Suitability of two commercial preparations for disinfections against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine.

Ayhan Yilmaz, Erhard Franz Kaleta
{"title":"Suitability of two commercial preparations for disinfections against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine.","authors":"Ayhan Yilmaz,&nbsp;Erhard Franz Kaleta","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two commercially available preparations from the disinfectants list of the German Veterinary Association (Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft e. V. (DVG)) were tested against a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) field isolate in a concentration as recommended in the list for disinfection of bacteria. The \"Guidelines of DVG for testing of disinfection methods and chemical disinfectants\" were used as methodical base. Initially, the examinations for determination of the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and suitable inactivation substances were carried out. The bactericidal effect of both commercial preparations--a formic acid preparation (55 g per 100 g) and a preparation containing 21 g glutaraldhyde plus 17 g per 100 g formaldehyde--as well as reference disinfectants (37% formaldehyde and 99.5% phenol) were examined in suspension and carrier tests. The suspension tests were performed without and with protein load (20% FBS). Pieces of linden wood were used as carriers. The recommendation of DVG for both Venno Vet 1 super and M&enno Veterinär B neu as bactericide (except of bacterial spores) is 30 min (for preventive disinfections) as well as 120 min contact (for specific disinfections) of 1% concentration. The results show that the disinfection of MRSA do not require higher concentrations and longer contact times as recommended in the disinfectant list of DVG for both commercial disinfectants. Both products were effective in suspension tests in a 1% concentration and within five minutes independent of protein load. In contrast, 1% phenol (reference disinfectant for suspension tests) needed 30 min reaction time without protein load as well as 60 min with protein load for complete inactivation of the MRSA field strain. In carrier tests, a 30 min contact of 1% concentration of both commercial disinfectants and 3% concentration of formalin (reference disinfectant for carrier tests) was sufficient for complete disinfection.</p>","PeriodicalId":49278,"journal":{"name":"Dtw. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dtw. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two commercially available preparations from the disinfectants list of the German Veterinary Association (Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft e. V. (DVG)) were tested against a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) field isolate in a concentration as recommended in the list for disinfection of bacteria. The "Guidelines of DVG for testing of disinfection methods and chemical disinfectants" were used as methodical base. Initially, the examinations for determination of the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and suitable inactivation substances were carried out. The bactericidal effect of both commercial preparations--a formic acid preparation (55 g per 100 g) and a preparation containing 21 g glutaraldhyde plus 17 g per 100 g formaldehyde--as well as reference disinfectants (37% formaldehyde and 99.5% phenol) were examined in suspension and carrier tests. The suspension tests were performed without and with protein load (20% FBS). Pieces of linden wood were used as carriers. The recommendation of DVG for both Venno Vet 1 super and M&enno Veterinär B neu as bactericide (except of bacterial spores) is 30 min (for preventive disinfections) as well as 120 min contact (for specific disinfections) of 1% concentration. The results show that the disinfection of MRSA do not require higher concentrations and longer contact times as recommended in the disinfectant list of DVG for both commercial disinfectants. Both products were effective in suspension tests in a 1% concentration and within five minutes independent of protein load. In contrast, 1% phenol (reference disinfectant for suspension tests) needed 30 min reaction time without protein load as well as 60 min with protein load for complete inactivation of the MRSA field strain. In carrier tests, a 30 min contact of 1% concentration of both commercial disinfectants and 3% concentration of formalin (reference disinfectant for carrier tests) was sufficient for complete disinfection.

两种市售制剂在兽药中抗甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌消毒剂的适用性。
用德国兽医协会(Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft e. V. (DVG))消毒剂清单中的两种市售制剂,按照细菌消毒清单中推荐的浓度,对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)现场分离物进行了测试。方法依据为《消毒方法和化学消毒剂检验指南》。首先,进行了最低抑制浓度(MIC)和合适的灭活物质的测定。在悬浮液和载体试验中考察了两种商业制剂——甲酸制剂(每100克55克)和含有21克戊二醛加每100克甲醛17克的制剂——以及参考消毒剂(37%甲醛和99.5%苯酚)的杀菌效果。悬浮试验分别进行无蛋白和含蛋白(20%胎牛血清)的悬浮试验。一些椴木被用作载体。对于Venno Vet 1 super和M&enno Veterinär B neu作为杀菌剂(除细菌孢子外),DVG的推荐使用时间为30分钟(用于预防性消毒)和120分钟(用于特异性消毒),浓度为1%。结果表明,两种市售消毒剂对MRSA的消毒不需要DVG消毒剂清单中推荐的更高浓度和更长的接触时间。两种产品在悬浮液试验中都是有效的,浓度为1%,在5分钟内与蛋白质负载无关。相比之下,1%苯酚(悬浮液试验的参考消毒剂)在没有蛋白负荷的情况下需要30分钟的反应时间,在有蛋白负荷的情况下需要60分钟的反应时间才能完全灭活MRSA野外菌株。在载体试验中,接触1%浓度的商业消毒剂和3%浓度的福尔马林(载体试验的参考消毒剂)30分钟就足以完全消毒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信