Problems associated with the recognition and confirmation of low-dose endocrine toxicities.

John Ashby
{"title":"Problems associated with the recognition and confirmation of low-dose endocrine toxicities.","authors":"John Ashby","doi":"10.1080/15401420390271038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our attempts to confirm reports of low-dose/hormetic effects in rodent endocrine toxicity studies are reviewed. It is concluded that our present failure to confirm any such effects is due, in large part, to a general lack of understanding of confounding influences and the failure of most investigators to confirm their findings before publication. The major potential confounding factor is suggested to be variability of the parameters under study within control groups, a factor that assumes increased importance when attempting to demonstrate weak low-dose effects. This is illustrated by our studies with bisphenol A in the mouse uterotrophic assay and of finasteride in the Hershberger antiandrogenicity assay. In both of these cases our ability to demonstrate a low-dose effect is dependent on whether concurrent or recent control values are used.</p>","PeriodicalId":74315,"journal":{"name":"Nonlinearity in biology, toxicology, medicine","volume":"1 4","pages":"439-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2656120/pdf/nbtm-1-4-0439.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonlinearity in biology, toxicology, medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15401420390271038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our attempts to confirm reports of low-dose/hormetic effects in rodent endocrine toxicity studies are reviewed. It is concluded that our present failure to confirm any such effects is due, in large part, to a general lack of understanding of confounding influences and the failure of most investigators to confirm their findings before publication. The major potential confounding factor is suggested to be variability of the parameters under study within control groups, a factor that assumes increased importance when attempting to demonstrate weak low-dose effects. This is illustrated by our studies with bisphenol A in the mouse uterotrophic assay and of finasteride in the Hershberger antiandrogenicity assay. In both of these cases our ability to demonstrate a low-dose effect is dependent on whether concurrent or recent control values are used.

与识别和确认低剂量内分泌毒性相关的问题。
本文回顾了我们在啮齿动物内分泌毒性研究中为证实低剂量/遗传效应报告所做的努力。结论是,我们目前未能证实任何此类效应,在很大程度上是由于普遍缺乏对混杂影响因素的了解,以及大多数研究者未能在发表研究结果之前对其进行证实。据认为,主要的潜在混杂因素是对照组内研究参数的变异性,当试图证明微弱的低剂量效应时,这一因素就变得更加重要。我们在小鼠子宫营养试验中对双酚 A 的研究和在赫什伯格抗雄激素试验中对非那雄胺的研究就说明了这一点。在这两种情况下,我们证明低剂量效应的能力取决于使用的是同期对照值还是近期对照值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信