下,这些类别太大,“百分比覆盖率”太小,无法就毒性机制得出有意义的结论。然而,对多种反应性代谢物的28个常见靶标的直接相互作用伴侣的类似分析显示,在可能与细胞毒性高度相关的方面(例如,MAP激酶途径、细胞凋亡、对未折叠蛋白的反应),存在高度显著的富集。机器学习用于对211个计算的蛋白质特征对确定蛋白质对加合物易感性的贡献进行排序。蛋白质赖氨酸(但不是半胱氨酸)含量和蛋白质不稳定性指数(即体内周转率)是确定易感性最重要的特征之一。结论:到目前为止,还没有很好的解释为什么一些低丰度的蛋白质在体内变得高度加合,而一些高丰度的蛋白质只变得轻微加合。分析靶蛋白的直接相互作用伴侣似乎比分析靶蛋白本身更能深入了解毒性机制。所提供的见解可以很容易地作为假设,在未来的实验研究中进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信