A portable system for collecting anatomical joint angles during stair ascent: a comparison with an optical tracking device.

Jeroen H M Bergmann, Ruth E Mayagoitia, Ian C H Smith
{"title":"A portable system for collecting anatomical joint angles during stair ascent: a comparison with an optical tracking device.","authors":"Jeroen H M Bergmann,&nbsp;Ruth E Mayagoitia,&nbsp;Ian C H Smith","doi":"10.1186/1476-5918-8-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessments of stair climbing in real-life situations using an optical tracking system are lacking, as it is difficult to adapt the system for use in and around full flights of stairs. Alternatively, a portable system that consists of inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to collect anatomical joint angles during stair ascent. The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical joint angles obtained by IMUs to those calculated from position data of an optical tracking device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anatomical joint angles of the thigh, knee and ankle, obtained using IMUs and an optical tracking device, were compared for fourteen healthy subjects. Joint kinematics obtained with the two measurement devices were evaluated by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE) and by calculating a two-tailed Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) between the two signals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strong mean correlations (range 0.93 to 0.99) were found for the angles between the two measurement devices, as well as an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 4 degrees over all the joint angles, showing that the IMUs are a satisfactory system for measuring anatomical joint angles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These highly portable body-worn inertial sensors can be used by clinicians and researchers alike, to accurately collect data during stair climbing in complex real-life situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":84611,"journal":{"name":"Dynamic medicine : DM","volume":"8 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1476-5918-8-3","citationCount":"91","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamic medicine : DM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-5918-8-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 91

Abstract

Background: Assessments of stair climbing in real-life situations using an optical tracking system are lacking, as it is difficult to adapt the system for use in and around full flights of stairs. Alternatively, a portable system that consists of inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to collect anatomical joint angles during stair ascent. The purpose of this study was to compare the anatomical joint angles obtained by IMUs to those calculated from position data of an optical tracking device.

Methods: Anatomical joint angles of the thigh, knee and ankle, obtained using IMUs and an optical tracking device, were compared for fourteen healthy subjects. Joint kinematics obtained with the two measurement devices were evaluated by calculating the root mean square error (RMSE) and by calculating a two-tailed Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) between the two signals.

Results: Strong mean correlations (range 0.93 to 0.99) were found for the angles between the two measurement devices, as well as an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 4 degrees over all the joint angles, showing that the IMUs are a satisfactory system for measuring anatomical joint angles.

Conclusion: These highly portable body-worn inertial sensors can be used by clinicians and researchers alike, to accurately collect data during stair climbing in complex real-life situations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种便携式系统,用于收集楼梯上升过程中的解剖关节角度:与光学跟踪装置的比较。
背景:利用光学跟踪系统对现实生活中爬楼梯的情况进行评估是缺乏的,因为很难使系统适应在整段楼梯内和周围使用。另外,由惯性测量单元(imu)组成的便携式系统可用于收集楼梯上升过程中的解剖关节角度。本研究的目的是比较imu获得的解剖关节角度与光学跟踪装置位置数据计算的关节角度。方法:对14例健康人的大腿、膝关节和踝关节的解剖角度进行比较。通过计算均方根误差(RMSE)和计算两个信号之间的双尾Pearson积矩相关系数(r)来评估两个测量装置获得的关节运动学。结果:两种测量装置之间的角度具有很强的平均相关性(范围为0.93至0.99),所有关节角度的平均均方根误差(RMSE)为4度,表明imu是一种令人满意的测量解剖关节角度的系统。结论:这些高度便携的穿戴式惯性传感器可以被临床医生和研究人员使用,在复杂的现实生活中准确地收集爬楼梯时的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书