A multicenter review of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis practice patterns for blunt hepatic trauma.

Indraneel Datta, Chad G Ball, Lucas R Rudmik, Damian Paton-Gay, Deepak Bhayana, Peter Salat, Colin Schieman, Dean F Smith, Mary Vanwijngaarden-Stephens, John B Kortbeek
{"title":"A multicenter review of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis practice patterns for blunt hepatic trauma.","authors":"Indraneel Datta,&nbsp;Chad G Ball,&nbsp;Lucas R Rudmik,&nbsp;Damian Paton-Gay,&nbsp;Deepak Bhayana,&nbsp;Peter Salat,&nbsp;Colin Schieman,&nbsp;Dean F Smith,&nbsp;Mary Vanwijngaarden-Stephens,&nbsp;John B Kortbeek","doi":"10.1186/1752-2897-3-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-operative management of blunt hepatic trauma is successful in the majority of hemodynamically stable patients. Due to the risk of recurrent hemorrhage, pharmacologic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis is often delayed. The optimal timing of prophylaxis is unclear. A multi-centre, retrospective review of patients with blunt hepatic injuries presenting between 2000 and 2004 was performed. All patients had an ISS >/= 12 and a CT scan confirming hepatic trauma. Patients were categorized into: (1) early DVT prophylaxis (</= 48 hrs of admission), (2) delayed prophylaxis (>48 hrs), and (3) no prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Thirty-seven (25%) and 45 (42%) patients received early and delayed DVT prophylaxis respectively. The remainder (32%) received none. Mean hepatic injury grades were lower in the early prophylaxis group (II) compared to the delayed and no prophylaxis cohorts (III)(p = 0.002). The number of patients requiring post-admission blood transfusions was highest in the delayed group (44%) compared to the early (26%) and no prophylaxis (6%) groups (p = 0.03). No patient in the early prophylaxis cohort developed a DVT or required delayed angiographic or operative intervention. Two patients in the delayed group failed non-operative management. Eight (18%) patients in the delayed group developed a clinically significant DVT; 1 (2%) progressed to a PE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Practice patterns indicate that chemical DVT prophylaxis initiated within 48 hours of admission may be safe in patients with significant blunt hepatic trauma. Delays in prevention result in venothromboembolic events, but not in fewer blood transfusions or a decreased need for subsequent angiographic or operative therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":87652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","volume":"3 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1752-2897-3-7","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-3-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: Non-operative management of blunt hepatic trauma is successful in the majority of hemodynamically stable patients. Due to the risk of recurrent hemorrhage, pharmacologic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis is often delayed. The optimal timing of prophylaxis is unclear. A multi-centre, retrospective review of patients with blunt hepatic injuries presenting between 2000 and 2004 was performed. All patients had an ISS >/= 12 and a CT scan confirming hepatic trauma. Patients were categorized into: (1) early DVT prophylaxis (48 hrs), and (3) no prophylaxis.

Methods and results: Thirty-seven (25%) and 45 (42%) patients received early and delayed DVT prophylaxis respectively. The remainder (32%) received none. Mean hepatic injury grades were lower in the early prophylaxis group (II) compared to the delayed and no prophylaxis cohorts (III)(p = 0.002). The number of patients requiring post-admission blood transfusions was highest in the delayed group (44%) compared to the early (26%) and no prophylaxis (6%) groups (p = 0.03). No patient in the early prophylaxis cohort developed a DVT or required delayed angiographic or operative intervention. Two patients in the delayed group failed non-operative management. Eight (18%) patients in the delayed group developed a clinically significant DVT; 1 (2%) progressed to a PE.

Conclusion: Practice patterns indicate that chemical DVT prophylaxis initiated within 48 hours of admission may be safe in patients with significant blunt hepatic trauma. Delays in prevention result in venothromboembolic events, but not in fewer blood transfusions or a decreased need for subsequent angiographic or operative therapies.

钝性肝外伤深静脉血栓预防实践模式的多中心回顾。
背景:对于大多数血流动力学稳定的患者,非手术治疗钝性肝外伤是成功的。由于出血复发的风险,深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的药物预防往往被推迟。预防的最佳时机尚不清楚。对2000年至2004年间钝性肝损伤患者进行了多中心回顾性研究。所有患者ISS >/= 12, CT扫描证实肝损伤。患者分为:(1)早期DVT预防(48小时)和(3)未预防。方法与结果:37例(25%)和45例(42%)患者分别接受了早期和延迟DVT预防。其余的(32%)没有接受任何治疗。早期预防组(II)的平均肝损伤等级低于延迟预防组和无预防组(III)(p = 0.002)。与早期(26%)和无预防(6%)组相比,延迟组需要入院后输血的患者人数(44%)最高(p = 0.03)。早期预防队列中没有患者发生深静脉血栓或需要延迟血管造影或手术干预。延迟组2例患者非手术治疗失败。延迟组中8例(18%)患者出现临床显著的深静脉血栓;1例(2%)进展为PE。结论:实践模式表明,对于严重钝性肝外伤患者,入院48小时内开始化学DVT预防可能是安全的。延迟预防会导致静脉血栓栓塞事件,但不会减少输血或减少后续血管造影或手术治疗的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书