Strengthening field-based training in low and middle-income countries to build public health capacity: Lessons from Australia's Master of Applied Epidemiology program.

Mahomed S Patel, Christine B Phillips
{"title":"Strengthening field-based training in low and middle-income countries to build public health capacity: Lessons from Australia's Master of Applied Epidemiology program.","authors":"Mahomed S Patel,&nbsp;Christine B Phillips","doi":"10.1186/1743-8462-6-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Health Regulations (2005) and the emergence and global spread of infectious diseases have triggered a re-assessment of how rich countries should support capacity development for communicable disease control in low and medium income countries (LMIC). In LMIC, three types of public health training have been tried: the university-based model; streamed training for specialised workers; and field-based programs. The first has low rates of production and teaching may not always be based on the needs and priorities of the host country. The second model is efficient, but does not accord the workers sufficient status to enable them to impact on policy. The third has the most potential as a capacity development measure for LMIC, but in practice faces challenges which may limit its ability to promote capacity development.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We describe Australia's first Master of Applied Epidemiology (MAE) model (established in 1991), which uses field-based training to strengthen the control of communicable diseases. A central attribute of this model is the way it partners and complements health department initiatives to enhance workforce skills, health system performance and the evidence-base for policies, programs and practice.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The MAE experience throws light on ways Australia could collaborate in regional capacity development initiatives. Key needs are a shared vision for a regional approach to integrate training with initiatives that strengthen service and research, and the pooling of human, financial and technical resources. We focus on communicable diseases, but our findings and recommendations are generalisable to other areas of public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":87170,"journal":{"name":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","volume":"6 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-6-5","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-6-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: The International Health Regulations (2005) and the emergence and global spread of infectious diseases have triggered a re-assessment of how rich countries should support capacity development for communicable disease control in low and medium income countries (LMIC). In LMIC, three types of public health training have been tried: the university-based model; streamed training for specialised workers; and field-based programs. The first has low rates of production and teaching may not always be based on the needs and priorities of the host country. The second model is efficient, but does not accord the workers sufficient status to enable them to impact on policy. The third has the most potential as a capacity development measure for LMIC, but in practice faces challenges which may limit its ability to promote capacity development.

Discussion: We describe Australia's first Master of Applied Epidemiology (MAE) model (established in 1991), which uses field-based training to strengthen the control of communicable diseases. A central attribute of this model is the way it partners and complements health department initiatives to enhance workforce skills, health system performance and the evidence-base for policies, programs and practice.

Summary: The MAE experience throws light on ways Australia could collaborate in regional capacity development initiatives. Key needs are a shared vision for a regional approach to integrate training with initiatives that strengthen service and research, and the pooling of human, financial and technical resources. We focus on communicable diseases, but our findings and recommendations are generalisable to other areas of public health.

Abstract Image

加强低收入和中等收入国家的实地培训,以建立公共卫生能力:来自澳大利亚应用流行病学硕士课程的经验教训。
背景:《国际卫生条例》(2005年)以及传染病的出现和全球蔓延促使人们重新评估富裕国家应如何支持中低收入国家控制传染病的能力发展。在低收入和中等收入国家,已经尝试了三种类型的公共卫生培训:以大学为基础的模式;对专业工人进行流式培训;以及实地项目。第一种国家的生产率低,教学不一定总是以东道国的需要和优先事项为基础。第二种模式是有效的,但没有赋予工人足够的地位,使他们能够影响政策。第三种方法最有潜力成为低收入和中等收入国家的能力发展措施,但在实践中面临的挑战可能会限制其促进能力发展的能力。讨论:我们描述了澳大利亚的第一个应用流行病学硕士(MAE)模式(建立于1991年),该模式利用实地培训来加强传染病的控制。这一模式的一个核心特征是,它与卫生部门的举措合作并加以补充,以提高劳动力技能、卫生系统绩效以及政策、规划和实践的证据基础。摘要:MAE的经验为澳大利亚在区域能力发展倡议中开展合作的方式提供了启示。关键的需要是对区域办法的共同愿景,将培训与加强服务和研究的举措结合起来,并汇集人力、财政和技术资源。我们的重点是传染病,但我们的发现和建议也可推广到公共卫生的其他领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信