[Comparison of three chemiluminescent methods with a radioimmunoassay for thyroglobulin measurement in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer].

Dakar medical Pub Date : 2007-01-01
Niang M Sylla, C Bombled, M Schlumberger, J M Bidart
{"title":"[Comparison of three chemiluminescent methods with a radioimmunoassay for thyroglobulin measurement in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer].","authors":"Niang M Sylla,&nbsp;C Bombled,&nbsp;M Schlumberger,&nbsp;J M Bidart","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Serum thyroglobulin measurements play an integral role in clinical evaluation of patients with thyroid cancer. Serum thyroglobulin is a highly specific and sensitive tumor marker for detecting persistent or recurrent thyroid cancer but also for monitoring clinical status. Actually, chemiluminescent methods gain ground on the radioimmunological methods because they offer the practical advantage of a shorter incubation time, a wider range of measured values and a reagent marked antibody more stable, less fragile than those used on radioimmunoassay. The aim of this study was to compare, by correlation study, three chemiluminescent methods to the reference radioimmunological method usually used in laboratories.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thyroglobulin was measured in 203 patients by the 3 following analyzers: Nichols Advantage (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, CA, USA), Immulite 2000 ( DPC Roche, Siemens, Los Angeles, USA) and Elecsys 2010 (Roche Diagnostics, Manheim, Germany); and by manual method (SELco Tg (Medipan Diagnostica, Berlin, Germany). Correlation analysis with OriginLab software version 7.0 was performed in order to compare thyroglobulin distribution values measured by the different methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlation coefficients obtained were for Medipan/ Immulite 2000: 0.95 (n = 80); for Medipan/Elecsys: 0.97 (n = 31); for Medipan/Advantage: r = 0.96 (n = 73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chemioluminescent technics we studied could be validly used in patients without anti-thyroglobulin antibody. The correlation coefficients we obtained allow us to select one of these automated methods after their performance was studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":75773,"journal":{"name":"Dakar medical","volume":"52 3","pages":"225-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dakar medical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Serum thyroglobulin measurements play an integral role in clinical evaluation of patients with thyroid cancer. Serum thyroglobulin is a highly specific and sensitive tumor marker for detecting persistent or recurrent thyroid cancer but also for monitoring clinical status. Actually, chemiluminescent methods gain ground on the radioimmunological methods because they offer the practical advantage of a shorter incubation time, a wider range of measured values and a reagent marked antibody more stable, less fragile than those used on radioimmunoassay. The aim of this study was to compare, by correlation study, three chemiluminescent methods to the reference radioimmunological method usually used in laboratories.

Materials and methods: Thyroglobulin was measured in 203 patients by the 3 following analyzers: Nichols Advantage (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, CA, USA), Immulite 2000 ( DPC Roche, Siemens, Los Angeles, USA) and Elecsys 2010 (Roche Diagnostics, Manheim, Germany); and by manual method (SELco Tg (Medipan Diagnostica, Berlin, Germany). Correlation analysis with OriginLab software version 7.0 was performed in order to compare thyroglobulin distribution values measured by the different methods.

Results: Correlation coefficients obtained were for Medipan/ Immulite 2000: 0.95 (n = 80); for Medipan/Elecsys: 0.97 (n = 31); for Medipan/Advantage: r = 0.96 (n = 73).

Conclusions: Chemioluminescent technics we studied could be validly used in patients without anti-thyroglobulin antibody. The correlation coefficients we obtained allow us to select one of these automated methods after their performance was studied.

【化学发光法与放射免疫法在分化型甲状腺癌随访中甲状腺球蛋白测定的比较】。
血清甲状腺球蛋白测量在甲状腺癌患者的临床评估中起着不可或缺的作用。血清甲状腺球蛋白是一种高度特异性和敏感性的肿瘤标志物,可用于检测持续性或复发性甲状腺癌,也可用于监测临床状况。实际上,化学发光法比放射免疫法更有优势,因为它们具有孵育时间短、测量值范围宽、标记抗体的试剂比放射免疫法更稳定、更不脆弱等实际优势。本研究的目的是通过相关性研究,将三种化学发光方法与实验室常用的参考放射免疫方法进行比较。材料和方法:203例患者的甲状腺球蛋白检测采用以下3种分析仪:Nichols Advantage(美国加利福尼亚州尼科尔斯研究所诊断公司)、Immulite 2000 (DPC罗氏,西门子,洛杉矶,美国)和Elecsys 2010(罗氏诊断公司,曼海姆,德国);手工方法(SELco Tg (Medipan diagnostics, Berlin, Germany))。采用OriginLab 7.0软件进行相关性分析,比较不同方法测得的甲状腺球蛋白分布值。结果:Medipan/ Immulite 2000的相关系数为0.95 (n = 80);Medipan/Elecsys: 0.97 (n = 31);Medipan/Advantage: r = 0.96 (n = 73)。结论:化学发光技术可有效地用于无抗甲状腺球蛋白抗体的患者。我们得到的相关系数允许我们在研究了这些自动化方法的性能后选择其中的一种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信