[Use of an evaluation score for rectal mucosal prolapse].

Chirurgia italiana Pub Date : 2009-01-01
Fabio Gaj, Antonello Trecca, Pietro Crispino
{"title":"[Use of an evaluation score for rectal mucosal prolapse].","authors":"Fabio Gaj,&nbsp;Antonello Trecca,&nbsp;Pietro Crispino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rectal mucosal prolapse is characterised by the protrusion of the mucosa alone in the rectal lumen. The authors, after an experience conducted in ambulatory patients, have produced a score to classify the extent of rectal mucosal prolapse based on evaluation of qualitative and quantitative factors that should help in the correct management of proctological patients. A total of 30 patients with proctological symptoms during outpatient visits were submitted to a minimally invasive test in comparison to the traditional ones, using a simple gauze plug connected to the end of a suture thread, inserted in the rectal lumen and removed via the anus. The score designed by the authors made it possible to classify 96.6% of patients accurately. In 4 patients the score was equal to zero. In 12 patients there was a mucosal prolapse of less than 25% with a reduction score equal to 2.4 and therefore these were treated with a single rubber ligature (7 patients with classes a and b) and 5 patients were treated with the transfixed stitch technique (TST) (class c). In 10 patients a 50% mucosal prolapse of the anal circumference and a mean reduction score of 5.6 were found. In 5 of these patients (classes a and b) it was possible to perform a multiple ligature while the other 5 (class c) were treated with TST. In 3 patients a prolapse ranging from 50 to 75% with a mean reduction index of 8.1 was found. The therapeutic procedure preferred for these patients was TST. In one patient a circumferential prolapse was diagnosed with a reduction score of 11 treated with Longo's surgical technique. The mucosal prolapse score seems to be useful to stratify patients more precisely in the choice of surgical intervention and during follow-up. The plug test is a minimally invasive test, useful for the application of the rectal mucosal prolapse score.</p>","PeriodicalId":75700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia italiana","volume":"61 1","pages":"77-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia italiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rectal mucosal prolapse is characterised by the protrusion of the mucosa alone in the rectal lumen. The authors, after an experience conducted in ambulatory patients, have produced a score to classify the extent of rectal mucosal prolapse based on evaluation of qualitative and quantitative factors that should help in the correct management of proctological patients. A total of 30 patients with proctological symptoms during outpatient visits were submitted to a minimally invasive test in comparison to the traditional ones, using a simple gauze plug connected to the end of a suture thread, inserted in the rectal lumen and removed via the anus. The score designed by the authors made it possible to classify 96.6% of patients accurately. In 4 patients the score was equal to zero. In 12 patients there was a mucosal prolapse of less than 25% with a reduction score equal to 2.4 and therefore these were treated with a single rubber ligature (7 patients with classes a and b) and 5 patients were treated with the transfixed stitch technique (TST) (class c). In 10 patients a 50% mucosal prolapse of the anal circumference and a mean reduction score of 5.6 were found. In 5 of these patients (classes a and b) it was possible to perform a multiple ligature while the other 5 (class c) were treated with TST. In 3 patients a prolapse ranging from 50 to 75% with a mean reduction index of 8.1 was found. The therapeutic procedure preferred for these patients was TST. In one patient a circumferential prolapse was diagnosed with a reduction score of 11 treated with Longo's surgical technique. The mucosal prolapse score seems to be useful to stratify patients more precisely in the choice of surgical intervention and during follow-up. The plug test is a minimally invasive test, useful for the application of the rectal mucosal prolapse score.

[直肠粘膜脱垂评估评分的使用]。
直肠粘膜脱垂的特征是直肠腔内粘膜的突出。作者根据门诊病人的经验,根据定性和定量因素的评估,产生了一个评分来分类直肠粘膜脱垂的程度,这应该有助于直肠病人的正确管理。与传统的微创检查相比,共有30例门诊期间出现直肠症状的患者接受了微创检查,使用简单的纱布塞连接缝线末端,插入直肠管腔并通过肛门取出。作者设计的评分可以准确地对96.6%的患者进行分类。4例患者得分为零。在12例患者中,粘膜脱垂小于25%,复位评分为2.4,因此采用单一橡胶结扎治疗(7例患者为a级和b级),5例患者采用穿刺缝合技术(TST)治疗(c级)。在10例患者中,发现肛门周围粘膜脱垂50%,平均复位评分为5.6。其中5例患者(a类和b类)可以进行多次结扎,而其他5例患者(c类)接受TST治疗。3例患者脱垂50% ~ 75%,平均复位指数8.1。这些患者首选的治疗方法是TST。其中一名患者被诊断为圆周脱垂,采用Longo手术技术治疗,复位评分为11分。粘膜脱垂评分似乎有助于在手术干预的选择和随访期间更准确地对患者进行分层。栓试验是一种微创试验,对直肠粘膜脱垂评分有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信