Appropriateness of cholesterol management in primary care by sex and level of cardiovascular risk.

Ann Hiott Barham, David C Goff, Haiying Chen, Aarthi Balasubramanyam, Erica Rosenberger, Denise E Bonds, Alain G Bertoni
{"title":"Appropriateness of cholesterol management in primary care by sex and level of cardiovascular risk.","authors":"Ann Hiott Barham, David C Goff, Haiying Chen, Aarthi Balasubramanyam, Erica Rosenberger, Denise E Bonds, Alain G Bertoni","doi":"10.1111/j.1751-7141.2008.00019.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A study was undertaken to ascertain the appropriateness of lipid screening and management per the Third Report of the Adult Treatment Panel National Cholesterol Education Program (ATP III) guideline in a sample of North Carolina primary care practices. Demographics, cholesterol values, and comorbid conditions were abstracted from the medical records from 60 community practices participating in a randomized practice-based trial (Guideline Adherence for Heart Health). Eligible patients were aged 21 to 84 years, seen during the baseline period of June 1, 2001, through May 31, 2003, and who were not taking lipid-lowering therapy. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess whether age, sex, race/ethnicity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, ATP III risk category, or pretreatment low-density lipoprotein (LDL) influenced treatment. Among 5031 eligible patients, 1711 (34.5%) received screening lipid profiles. Screening rates were higher with older age, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. No large differences were seen by sex. Among patients screened (mean age, 51.6 years; 57.9% female), 76.6% were appropriately managed within 4 months. In adjusted analyses, older age was associated with less appropriate treatment (odds ratio [OR] per 5 years, 0.91; P=.01), and patients with LDL cholesterol <or=130 mg/dL (OR, 18.8; P<.001) and the low-risk group (OR, 27.5; P<.001) were more likely to be managed appropriately compared with patients with LDL >or=190 mg/dL and those at high risk. Among 375 patients eligible for drug treatment, those with LDL levels between 131 and 159 mg/dL were much less likely to be treated (OR, 0.15; P<.001) compared with those with LDL >190 mg/dL, whereas risk category did not influence treatment. The challenge facing implementation of ATP III guidelines is much greater for intermediate- and high-risk patients than for low-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":83876,"journal":{"name":"Preventive cardiology","volume":"12 2","pages":"95-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2937269/pdf/nihms-227886.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7141.2008.00019.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A study was undertaken to ascertain the appropriateness of lipid screening and management per the Third Report of the Adult Treatment Panel National Cholesterol Education Program (ATP III) guideline in a sample of North Carolina primary care practices. Demographics, cholesterol values, and comorbid conditions were abstracted from the medical records from 60 community practices participating in a randomized practice-based trial (Guideline Adherence for Heart Health). Eligible patients were aged 21 to 84 years, seen during the baseline period of June 1, 2001, through May 31, 2003, and who were not taking lipid-lowering therapy. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess whether age, sex, race/ethnicity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, ATP III risk category, or pretreatment low-density lipoprotein (LDL) influenced treatment. Among 5031 eligible patients, 1711 (34.5%) received screening lipid profiles. Screening rates were higher with older age, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. No large differences were seen by sex. Among patients screened (mean age, 51.6 years; 57.9% female), 76.6% were appropriately managed within 4 months. In adjusted analyses, older age was associated with less appropriate treatment (odds ratio [OR] per 5 years, 0.91; P=.01), and patients with LDL cholesterol or=190 mg/dL and those at high risk. Among 375 patients eligible for drug treatment, those with LDL levels between 131 and 159 mg/dL were much less likely to be treated (OR, 0.15; P<.001) compared with those with LDL >190 mg/dL, whereas risk category did not influence treatment. The challenge facing implementation of ATP III guidelines is much greater for intermediate- and high-risk patients than for low-risk patients.

按性别和心血管风险水平划分的初级保健中胆固醇管理的适宜性
根据成人治疗小组国家胆固醇教育计划(ATP III)指南第三次报告,在北卡罗来纳州初级保健实践样本中进行了一项研究,以确定脂质筛查和管理的适当性。统计数据、胆固醇值和合并症从60个社区实践的医疗记录中提取,这些社区实践参与了一项随机实践试验(心脏健康指南依从性)。符合条件的患者年龄在21岁到84岁之间,在2001年6月1日至2003年5月31日的基线期间,并且没有接受降脂治疗。使用多变量logistic回归来评估年龄、性别、种族/民族、糖尿病、心血管疾病、ATP III风险类别或预处理低密度脂蛋白(LDL)是否影响治疗。在5031例符合条件的患者中,1711例(34.5%)接受了血脂筛查。老年、糖尿病和心血管疾病患者的筛查率更高。性别差异不大。在接受筛查的患者中(平均年龄51.6岁;57.9%女性),76.6%在4个月内得到妥善处理。在校正分析中,年龄越大与治疗不当相关(每5年的优势比[OR]为0.91;P= 0.01),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇或=190 mg/dL的患者和高危患者。在375名符合药物治疗条件的患者中,LDL水平在131 - 159 mg/dL之间的患者接受治疗的可能性要小得多(OR, 0.15;P190 mg/dL,而危险类别不影响治疗。与低危患者相比,中危患者实施ATP III指南面临的挑战要大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书